Should we limit members in one campaign?

[natmuller68]

This is bounty managers decision but for me, yes i agree to give limit on particular campaign, but we are bounty hunters we're here because for some practical reasons to earn, we must share the blessings to others because we have same purpose for being here in this crypto world. On selfish thought limited is the best option but we have to consider others also looking the opportunity to join and earn.

They can join also if it's a newbie, you just need to join at the right time not to late and if the Jr members et seignor members are full you can do more post to become a hero members and generaly you have a lot of time to join bounty.

[capt ronald]

Some campaigns are limiting their participants but only few campaigns are doing this but most campaign did not limit the participants because they need more participants to advertise and wear their signature to be known.

[BestSSS]

I think we have to invent a restriction for the participants of the bounty of companies with the same IP address. Often, one bounty participant creates 10 accounts and participates in one company for 10 people. This is wrong and it is necessary as it is limited, it may be better to come up with the passage of KYC as an ICO and then there will be less scams

[boysnoel12]

It should be limited as it is considered as cheating.

[Iconic]

OK. I think that depends on the requirements and regulations made by the ICO Project, bro. I think if there are restrictions on participants, the bounty campaign might be caused by the ICO's internal regulations, bro. Although there are several projects that do not limit the number of Bounty Participants but still later the acquisition of the Token will be divided equally. It's likely in my opinion like that.

[altery0518]

I think this is really a good thing that the admin will review most especially for campaigns that there are lot's of participant because there are time that the bounty hunters receive only a little rewards due to so many participants.

[bountyecrire]

Yes I think there should be a number that will limit the participants. Otherwise the bounty will divide too much.

[Stuart]

You clearly stated that ... although that means the project is very interesting. Everyone who works is because they know its a good project and they'll receive their rewards. The project has made an allocation of token out of the total supply, and they need people to spread their news around. Reducing number of participants in bounty is a decision to be taken by the project management. Taking a certain number of participants has only been on Signature campaigns where one is paid directly in bitcoins, have not seen any on bounties.

[Kyoshiro]

I disagree with you bro. Because the purpose of the campaign is to make their project be known to the willing investors and users in order for them to make a profit. If they limit the participants of their bounty then they will have a lesser chance of advertising their campaign. That's what I thought.

[fallenangel1789]

You need to calculate how much your stakes are worth, at least after a week. You are right. Sometimes I see thousands of participants at Twitter and Facebook bounty campaigns. I have never participated such bounties. I think they are just a waste of time. But to limit number of participants will not be fair too.

[pationex]

If I think it is true that members of the Bounty campaign in a project must be limited according to the capacity and ability of the project parties to provide rewards to campaign members. If there are too many members of the Bounty campaign, there will be fewer rewards given by the bounty manager to the campaign members, because the tokens they give are divided equally from all members of the existing Bounty campaign.

[Legenda]

Nice topic although few months ago.
Nowaday, honestly bounty activity give me small reward.
Cause the major factor is a lot of participant that joined that bounty.
We can't blame developer team and bounty manager cause if many partisipant it will make spread the project nicely.
But try to limit member of bounty campaign I think good work for bounty hunter and make better prosperity.

But in my heart deeply, I want agree if limit members. Cause why? I think bounty hunter like another profession. And it spend time, mind, etc. The developer or bounty should be honor that.

[Unknown]

I think limiting participants is good for the bounty hunters, but not good for the spreading of the token, thats why projects didnt limit participants

[juv3ntus1]

Depends of  the buget of bounty if  its low i think its a good ideea to limit the participations nowbody want to work at least a month and get low reward ,if the buget is high no ,everybody will get a good reward.

[Adjong]

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

for me it is necessary to limit the participation of companies to lesser wages per member to join a company.