Airdrop updates

[armanda90]

Yes, that is just one example, because there are many ways for organizers to make rules that are fair for all participants. And that is also what we always hear from them, which is that they try to do it well.

This is entirely the organizer's right and we as participants can only follow and avoid things that can cause elimination.

Some time any airdrop make additional rule after the airdrop project ended and some participant not eligible for airdrop reward, did you see with PAWS airdrop participants not eligible for airdrop? Most of them have spent many star, make transaction for spending many TON coins after having thousand hundred points but not eligible yet.
The airdrop PAWS have additional rule for checking human activity but limited few days only for participants pass this feature, I think many airdrop project have bad side when additional rule after their participants have much effort spending time, work, money until push referral level.

[Cryptsafe]

Yes, that is just one example, because there are many ways for organizers to make rules that are fair for all participants. And that is also what we always hear from them, which is that they try to do it well.

This is entirely the organizer's right and we as participants can only follow and avoid things that can cause elimination.

Some time any airdrop make additional rule after the airdrop project ended and some participant not eligible for airdrop reward, did you see with PAWS airdrop participants not eligible for airdrop? Most of them have spent many star, make transaction for spending many TON coins after having thousand hundred points but not eligible yet.
The airdrop PAWS have additional rule for checking human activity but limited few days only for participants pass this feature, I think many airdrop project have bad side when additional rule after their participants have much effort spending time, work, money until push referral level.

The majority of them did buy wPaws and badges to support the project and yet nothing as they were disqualified from being eligible for the token distribution I heard that it would be the 27th and now the 27th has passed no update on distribution. This whole stuff looks somehow though. I am just watching to see how things unveil itself. We hope they better behave and do well because the community is not happy with the team's actions os disqualifying millions of participants and it is not encourageable.

[$crypto$]

Yes, that is just one example, because there are many ways for organizers to make rules that are fair for all participants. And that is also what we always hear from them, which is that they try to do it well.

This is entirely the organizer's right and we as participants can only follow and avoid things that can cause elimination.

Some time any airdrop make additional rule after the airdrop project ended and some participant not eligible for airdrop reward, did you see with PAWS airdrop participants not eligible for airdrop? Most of them have spent many star, make transaction for spending many TON coins after having thousand hundred points but not eligible yet.
The airdrop PAWS have additional rule for checking human activity but limited few days only for participants pass this feature, I think many airdrop project have bad side when additional rule after their participants have much effort spending time, work, money until push referral level.

The majority of them did buy wPaws and badges to support the project and yet nothing as they were disqualified from being eligible for the token distribution I heard that it would be the 27th and now the 27th has passed no update on distribution. This whole stuff looks somehow though. I am just watching to see how things unveil itself. We hope they better behave and do well because the community is not happy with the team's actions os disqualifying millions of participants and it is not encourageable.

Many are disappointed with the rules implemented by one of the airdrop apps, because as you said they disqualified more than half of the participants.

Even people who spend money to participate in the airdrop are not considered participants who deserve prizes. But sometimes that's what airdrops are like, our minds sometimes make rules as they please in the middle of the road.

[yohananaomi]

Well, besides that, we also have to be careful with transactions between wallets, because they also usually apply rules where if there is a transaction between wallets, the participant will be disqualified because it is considered cheating.

This is a very basic thing for airdrop hunters that they should actually know. Because we cannot deny that some participants do have multiple accounts.

It seems that what you said is true, that almost every airdrop participant will always have several accounts to participate in and this cannot be avoided because they continue to try to outsmart so that what they get is very satisfying.
Of course, there is always protection carried out by the airdrop organizer, one of which is, as you said, by implementing inter-wallet transactions which may be easier for participants but are actually violations and disqualifications can occur.

Yes, that is just one example, because there are many ways for organizers to make rules that are fair for all participants. And that is also what we always hear from them, which is that they try to do it well.

This is entirely the organizer's right and we as participants can only follow and avoid things that can cause elimination.

I agree that there are always many ways that organizers can do so that what they use as a reference can be implemented by participants without exception. If they violate the rules that have been made, then they can unilaterally carry out elimination.
It should be like that, as organizers, they must be able to act fairly so that no one is benefited in an unwise way.

[$crypto$]

Yes, that is just one example, because there are many ways for organizers to make rules that are fair for all participants. And that is also what we always hear from them, which is that they try to do it well.

This is entirely the organizer's right and we as participants can only follow and avoid things that can cause elimination.

I agree that there are always many ways that organizers can do so that what they use as a reference can be implemented by participants without exception. If they violate the rules that have been made, then they can unilaterally carry out elimination.
It should be like that, as organizers, they must be able to act fairly so that no one is benefited in an unwise way.

And sometimes we feel like we haven't done anything wrong so when we say we're eliminated, we get confused about what really happened.

However, they know better what mistakes we made, because it's not that we didn't make mistakes, but we don't know we made mistakes, because usually some rules are not stated publicly and only they know, yes even though it sounds a little unfair.

[yohananaomi]

Yes, that is just one example, because there are many ways for organizers to make rules that are fair for all participants. And that is also what we always hear from them, which is that they try to do it well.

This is entirely the organizer's right and we as participants can only follow and avoid things that can cause elimination.

I agree that there are always many ways that organizers can do so that what they use as a reference can be implemented by participants without exception. If they violate the rules that have been made, then they can unilaterally carry out elimination.
It should be like that, as organizers, they must be able to act fairly so that no one is benefited in an unwise way.

And sometimes we feel like we haven't done anything wrong so when we say we're eliminated, we get confused about what really happened.

However, they know better what mistakes we made, because it's not that we didn't make mistakes, but we don't know we made mistakes, because usually some rules are not stated publicly and only they know, yes even though it sounds a little unfair.

What you said is something that actually happens and sometimes what they do, we don't know about the mistakes that might have been made, but it was unilaterally annulled and not appropriate and not calculated.
agree that usually, some rules are made by themselves and according to their criteria and there is no clear information for further action, and it doesn't sound unfair, but it is indeed unfair.

[Cryptsafe]

Yes, that is just one example, because there are many ways for organizers to make rules that are fair for all participants. And that is also what we always hear from them, which is that they try to do it well.

This is entirely the organizer's right and we as participants can only follow and avoid things that can cause elimination.

Some time any airdrop make additional rule after the airdrop project ended and some participant not eligible for airdrop reward, did you see with PAWS airdrop participants not eligible for airdrop? Most of them have spent many star, make transaction for spending many TON coins after having thousand hundred points but not eligible yet.
The airdrop PAWS have additional rule for checking human activity but limited few days only for participants pass this feature, I think many airdrop project have bad side when additional rule after their participants have much effort spending time, work, money until push referral level.

The majority of them did buy wPaws and badges to support the project and yet nothing as they were disqualified from being eligible for the token distribution I heard that it would be the 27th and now the 27th has passed no update on distribution. This whole stuff looks somehow though. I am just watching to see how things unveil itself. We hope they better behave and do well because the community is not happy with the team's actions os disqualifying millions of participants and it is not encourageable.

Many are disappointed with the rules implemented by one of the airdrop apps, because as you said they disqualified more than half of the participants.

Even people who spend money to participate in the airdrop are not considered participants who deserve prizes. But sometimes that's what airdrops are like, our minds sometimes make rules as they please in the middle of the road.

Airdrops sometimes do not guarantee rewards,  just like some people would say that airdrops are a kind of gamble people do to get rewards that are not certain. It is very risky and as such not advisable to [put in funds with the current state of airdrops and scams that are in existence. The worst of it is that the telegram platform does not really verify these projects before they launch and this is the reason why the scams are on the rise and nothing anybody can do about it but rather to be very careful with their engagements while with them.

[Vx1]

~

What you said is something that actually happens and sometimes what they do, we don't know about the mistakes that might have been made, but it was unilaterally annulled and not appropriate and not calculated.
agree that usually, some rules are made by themselves and according to their criteria and there is no clear information for further action, and it doesn't sound unfair, but it is indeed unfair.

It could be that we are not careful enough, so that there are requirements that are missed or we do not do. So that we do not meet the requirements and are finally canceled, in working on Airdrop we really have to be careful about every rule that exists.

[Cryptsafe]

Seed TGE will launch on March 20th as the community awaits the distribution and listing, although the team has not released any exchange information yet. Although it has not yet been verified on their X handle but was captured on the discord handle. 



If you participated in the bubble map airdrop, they are airdropping to the first 1000 on their list and if you made the list, you can check to see your allocation here;  claim.bubblemaps.io. I am not sure how reliable this link is but approach it with caution.

[libert19]

Just a heads up If anyone did tasks in Initia testnet and used Initia wallet to login, make sure to migrate your wallet by March 18th 3:00 AM UTC here: https://migration.initia.xyz/

If you used mm/keplr/leap wallet to login, you do not need to migrate.

Ann: https://x.com/initia/status/1897849131605074336

Migration website won't allow you to proceed on mobile device, workaround about it on android is to go to developer options >> smallest width >> set it to 1048.


P.S: This is crosspost post from Bitcointalk.

[Mr. Magkaisa]

Seed TGE will launch on March 20th as the community awaits the distribution and listing, although the team has not released any exchange information yet. Although it has not yet been verified on their X handle but was captured on the discord handle. 



If you participated in the bubble map airdrop, they are airdropping to the first 1000 on their list and if you made the list, you can check to see your allocation here;  claim.bubblemaps.io. I am not sure how reliable this link is but approach it with caution.

        -      I haven't been updated on the airdrops that are happening in the crypto space for about 2 months now. I also decided not to participate in airdrops because they are just a waste of time for me according to my experience.

The only problem is that I'm not sure if they are really reliable, so extra caution is still needed in case anyone tries to participate, because we know that those who exploit are also doing things to victimize themselves.

[Cryptsafe]

Seed TGE will launch on March 20th as the community awaits the distribution and listing, although the team has not released any exchange information yet. Although it has not yet been verified on their X handle but was captured on the discord handle. 



If you participated in the bubble map airdrop, they are airdropping to the first 1000 on their list and if you made the list, you can check to see your allocation here;  claim.bubblemaps.io. I am not sure how reliable this link is but approach it with caution.

        -      I haven't been updated on the airdrops that are happening in the crypto space for about 2 months now. I also decided not to participate in airdrops because they are just a waste of time for me according to my experience.

The only problem is that I'm not sure if they are really reliable, so extra caution is still needed in case anyone tries to participate, because we know that those who exploit are also doing things to victimize themselves.

Sure one needs to take caution while participating in these airdrops otherwise, you will get stuck up and lose what you shouldn't have. While some are genuine some are also scams and some are just time wasters but what is left for one to do is to do their proper research before engaging in such airdrop.

[rdluffy]

Just a quick reminder that at times like these, when the market is very pessimistic, fearful, and there's not much to be gained from trading or coins appreciation, it's probably the best time to dedicate to new projects and farm some airdrops

Many people are giving up, not farming anymore, and there will be less competition
Don't stop chasing airdrops, because when the market goes up again people will go again and will be late

[Cryptsafe]

Just a quick reminder that at times like these, when the market is very pessimistic, fearful, and there's not much to be gained from trading or coins appreciation, it's probably the best time to dedicate to new projects and farm some airdrops

Many people are giving up, not farming anymore, and there will be less competition
Don't stop chasing airdrops, because when the market goes up again people will go again and will be late

I was actually thinking about what you have said and here is the confirmation of my thoughts to be in the right direction. As it is the market is fluctuating and the market direction is not really clear, people would give up on trading and airdroppers too would lose interest. This is the right time because the allocation would be high for farming airdrops etc. I had to concentrate on farming, nodes, and extensions connected beta testing so I could accumulate more points as I virtually have my gadgets on 24 hours connected to the internet and fully active and functional.

[rdluffy]

I was actually thinking about what you have said and here is the confirmation of my thoughts to be in the right direction. As it is the market is fluctuating and the market direction is not really clear, people would give up on trading and airdroppers too would lose interest. This is the right time because the allocation would be high for farming airdrops etc. I had to concentrate on farming, nodes, and extensions connected beta testing so I could accumulate more points as I virtually have my gadgets on 24 hours connected to the internet and fully active and functional.

Nice to know that, good luck Cryptsafe!

At a time like this it's easy to get discouraged, but I remember very well that when there were good airdrops by Zksync, Layer0, Starknet, Hyperliquid and others, it was when the market was soaring, euphoric, and the vast majority of users arrived late and the biggest question of all was: is there still time to participate in the airdrop?
User who farmed when the market was boring and low got great rewards

So the timing is good, the discouraged will come back late and complain once again that they won't get a good return