Now I can see from the two side that the language is changing and now it is for the general public in the two forums to also deliberate on it. Even bitcoin is open source and it is open for all the people in the world, it is not everyone can invest in it because of one thing or the other. Therefore that concept of all should be limited because there are some people that can't invest and not that they don't want to invest but they don't have the opportunity to invest. And I am arguing this from the social science perspective. And precisely economic, political and sociology angle.
Lol 😂, brother, maybe you should calm down a bit, what you are arguing about is completely different from the perspective that is built into bitcoin, and think of it this way, your economic, political and it sociological perspective to the statement that "Bitcoin is for all" does not change the fact that Bitcoin is actually for all, and why is this?
It's simple, there is no form of restrictions built into the bitcoin code; which limits who can buy/invest in it, and who can't, everyone, and I mean every single person in the world can buy/invest and hold bitcoin if they want, and if anybody can't for some reasons or the other, it's completely not the fault of bitcoin, it is not because is not accessible to them, it is simply their own personal issues or decisions/opinions that is holding them from buying/investing, of which if any day, they wake up and that issue is solved, or they somehow managed to change their decision/opinion; (most especially) as it concerned bitcoin, such one or they can buy/invest in bitcoin without restrictions or limitations.
So to sum it up, we ourselves, are our own restriction/limitation/unaccessibility to bitcoin, bitcoin is for all, but it's still on us to decide whether to buy/invest in it or not.