[ANN] bitcoindata.science

[examplens]

Bump.

Bitcoindata.science already have tools that are not connected with bitcointalk forum in any way.

I just stated how it all started

Something's cooking here, isn't it? 

[NotATether]

Bitcoindata.science already have tools that are not connected with bitcointalk forum in any way.
You can check balance of multiple addresses, or you can use Unit Converter to convert Bitcoin price to many local fiat currencies.
I need to think more what could be done as a privacy project for bitcoin, maybe something related with Silent Payments.

Isn't that the entire collection of utilities though? If I remember correctly, only the Bitcoin Image API is dependent on Bitcointalk. The rest, such as Bitcoin DCA Strategy, Unit Converter, Balance Checker are platform-agnostic. Even Giveaway Manager can be used on Altcoinstalks if somebody really wants to. (By the way, how many projects have used the Giveaway Manager?)

[bitmover]

Something's cooking here, isn't it? 

lol where does it comes from

Isn't that the entire collection of utilities though? If I remember correctly, only the Bitcoin Image API is dependent on Bitcointalk. The rest, such as Bitcoin DCA Strategy, Unit Converter, Balance Checker are platform-agnostic.

Even the API can be used here!

Bitcoin price now!

Even Giveaway Manager can be used on Altcoinstalks if somebody really wants to. (By the way, how many projects have used the Giveaway Manager?)

I have no idea how many projects have used giveaway manager. Dozens!! There are different projects using it every week! I am very happy with the adoption!!

Bitcoindata.science already have tools that are not connected with bitcointalk forum in any way.
You can check balance of multiple addresses, or you can use Unit Converter to convert Bitcoin price to many local fiat currencies.
I need to think more what could be done as a privacy project for bitcoin, maybe something related with Silent Payments.

I liked to idea to add Silent Payments. I read a few about it, and i would like to add it to balance checker.

However, I don't think it is possible to derive public addresses from the silent payment address (if that would be possible, there would be no privacy as far as I understand)

I am open for new ideas as projects.

[examplens]

Even Giveaway Manager can be used on Altcoinstalks if somebody really wants to. (By the way, how many projects have used the Giveaway Manager?)

I have no idea how many projects have used giveaway manager. Dozens!! There are different projects using it every week! I am very happy with the adoption!!

Many stick to old habits and determine a specific block that will define the raffle winner. It seems simpler for the one who starts the raffle. However, this tool makes it easier because it is not necessary to wait for all slots to be filled (there will be no need to select the block again)

bitmover I think that maybe you didn't present the functionality and the way of using your giveaway manager. I got the impression that some will not use it because they see the old way as simpler. Just my opinion

[bitmover]

Many stick to old habits and determine a specific block that will define the raffle winner. It seems simpler for the one who starts the raffle. However, this tool makes it easier because it is not necessary to wait for all slots to be filled (there will be no need to select the block again)

bitmover I think that maybe you didn't present the functionality and the way of using your giveaway manager. I got the impression that some will not use it because they see the old way as simpler. Just my opinion

Marketing is everything.

Somehow this tool didn't make a ot of success in this forum, but it works well in btt.

This tool also use a block hash as the result  , but with a few calculations

[dkbit98]

I liked to idea to add Silent Payments. I read a few about it, and i would like to add it to balance checker.

However, I don't think it is possible to derive public addresses from the silent payment address (if that would be possible, there would be no privacy as far as I understand)

Yes, only the owner of silent payment address can now other connected bitcoin addresses.
I didn't mean that you should derive addresses, but think of some interesting way how you could use silent payments on Bitcoindata.science website.
Easy thing you can do is to add Silent Payment address for accepting donations.

[bitmover]

Easy thing you can do is to add Silent Payment address for accepting donations.

This is a good idea. I just need to download a wallet. I will add it in a few days!

I like the idea of silent payments .

I also added liquid, but none donation so far.

[examplens]

Something's cooking here, isn't it? 

lol where does it comes from

I guess you didn't watch the Breaking Bad series 

[dkbit98]

I also added liquid, but none donation so far.

You mean to say that you didn't receive any donations so far on Bitcoindata.science website, or that only applies for Liquid Network assets?
I would like to see breakdown what coins and networks are mostly used for donations, but I think that Bitcoin mainnet is not the best choice for donating smaller amounts when transaction fees are higher.

[bitmover]

You mean to say that you didn't receive any donations so far on Bitcoindata.science website, or that only applies for Liquid Network assets?
I would like to see breakdown what coins and networks are mostly used for donations, but I think that Bitcoin mainnet is not the best choice for donating smaller amounts when transaction fees are higher.

I didn't receive  any in liquid network

I received some donations already. Paid2 recently gave me a large one.. also Timelord2067  donated  5year domain Renewal, JayJuanGee Paid for the developed of the withdrawal-strategy,  and also l0tt0.com and bc.game sponsored the website for some months.

 I also receive 1-5 usd donations in btc sometimes from random people.

[NotATether]

You mean to say that you didn't receive any donations so far on Bitcoindata.science website, or that only applies for Liquid Network assets?
I would like to see breakdown what coins and networks are mostly used for donations, but I think that Bitcoin mainnet is not the best choice for donating smaller amounts when transaction fees are higher.

I didn't receive  any in liquid network

That makes sense, because nobody is really doing anything with Liquid. It's all either the bitcoin main chain or the Lightning Network. It doesn't help that Liquid is not really supported by any software, except for anything from blockstream (blockstream.info and Jade, the hardware wallet) immediately come into mind.

[dkbit98]

That makes sense, because nobody is really doing anything with Liquid. It's all either the bitcoin main chain or the Lightning Network.

I am not doing anything on Lightning Network, and I don't think Bitmover received any donations with that also.
I think than Lightning won't even exist in few years, it has done nothing to help adoption of bitcoin and it didn't solve any problems.
I looked at some stats and most of the wallets and infrastructure people are using in LN is 100% centralized, like WalletOfSatoshi and similar custodial wallets.

[bitmover]

That makes sense, because nobody is really doing anything with Liquid. It's all either the bitcoin main chain or the Lightning Network.

I am not doing anything on Lightning Network, and I don't think Bitmover received any donations with that also.
I think than Lightning won't even exist in few years, it has done nothing to help adoption of bitcoin and it didn't solve any problems.
I looked at some stats and most of the wallets and infrastructure people are using in LN is 100% centralized, like WalletOfSatoshi and similar custodial wallets.

I don`t accept donations in my domain on Lightning Network because I was never able to set a LN address which is valid forever. All wallets that I ever use only give me addresses/invoices with expirations...

If someone wants to donate on LN, they would have to contact me directly (it happened a few times)

[dkbit98]

I don`t accept donations in my domain on Lightning Network because I was never able to set a LN address which is valid forever. All wallets that I ever use only give me addresses/invoices with expirations...

Let's face it, it's pain in the ass to use Lightning Network for average users, and I don't think this will ever be accepted worldwide.
I heard reports from people that were at Bitcoin conference in Nashville how almost nobody was using Lightning wallets there, except probably people who promote this.
And stats are clearly showing that most users are using custodial LN wallets.

[bitmover]

And stats are clearly showing that most users are using custodial LN wallets.

I agree 100%

Aqua is somewhat custodial LN wallet.. I didn't create the channel.

I have used LN a lot in binance as well.

I don't think LN is a good solution at all.