examplens
My BTC addy: bc1qfhkvpalg8ngmv03e4kk429lq9f8tp79czefs6s
Here is my reviewAs I believe that the review campaign serves to improve the service and possibly identify shortcomings, I only deal with things that I think should be improved.
DesignI will stick to my position that I stated earlier, that the widget used for the mixing process itself should be larger
https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=322767.msg1589082#msg1589082Responsive design is a basic thing today.
Info hints are missing, I think they are necessary because they should provide the information to the user so that no error occurs. So for example, instead of just a red box, the information that an incorrect Bitcoin address was entered would make it easier to identify the problem.
Also, an info hint about the input field and which addresses are acceptable would be appreciated

I would make the function of clicking on the icon for the onion page to "copy the link address" in memory, rather than opening the page in a new tab (as it is currently). If I visited the clearnet site using Chrome, I certainly could not open the onion page. Copy, it would be more useful for me to transfer the link to TOR.

Also, I would rather see the entire official onion link printed here, rather than just the icon. This can help prevent phishing sites.
I also think that your official main Bitcoin address should be clearly visible.
PGP PUBLIC KEY could perhaps be in a more compatible extension, txt for example. some of my devices got confused with the .asc extension
In the contact section, You can add a link to the ANN thread on the Altcoinstalks forum. However, it is also one of the channels for communication with the service
On the order page, some important information is missing that is important to know, and not all users will read the help corner first. For example, information that the session is valid for 6 days and that after that the user loses the deposit.
The importance of saving the order ID, for example by closing TOR later it is not possible to find the previous page in the cache. Calling the cache at all is a bad choice.
Help centerI did not find complete information about the total fee.
You should remove this or at least avoid accidental clicks. I assume you don't want complaints that someone accidentally clicked on red button, closed the session and ran out of xx Bitcoins

Click on destroy will immediately delete the session. There is not even a warning here "Are you sure you want to destroy the session" This can cause the loss of coins...
I didn't find any info on when the session was safe/guaranteed. When is the deposit transaction recognized or only after 1 or more confirmations?
If the user sent a deposit, but for example because of a lower fee, the transaction was not confirmed, what happens in that case? After 6 days everything is deleted?? (a very realistic scenario)
You also have a mess with the http and https pages via TOR. https does not work, and it would be preferable to use https instead of http
Mixing process:No support for Taproot addresses!
What is happening here?
The service fee is 2%, but it is quite obvious that much more than 2% has been calculated in the calculator. On deposit of 0.001, will receive 0.00038. Plus It is clearly indicated that the network fee is not included. It is unclear whether this means the fee that the service will pay for sending coins or what.

btw. the same amount of 0.001 with a 4% service fee will receive 0.00036. So obviously there is a fixed fee per transaction, which is not stated anywhere.
It seems like some extra 0.0006btc cost, that is not written anywhere
The download link of the Letter of guarantee should be at the top of the order page, it would even be desirable if there was a mandatory check box where the user would confirm that he has downloaded the file before sending any coins.
The letter of guarantee should be more complete and have more information.
For example, LoG generation time, User deposit address, and selected fee rate. Also, some more recognizable messages, for example, "This letter is digitally signed by Jokermix.to main address: 1xxx"
I would also add the order ID here, so those who forgot to copy it, and accidentally closed the page, still have this kind of information.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Payment Address:
bc1qe5ah4fjrsy5p9rgu73e9ka3s7r0jnsuhn9l7rs
ONLY 1 TRANSACTION ALLOWED!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
ZmFzZjMyNGprSiMkSmtmajo6OTkxZWI2M2ViNjMwODQzOWI3NmRlMWEzMzU5M2E3OWFjZmM4OTAzYTg1ZDFjYzVjOGMyOWIyZDU1MWIyMGMzYg==
I am curious about the fact that it is possible to wait longer for the realization of mixing due to the lack of users at a certain moment. What does it mean? That you don't have enough personal resources for a smooth process? If coins are exchanged exclusively between users, that would mean that someone can get coins with a high AML score risk?
Maybe it wouldn't be bad if you could give more details about how it is mixed on Jokermix.
I originally planned to send a deposit and test the process fully, but with the additional "hidden" fee, it's not worth it. At least not for this review, because the fee costs more than the review reward. Plus, at this moment, I can't wait up to a few days to finalize the mixing process.
However, in some future period, I will probably test that part as well.