And they outlined a bounty hunters that can help them recover the funds, it's 10% of the total money that has been hacked,
--snip--
The offer is interesting, although it's hard to imagine the hacker being careless which lead to returning funds. On top of that, the hacker always swap hacked asset for something else, which makes it more complicated.
I think this is not about finding a hacker but offering the real hackers a 10% of the sum and immunity in a criminal's case, basically, they pay back the sum they get fully legal 10% of it and everyone is happy and no police are involved.
I've never heard before, although I could be wrong about a hacker hacking the wallets of a criminal especially since they don't know where the coins are actually, imagine the hacker miraculously finds those are hosted in a cold wallet somewhere and they hack some dex for it, how would that even work from a legal point of view?
But as for WazirX, I'm not so sure how anyone can feel sorry for them. Because they failed to implement a SAFU fund for their users as an insurance against getting hacked, and now the result is their customers bearing the burnt of the loss.
I think the SAFU worked only during the time when they were either bought or under Binance

after all , isn't SAFU a trademark , lol?