Why does the crypto community seem so pliable and immediately start glorifying public figures, only if he mentions Bitcoin or cryptocurrencies?
One of the most respected examples, Elon Musk, gave public support to Dogecoin, and the final impression was that he only manipulated, made additional income and possibly promoted his brands.
We have had a slight euphoria about Trump for some time now. I don't want to go into how much weight his words have, but it is remarkable how much the crypto community interprets everything he says, and various discussions about what he will do regarding crypto in the future. Meme coins with his image and name are being created, I even saw signatures in support of Trump on the Bitcointalk forum. I will not even talk about spam on social networks.
Isn't that quite an exaggeration?
Why is the crypto community so susceptible to manipulation?
You ask a very good question that has fascinated me personally for a very long time. In countless discussions over the years on BTT, and recently also here, I realized that many people are simply looking for a leader who will tell them what to do - and if that person is also extremely rich (powerful), then he becomes their role model.
The fact is that Bitcoin has no
"leader" after Satoshi retreated into the shadows, and apart from the fact that many often complain that 21 million BTC is too few coins, most are obsessed with his identity and with the possibility that he will appear one day.
When Mr. Mars or Mr. Donald Do Not Trust say something about Bitcoin or cryptocurrencies in general from their positions, it has the effect of throwing a bone to a dog (without offending anyone). When we think about it, rich people are rich because they mostly cheat the system and exploit everyone around them, and politicians mostly pave their way to the top with false promises, so I also wonder why anyone would get so excited about what they are talking about?