For users who are in a hurry to participate in signature campaigns

[Freemind]

With the growth of the forum and the appearance of new signature campaigns, there are users who seem desperate to be able to participate in them. It is something that I partially understand, since being able to earn something extra is always an incentive, what does not make sense is the way of doing things in some cases.

Several weeks ago we saw a user who wrote more than 60 posts in one day (approximately) to increase his rank, a few days ago another user "wrote" 46 posts with the help of AI with the same intention. Not only does that violate several forum rules, but it's not fair.

From here I propose the creation of a new specific badge for this type of users so that signature campaign managers can quickly identify them.

I would like to know what the users and also the administrator think.

Thank you all.

[MrSpasybo]

From here I propose the creation of a new specific badge for this type of users so that signature campaign managers can quickly identify them.

I think we have badges "too active, 25 Posts in one day" and "Super active 50 Posts in one day". Mods can easily refer to these and remind these hasty members.

Posting 25-50 posts a day might come from enthusiasm, especially for new members when they find a crypto forum to discuss their passion. However, sometimes it's a hint for mods to check for plagiarism or AI-generated issues in these members' posts.

[Freemind]

@MrSpasybo the badges you refer to are not to highlight the negative part of writing that number of posts, like spam, for example. I have a few of those badges and it wasn't spam., but because I was very active, especially in the Spanish forum, since it is my native language and it is much easier to write a greater number of posts.

What I wanted to express in the first post is something much clearer so that managers can quickly identify this type of users, the "negative" part.

The design of the badges would logically be the responsibility of the administrator, who is the one who creates them, the important thing is that the message is clear.

Thanks for your opinion

[Lucius]

~snip~
From here I propose the creation of a new specific badge for this type of users so that signature campaign managers can quickly identify them.
I would like to know what the users and also the administrator think.
Thank you all.

I support this idea, and not only a special badge for those who are caught using AI or plagiarizing their posts, but also for those who are on the forum just to shill something, or for those who are obvious spammers.

Although every honest manager will in most cases manage to avoid such members himself, it can make their job easier - and at the same time it will help other users of the forum to pay attention to such members and report them if they continue to do such things.

[TomPluz]

From here I propose the creation of a new specific badge for this type of users so that signature campaign managers can quickly identify them.

As a moderator, I am 100% supporting this idea so that we can help make the forum really free from spams and low-quality posts including the use of AI. Hopefully, the badge can help signature managers identify bad members of the forum and can also help discourage those who are planning to make some mess in here.

[pakhitheboss]

There isn't much traffic as you have comprehended @Freemind and that the forum should come up with new badges is what I disagree. As suggested by @MrSpasybo I think those badges are sufficient to make a BM understand whom to hire and whom not to. It would be too much cautious with new badges as the forum has enough of them as per my understanding. I do feel there are many boards that should be either removed or renamed with the current hype and trend. All due respect the admin should come up with a board dedicated to TON blockchain.

I have already created a thread in relation to it.
https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=322951.0

[kai]

Several weeks ago we saw a user who wrote more than 60 posts in one day (approximately) to increase his rank,,,

But what if those 60 posts have good quality posts, are useful and provide a lot of information to all members in the forum?
For example, there are Miner experts who can reply to posts at any time with such a fast response when they (with all cryptocurrency Miners) are discussing mining in the altcoinstalks forum.

[Findingnemo]

The design of the badges would logically be the responsibility of the administrator, who is the one who creates them, the important thing is that the message is clear.

Thanks for your opinion

If I am not wrong the user already recieved a custom badge which says 100 posts in one day spammer which is exactly what you're suggesting right now.

User's profile link : https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?action=profile;u=81570

And also I just saw strike for his cheating that's sums up and I don't think any campaign will let him to be a part of it.

[electronicash]

let me just play the contrarian just to keep the discussion    they will not participate in the right manner once they are labelled.

the forum isn't really as huge as the other, maybe there is a need to loosen up a bit. give them warnings, maybe the 3rd time is going to make the account ban. but for the 1st and 2nd, there is the incentive to do posts a ton a day and using AI could be possibly make them rank fast. the incentive is there which is why someone will likely be taking that route.

[Freemind]

There isn't much traffic as you have comprehended @Freemind and that the forum should come up with new badges is what I disagree. As suggested by @MrSpasybo I think those badges are sufficient to make a BM understand whom to hire and whom not to. It would be too much cautious with new badges as the forum has enough of them as per my understanding. I do feel there are many boards that should be either removed or renamed with the current hype and trend. All due respect the admin should come up with a board dedicated to TON blockchain.

I have already created a thread in relation to it.
https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=322951.0

It is true that the forum still does not have the traffic that we would all like, but it is also true that it is growing, so I think it would be ideal to have things "fixed" before it continues to grow so that later we don't have to do things in a hurry. I'd like to know what you think about that.

I have the 25 posts in a day badge and my posts have not been spam. Also, if you look at my profile on the left, you will see that the badge is not showing up, so a manager must visit each user's profile to find out what badges they have and if they are positive or negative in terms of behavior.

Clarity in the message of the badges would save a lot of time and allow some users with undesirable behaviors to "mistakenly" participate in campaigns.

But what if those 60 posts have good quality posts, are useful and provide a lot of information to all members in the forum?
For example, there are Miner experts who can reply to posts at any time with such a fast response when they (with all cryptocurrency Miners) are discussing mining in the altcoinstalks forum.

The problem with what you're saying is that it would be an extremely rare case for a user to write 60 useful posts in one day, and if that were the case, that user would have a good track record to compare to, but that's not the case. Furthermore, it is very clear that the user has used AI to create the posts.

[kai]

....
Furthermore, it is very clear that the user has used AI to create the posts.

Oh My God, this is too much and this can indeed be called Spammers. 

May I ask, is there a tool to check if they are using AI to post?
And how to identify them using AI (like robots) in making posts?

[God Of Thunder]

I support the idea as well, and I would like to propose some other solutions as well. Yes, you can make some new badges for these people so it's easy for the campaign managers. One campaign manager already wrote in his campaign that he does not accept applications from users who have red dots and regret badges in their profiles. So, you may add similar to this one.

My suggestion is to restrict newbies a little more. You should not allow more than ten daily posts to newbies, Jr., and Member rank users. I don't think a senior member or a hero and above will spam like this. Even if members of higher ranks write 50 posts daily, they will maintain the quality. So, just like we have reporting limits, you can set limits for newbies so they cannot rush and do not generate spam.

[bitmover]

From here I propose the creation of a new specific badge for this type of users so that signature campaign managers can quickly identify them.

I think badged should be used for good contributions and achievements, not punishment.

IMO, the user should receive some red tag or some red text below his user name (like "monitored") or something like that...

[KingsDen]

Is there actually a rule of how many number of posts are expected of a user in a day? It's not that I support someone making 60 posts a day, because I even find it difficult to complete 30 posts a week. But I have this question;

• If a user makes 60 posts a day;
• Gives atleast 15mins difference between the posts;
• Not using AI;
• And the posts are on point;

Should that be considered as a spam?

[yhiaali3]

I support the idea of ​​creating a new badge for this type of users so that the campaign managers can quickly identify them and this will make the campaign managers' job easier.

But I also suggest that it should be more specific to those who have these bad posting habits only, meaning that a member may write a large number of posts in one day by accident for some reason and this is not his habit and in this case it is not fair for him to get the same badge that indicates a bad habit.