Telegram CEO is arrested, do you continue investing in tokens in Ton ecosystem?

[yohananaomi]

Don't worry they are all good. Telegram will continue to function, nothing will stop it at all and The TON blockchain isn't going anywhere anytime soon, There is a protocol for these types of scenarios.

Telegram is a centralized service, their servers are controlled by the company, if someone wants to shut them down they can simply seize that and their domains and the whole thing goes down in seconds. There is no "protocol" there is no way around it, everything in there is centralized, from the architecture to the databases
Telegram even complied years ago and has mandatory databases hosted in the Netherlands to comply with EU laws.

I think what you said is something that is true in my opinion, all control is done by the company and at any time it could stop if the server was turned off, but because this is a fairly large company, it is certain that if there is a problem they will be able to make repairs properly according to the rules of the game that may be needed. As a large company they have a tiered staff with qualified expertise and are able to solve every problem that may come to them and there is no need to doubt telegram

[KryptoBull]

I think what you said is something that is true in my opinion, all control is done by the company and at any time it could stop if the server was turned off, but because this is a fairly large company, it is certain that if there is a problem they will be able to make repairs properly according to the rules of the game that may be needed. As a large company they have a tiered staff with qualified expertise and are able to solve every problem that may come to them and there is no need to doubt telegram

Telegram will continue to exist and thrive in markets where it is licensed and not subject to bans or suppression. We don't need to worry about Telegram's future, we should be concerned about our privacy when using Telegram!

Ton seems to have been unaffected by this negative news, which is a good sign of the maturity and independence of this ecosystem. Only blockchains that provide value to users have a chance to survive and gain long-term user support by participating in dApp experiences and providing media support.

[luckyledger]

I think what you said is something that is true in my opinion, all control is done by the company and at any time it could stop if the server was turned off, but because this is a fairly large company, it is certain that if there is a problem they will be able to make repairs properly according to the rules of the game that may be needed. As a large company they have a tiered staff with qualified expertise and are able to solve every problem that may come to them and there is no need to doubt telegram

Telegram will continue to exist and thrive in markets where it is licensed and not subject to bans or suppression. We don't need to worry about Telegram's future, we should be concerned about our privacy when using Telegram!

Ton seems to have been unaffected by this negative news, which is a good sign of the maturity and independence of this ecosystem. Only blockchains that provide value to users have a chance to survive and gain long-term user support by participating in dApp experiences and providing media support.

It was affected though when they just came out a bit, however, now, it's all fine, as I saw 

[doc]

I think what you said is something that is true in my opinion, all control is done by the company and at any time it could stop if the server was turned off, but because this is a fairly large company, it is certain that if there is a problem they will be able to make repairs properly according to the rules of the game that may be needed. As a large company they have a tiered staff with qualified expertise and are able to solve every problem that may come to them and there is no need to doubt telegram

Telegram will continue to exist and thrive in markets where it is licensed and not subject to bans or suppression. We don't need to worry about Telegram's future, we should be concerned about our privacy when using Telegram!

Ton seems to have been unaffected by this negative news, which is a good sign of the maturity and independence of this ecosystem. Only blockchains that provide value to users have a chance to survive and gain long-term user support by participating in dApp experiences and providing media support.

TON was only briefly affected by Durov's arrest, then the price of TON went up again. And this is good, it means that TON users don't seem to care much about the news of Durov's arrest.
I also focus more on our privacy in using wallets and telegrams because this is more important, because there are many scammers who are certainly looking for prey in airdrops using the TON network, because currently the TON network is hype.

[pieppiep]

Don't worry they are all good. Telegram will continue to function, nothing will stop it at all and The TON blockchain isn't going anywhere anytime soon, There is a protocol for these types of scenarios.

Telegram is a centralized service, their servers are controlled by the company, if someone wants to shut them down they can simply seize that and their domains and the whole thing goes down in seconds. There is no "protocol" there is no way around it, everything in there is centralized, from the architecture to the databases
Telegram even complied years ago and has mandatory databases hosted in the Netherlands to comply with EU laws.

I think what you said is something that is true in my opinion, all control is done by the company and at any time it could stop if the server was turned off, but because this is a fairly large company, it is certain that if there is a problem they will be able to make repairs properly according to the rules of the game that may be needed. As a large company they have a tiered staff with qualified expertise and are able to solve every problem that may come to them and there is no need to doubt telegram

Yes, recently Telegram has proven that it is ready to abide by actual legislation, which has been demonstrated by concrete actions, such as storing data in areas that meet the legislation of the European Union. This goes to show just how solemn the company is about preserving trust and the safety of it’s users. In this case, we can be very confident that Telegram has good mechanisms in place to tackle all sorts of issues that may come up. One might say that they are not only very persistent organizations but also have quite a multiple hierarchy, which enables them to react to any given circumstances with great professionalism.

Of course, the knowledge of the Telegram team is perhaps one of the key factors that allow them to keep the service stable and secure for their customers. In the context of technology that often develop, the stability of a big company like this is very essential, and in addressing issues that may crop up at any given period in time. In this manner, we as users can always be cozy and sure that Telegram will always be available to stand the rays or shocks which may come.

[Rubel007]

I think what you said is something that is true in my opinion, all control is done by the company and at any time it could stop if the server was turned off, but because this is a fairly large company, it is certain that if there is a problem they will be able to make repairs properly according to the rules of the game that may be needed. As a large company they have a tiered staff with qualified expertise and are able to solve every problem that may come to them and there is no need to doubt telegram

Telegram will continue to exist and thrive in markets where it is licensed and not subject to bans or suppression. We don't need to worry about Telegram's future, we should be concerned about our privacy when using Telegram!

Ton seems to have been unaffected by this negative news, which is a good sign of the maturity and independence of this ecosystem. Only blockchains that provide value to users have a chance to survive and gain long-term user support by participating in dApp experiences and providing media support.

TON was only briefly affected by Durov's arrest, then the price of TON went up again. And this is good, it means that TON users don't seem to care much about the news of Durov's arrest.
I also focus more on our privacy in using wallets and telegrams because this is more important, because there are many scammers who are certainly looking for prey in airdrops using the TON network, because currently the TON network is hype.

Durov's arrest did not have any impact on the market as it could have. I think one of the reasons is the increase in user awareness. We've seen in the past when Binance was charged that investor interest dropped dramatically but after a period of time Binance bounced back to its former position. In the same way Durov's arrest, it quickly recovers even if it is slightly affected. Currently Ton network is in hype those who are experienced will definitely use this opportunity to focus on increasing the holing of the coin. In the coming bull market, the project is becoming more popular than before. I think there is no panic among ordinary investors about Durov's arrest.

[enoch_from_off]

Durov's arrest did not have any impact on the market as it could have. I think one of the reasons is the increase in user awareness. We've seen in the past when Binance was charged that investor interest dropped dramatically but after a period of time Binance bounced back to its former position. In the same way Durov's arrest, it quickly recovers even if it is slightly affected. Currently Ton network is in hype those who are experienced will definitely use this opportunity to focus on increasing the holing of the coin. In the coming bull market, the project is becoming more popular than before. I think there is no panic among ordinary investors about Durov's arrest.

Yeah, because Durov isn't the Telegram itself, and to extent TON too.
That would be as to say that if Satoshi were found and imprisoned, BTC would die down and drop in price for a long time. Not at all.
 

[KryptoBull]

TON was only briefly affected by Durov's arrest, then the price of TON went up again. And this is good, it means that TON users don't seem to care much about the news of Durov's arrest.
I also focus more on our privacy in using wallets and telegrams because this is more important, because there are many scammers who are certainly looking for prey in airdrops using the TON network, because currently the TON network is hype.

I remain cautious about the Wallet on Telegram as it's merely provided by a third-party company, not a product of Ton or Telegram itself. Scams are bound to increase during an uptrend, and Ton will undoubtedly be one of their targets due to its large user base and growing attention.

Ton is developing independently with its own tokenomics. Its separation from Telegram is essential, similar to how the BNB chain is considered distinct from Binance. This independence safeguards the network from vulnerabilities associated with centralized points of failure.

[luckyledger]

TON was only briefly affected by Durov's arrest, then the price of TON went up again. And this is good, it means that TON users don't seem to care much about the news of Durov's arrest.
I also focus more on our privacy in using wallets and telegrams because this is more important, because there are many scammers who are certainly looking for prey in airdrops using the TON network, because currently the TON network is hype.

I remain cautious about the Wallet on Telegram as it's merely provided by a third-party company, not a product of Ton or Telegram itself. Scams are bound to increase during an uptrend, and Ton will undoubtedly be one of their targets due to its large user base and growing attention.

Ton is developing independently with its own tokenomics. Its separation from Telegram is essential, similar to how the BNB chain is considered distinct from Binance. This independence safeguards the network from vulnerabilities associated with centralized points of failure.

Yeah, TON is associated with Telegram, but they are not entirely one entity.
In fact, some projects on TON utilize the future features which would be then implemented into Telegram itself (Major and TG Starts, for example).

[Hisbullah]

I remain cautious about the Wallet on Telegram as it's merely provided by a third-party company, not a product of Ton or Telegram itself. Scams are bound to increase during an uptrend, and Ton will undoubtedly be one of their targets due to its large user base and growing attention.

Ton is developing independently with its own tokenomics. Its separation from Telegram is essential, similar to how the BNB chain is considered distinct from Binance. This independence safeguards the network from vulnerabilities associated with centralized points of failure.

Of course we have to be careful with the telegram wallet, because this is a new wallet that I have and I don't know the reputation and security of the telegram wallet. I don't store large amounts of crypto assets on the telegram wallet, only airdrop coins, and I won't add other coins.

[KryptoBull]

Of course we have to be careful with the telegram wallet, because this is a new wallet that I have and I don't know the reputation and security of the telegram wallet. I don't store large amounts of crypto assets on the telegram wallet, only airdrop coins, and I won't add other coins.

It's a wise decision to decentralize crypto asset storage across multiple wallets, and to only trust wallets that we personally download and self-custody the private keys. Minimizing interactions with other platforms is also crucial. This is something we should have known even before Durov's legal issues.

I sense that Telegram users have become more cautious. I hope they'll continue to actively participate and support new projects on Ton, which are being widely promoted on Telegram to reach more users.

[malah]

I remain cautious about the Wallet on Telegram as it's merely provided by a third-party company, not a product of Ton or Telegram itself. Scams are bound to increase during an uptrend, and Ton will undoubtedly be one of their targets due to its large user base and growing attention.

Ton is developing independently with its own tokenomics. Its separation from Telegram is essential, similar to how the BNB chain is considered distinct from Binance. This independence safeguards the network from vulnerabilities associated with centralized points of failure.

Of course we have to be careful with the telegram wallet, because this is a new wallet that I have and I don't know the reputation and security of the telegram wallet. I don't store large amounts of crypto assets on the telegram wallet, only airdrop coins, and I won't add other coins.

But we still do the right things by being cautious in our use of this Telegram wallet, mainly because of that lack of formal security and established reputation of the wallet. Because we often do not add other coins, but only retain assets from airdrops, the risk is kept minimal and the potential for major losses is excluded. By operating with these kinds of assets, we consider ourselves safer, and we can observe the evolution of the platform step by step.

[yohananaomi]

I think what you said is something that is true in my opinion, all control is done by the company and at any time it could stop if the server was turned off, but because this is a fairly large company, it is certain that if there is a problem they will be able to make repairs properly according to the rules of the game that may be needed. As a large company they have a tiered staff with qualified expertise and are able to solve every problem that may come to them and there is no need to doubt telegram

Telegram will continue to exist and thrive in markets where it is licensed and not subject to bans or suppression. We don't need to worry about Telegram's future, we should be concerned about our privacy when using Telegram!

Ton seems to have been unaffected by this negative news, which is a good sign of the maturity and independence of this ecosystem. Only blockchains that provide value to users have a chance to survive and gain long-term user support by participating in dApp experiences and providing media support.

TON was only briefly affected by Durov's arrest, then the price of TON went up again. And this is good, it means that TON users don't seem to care much about the news of Durov's arrest.
I also focus more on our privacy in using wallets and telegrams because this is more important, because there are many scammers who are certainly looking for prey in airdrops using the TON network, because currently the TON network is hype.

It will indeed be difficult to make an impact on TON with Durov's arrest, because it is known that a telegram has a lot of staff who are able to run it without him. So if there is an impact, it is only momentary and can eventually recover.
I agree with you that the telegram wallet is very vulnerable because its privacy is very unknown to us due to the use of third parties, but I am sure that with the TON network being used more and more, it will improve it very at least there can be protection.

[satpol_PP]

It will indeed be difficult to make an impact on TON with Durov's arrest, because it is known that a telegram has a lot of staff who are able to run it without him. So if there is an impact, it is only momentary and can eventually recover.
I agree with you that the telegram wallet is very vulnerable because its privacy is very unknown to us due to the use of third parties, but I am sure that with the TON network being used more and more, it will improve it very at least there can be protection.

In my analysis, don't we often hear about hacked telegram accounts? If we use a telegram wallet, are we sure about the security of our telegram account? That's what we should consider.
Durov's arrest doesn't really affect TON, because we know there are staff who can handle it all, even though Durov is arrested.
I predict TON will be more popular in the future, so invest in this coin.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

Telegram projects are not encouraging to do any longer because they are disappointing, this is not because the CEO was arrested, but because maybe some of its ton networks projects developers are not willing to fund some of the projects they launch causes everything about them to continue dumping immediately after their launch, which makes it more discouraging.