Do you think we took the wrong path of focusing mostly on the investment value of Bitcoin neglecting its use as functional money?
My answer to this is No, and here are my reasons. You see, the inflation rate in most countries, especially the one I live in, is very high, which has drastically increased the cost of living, while the purchasing power of fiat currency (money) can't do much. Jobs are becoming scarce, and people in this situation will do anything to become financially stable. We've all seen what Bitcoin can do in terms of gaining value (i.e increasing in price) over time, making it an attractive investment option for many of us. Bitcoin serving as a means of investment is literally very simple to key into, because it doesn't require me signing any paperwork, and it can be done with a gradual amount. So I think the financial benefits of Bitcoin to everyone, is worth making it an investment option which doesn't sound as a wrong path. Although Satoshi called it a p2p electronic cash system, but it turns out to come with other great benefits to those who adopt it.
As others have said, government approval is a key factor that determines how Bitcoin is used in a country. Take El Salvador as an example, Bitcoin has become part of them since it was declared a legal tender, i.e Bitcoin has become like a normal currency to them, which is unlike other countries that it is not legal tender. So, I think this condition is actually what's creating the entire question. But, despite the whole government thing, we all still find a way to use it for different activities on the internet.