The main reason to avoid open karma logs is to avoid more retaliatory abuse of karma. As for the original proposal I don't really see the benefit.
Now, with the increased membership, I think it's challenging for admins and mods to detect all karma system abusers.
As I said, it's really not. The logs are pretty straightforward to analyse, smiting much less difficult also as not that much of it, but I don't expect you to take my word for it either.
Making the karma log public would deter abusers, as they'd know everyone can see their activity.
Again as a mod not interested in deterring abusers, because those who want to abuse the system generally want to abuse the forum rules as well, and they more often than not will find a way to do so without easily being detected. Allowing them to abuse the system means they can be caught much easier and quicker, as they are more likely to think that they can get away with it without karma logs being public.
If members can see who sends and receives karma, it would Encourage quality posts.if I receive karma for a post, I'll create more engaging content on that topic.Public logs would help identify and address negative karma abuse.
This comes back to an alternative proposal of identifying posts that have received positive or negative karma, without identifying the issuer, which I am all in favour of, and was something admin was previously working on. We don't need to know who issued the karma to know that a post was considered useful or otherwise a post was considered spam.
I'm not criticizing the admin or moderators; they're doing their best.
You're otherwise welcome to criticise admin or mods
