~snip
My thesis so far is that the grammar usage may be the cause of this discussion. "Crypto currencies" in comparison to "all crypto currencies " is obviously a vague statement in the sense that it may be refering to all crypto or just a group of crypto currencies. I checked out the link you posted here and I believe it's giving a similar definition as what I've said here. Here is the definition from the link you shared;
An asset is a resource with economic value that an individual, a company, or a country owns or controls with the expectation that it will provide a future benefit.
I already quoted the definition in my last reply, and I even underlined the phrase "future benefits", as it contradicts with the phrase "slightest moment" you mentioned earlier. I get it, grammatical expression seems to be the little problem here, or maybe it's a generalization problem. But it's nothing to debate about.
Now in context of this discussion we are referring more to an individual. The definition here suggests that an asset should have future benefit, and if you agree with me a meme coin does have benefits to their developers and people who profit off it. The only problem is you can't hodl them for long term.
If you say meme coins and tokens aren't digital assets then the are digital ______?
Let's assume you are right and I'm wrong. But I still don't see how meme coins are assets when their future benefits are highly speculative. If there is no certainty that I will benefit from a meme coin project, then why should I bother counting it as an asset.
Like I said in my last reply
There is no point mentioning meme coin because it's clearly a cryptocurrency, or is it not?.
Let's just use the word cryptocurrency/currencies, and stick to all what have been said. But Incase you wonder what I call them, maybe it's a digital speculative investment.
+1