Making $10,000 and above from Airdrop, Still possible?

[doc]

I also will not put money to participate in airdrops because we want rewards from the airdrops we participate in and there is no guarantee that after putting money into a transaction even though it is small we will get big rewards.
Many friends do it and the results in my opinion are also not big so I focus more on bounty campaigns and daily trading, for me this is more certain

An airdrop is a reward for community for either task or been loyal to them, any team that is asking community for money is either trying to get back what they are giving out to the community or they want to scam the community. Community time alone in helping the project is enough for the project to consider an honest free airdrop for the participants.

This year, I'm very selective with airdrop, I have also learn to ignore anything that is coming from telegram mini tapping, they are the only airdrop that gives such condition for there worthless tokens.

Currently telegram minigame is very hype using TON network. so I see many airdrop participants at the moment, but if the result is less valuable for me it's just a waste of time.
I agree with you who are selective in choosing which airdrop to follow because it really helps you get good and valuable projects.

[|MINER|]

It will depend on the project itself, because now it is also undeniable that some airdrops take advantage of their participants to make them gain profits, for example they ask to subscribe to their YouTube channel and so on.

However, I usually see projects that are not too hype that actually give big prizes, they are serious about working on the project and it also forms a solid community.

You are also right that. I just want to mean that most of the project just want to came for the gaining some Adsense money from there airdrop participants and as well have some the others investors who were in hype. And get profited.
But at the end of the day the both person the investors and the airdrop participants both were facing the losses. The investors were losing their money and on the others side the airdrop participants losing by wasting that time on behind of that airdrop.

[BitMaxz]

It will depend on the project itself, because now it is also undeniable that some airdrops take advantage of their participants to make them gain profits, for example they ask to subscribe to their YouTube channel and so on.

However, I usually see projects that are not too hype that actually give big prizes, they are serious about working on the project and it also forms a solid community.

You are also right that. I just want to mean that most of the project just want to came for the gaining some Adsense money from there airdrop participants and as well have some the others investors who were in hype. And get profited.
But at the end of the day the both person the investors and the airdrop participants both were facing the losses. The investors were losing their money and on the others side the airdrop participants losing by wasting that time on behind of that airdrop.

Is not it obvious that if they promote their project, as with the Telegram project and games, there will be a large number of participants who will receive it, implying that more supply will circulate on the market once the project is listed on premarket than those projects that are not as popular but are gaining more price pump. Investors are typically the ones pushing it to pump due to its uniqueness and low popularity and the activeness of the developers.
They don't even want more people to see their project because they know what will happen once they have lots of participants just like these hype telegram games.

[armanda90]

Airdrops allocation is another thing to look into because the bigger the allocation likely means the better the rewards for participants but however if the project is a good and quality one, the token value would be of good importance after listing. So these are some key factors people look into before they participate in projects but most projects do not reveal their allocation, they do that after while about listing that is near end of airdrop campaign and on some cases, it does not go down well with the participants. Projects that does such sometimes have ulterior motives and their actions ends up crumbling their projects out their own greed.

Its important thing for any airdrop project when listing at higher price but most important to know how much reward allocated each airdrop. If any airdrop allocated above 20% for participants make us excited for joining regarding later have lower price or higher price when listing at the market.
What for if any airdrop have much expensive price like Cati telegram airdrop with firstly price listing above $1 but have small reward allocated for participants, almost free participants earn small reward around $2 to $10 after pushing higher level rank of account.

[ajiz138]

It will depend on the project itself, because now it is also undeniable that some airdrops take advantage of their participants to make them gain profits, for example they ask to subscribe to their YouTube channel and so on.

However, I usually see projects that are not too hype that actually give big prizes, they are serious about working on the project and it also forms a solid community.

I have the same way with you by analyzing any airdrop project for joining, I don't care about how more popular or most fomo about one project but how much percent reward allocated for participants or their community. For airdrop with reward allocated above 20% to 70% is my priority project for joining not matter lack popularity but the developer brave for allocating more reward for participants.
I leave with project have small reward allocated under 10% exactly the project have been popular and joining million user, just waste time only because reward receiving later very small behind their allocated firstly.

Yes, we can use it to analyze, because from that alone we can assess how much the project appreciates the participants who help them. Usually, projects that will be successful later are projects that are generous to the community.

Because if we go back to the past, a project that was initially quite good, but they were not generous to the community, then the project would collapse by itself.

[Sakil123]

Yes possible.. Airdrops were initially used by new blockchain projects to distribute tokens for free to early adopters. In recent years, major blockchain projects like Uniswap, Optimism, and Arbitrum rewarded users with significant payouts—sometimes exceeding $10,000—based on their participation in early testing or governance.

[rizqillah]

Yes, we can use it to analyze, because from that alone we can assess how much the project appreciates the participants who help them. Usually, projects that will be successful later are projects that are generous to the community.

Because if we go back to the past, a project that was initially quite good, but they were not generous to the community, then the project would collapse by itself.

In addition to charitable projects, they must also be useful for users. because if the project they have is ordinary, the possibility of success of the project will be small.
However, many project teams do not keep their promises at the beginning, they will provide rewards with a large allocation, but it turns out that what is received is not in accordance with what they promised.

[enwi]

It will depend on the project itself, because now it is also undeniable that some airdrops take advantage of their participants to make them gain profits, for example they ask to subscribe to their YouTube channel and so on.

However, I usually see projects that are not too hype that actually give big prizes, they are serious about working on the project and it also forms a solid community.

I have the same way with you by analyzing any airdrop project for joining, I don't care about how more popular or most fomo about one project but how much percent reward allocated for participants or their community. For airdrop with reward allocated above 20% to 70% is my priority project for joining not matter lack popularity but the developer brave for allocating more reward for participants.
I leave with project have small reward allocated under 10% exactly the project have been popular and joining million user, just waste time only because reward receiving later very small behind their allocated firstly.

Yes, we can use it to analyze, because from that alone we can assess how much the project appreciates the participants who help them. Usually, projects that will be successful later are projects that are generous to the community.

Because if we go back to the past, a project that was initially quite good, but they were not generous to the community, then the project would collapse by itself.

That is why to judge the success of a given project by the amount of appreciation or the level of generosity that has been extended to the community in question might not be accurate. Yes, community support is a nice to have but it doesn’t make a project sustainable on its own, there are quite a number of factors that define sustainability such as innovation, management and implementation.

This takes us to the critical consideration on how the project creates tangible value and request solutions which are salient and meaningful to the market. It is easy to think of many projects that were very liberal initially but either never made the name or could not sustain for lack of proper planning or execution strategies. On the flip side, there are projects that would not have placed much on generosity but built up massive popularity as they provided large gains. Deciding on needs from a more balanced perspective provides a better perspective for making the decisions.

[ajiz138]

Yes, we can use it to analyze, because from that alone we can assess how much the project appreciates the participants who help them. Usually, projects that will be successful later are projects that are generous to the community.

Because if we go back to the past, a project that was initially quite good, but they were not generous to the community, then the project would collapse by itself.

In addition to charitable projects, they must also be useful for users. because if the project they have is ordinary, the possibility of success of the project will be small.
However, many project teams do not keep their promises at the beginning, they will provide rewards with a large allocation, but it turns out that what is received is not in accordance with what they promised.

Well, it would be better if they don't brag with sweet promises, even though promises may be part of their marketing in attracting many people to believe in them.

However, without making promises, they can actually still be big with their seriousness and also not underestimate the community that helps promote the project being built. This is important for the future of a project.

[armanda90]

In addition to charitable projects, they must also be useful for users. because if the project they have is ordinary, the possibility of success of the project will be small.
However, many project teams do not keep their promises at the beginning, they will provide rewards with a large allocation, but it turns out that what is received is not in accordance with what they promised.

Many project never keep their promised when the project almost ended, cut off reward payment allocation almost find at every airdrop project and looks easily for them change reward allocated.
Other change by airdrop project usually about listing or TGE announcement more delay than their first announcement, its not new at airdrop project because we can see many project break their rule actually for payment or reward allocated.

[|MINER|]

They don't even want more people to see their project because they know what will happen once they have lots of participants just like these hype telegram games.

I don't think that is there any project who were really don't want more people as participants. But I know there was most of the projects who wants more participants in their project airdrop because it will increase their reach and also the investment and they have also plan like hidden plan to reduce to participants by amplifying some requirements to get rewards.

[yohananaomi]

In addition to charitable projects, they must also be useful for users. because if the project they have is ordinary, the possibility of success of the project will be small.
However, many project teams do not keep their promises at the beginning, they will provide rewards with a large allocation, but it turns out that what is received is not in accordance with what they promised.

Many project never keep their promised when the project almost ended, cut off reward payment allocation almost find at every airdrop project and looks easily for them change reward allocated.
Other change by airdrop project usually about listing or TGE announcement more delay than their first announcement, its not new at airdrop project because we can see many project break their rule actually for payment or reward allocated.

What you said is about the current incident, almost all airdrops do things like you said, and they cannot be refused because they do not have standard rules and most of them will seek profit from each participant who is currently very much.
So every airdrop seems to be common to make changes when it is almost finished and there are always additional tasks that must be done to reduce the number of rewards to be distributed to a certain minimum before they can be included in the calculation and various other ways, and it is not surprising that you also have to spend funds.

[armanda90]

What you said is about the current incident, almost all airdrops do things like you said, and they cannot be refused because they do not have standard rules and most of them will seek profit from each participant who is currently very much.
So every airdrop seems to be common to make changes when it is almost finished and there are always additional tasks that must be done to reduce the number of rewards to be distributed to a certain minimum before they can be included in the calculation and various other ways, and it is not surprising that you also have to spend funds.

Many airdrop change the regulation few days or weeks left before their project ended, reduce reward allocation until make several another regulation for reducing almost 30% of participants not qualify for receiving airdrop coins. I think airdrop with regulation change few days left before ended almost get failure when listing at the market because can't stopping FUD from airdrop hunter participants how giving bad reputation for that airdrop.
Usually regulation of airdrop change to get smaller participants are qualifying get airdrop coins, most of project won't distribute their airdrop coins for all participants have joined longer time or first time when airdrop opening.

[yohananaomi]

What you said is about the current incident, almost all airdrops do things like you said, and they cannot be refused because they do not have standard rules and most of them will seek profit from each participant who is currently very much.
So every airdrop seems to be common to make changes when it is almost finished and there are always additional tasks that must be done to reduce the number of rewards to be distributed to a certain minimum before they can be included in the calculation and various other ways, and it is not surprising that you also have to spend funds.

Many airdrop change the regulation few days or weeks left before their project ended, reduce reward allocation until make several another regulation for reducing almost 30% of participants not qualify for receiving airdrop coins. I think airdrop with regulation change few days left before ended almost get failure when listing at the market because can't stopping FUD from airdrop hunter participants how giving bad reputation for that airdrop.
Usually regulation of airdrop change to get smaller participants are qualifying get airdrop coins, most of project won't distribute their airdrop coins for all participants have joined longer time or first time when airdrop opening.

Everything you have described in detail here is the reality that happens, and it is very difficult to accept the reality. When it is almost finished all the rules change according to what Dev did. Of course, it is very painful for participants who have done their job well from the start, but what they get is no longer appropriate. it hurts me is that the current airdrop always has to use the funds that are deposited with the excuse of fees and the like but when you have paid a large amount, only disappointment occurs. I think we don't expect too much from the airdrop at this time, and it has already disappointed the participants.

[enwi]

What you said is about the current incident, almost all airdrops do things like you said, and they cannot be refused because they do not have standard rules and most of them will seek profit from each participant who is currently very much.
So every airdrop seems to be common to make changes when it is almost finished and there are always additional tasks that must be done to reduce the number of rewards to be distributed to a certain minimum before they can be included in the calculation and various other ways, and it is not surprising that you also have to spend funds.

Many airdrop change the regulation few days or weeks left before their project ended, reduce reward allocation until make several another regulation for reducing almost 30% of participants not qualify for receiving airdrop coins. I think airdrop with regulation change few days left before ended almost get failure when listing at the market because can't stopping FUD from airdrop hunter participants how giving bad reputation for that airdrop.
Usually regulation of airdrop change to get smaller participants are qualifying get airdrop coins, most of project won't distribute their airdrop coins for all participants have joined longer time or first time when airdrop opening.

Everything you have described in detail here is the reality that happens, and it is very difficult to accept the reality. When it is almost finished all the rules change according to what Dev did. Of course, it is very painful for participants who have done their job well from the start, but what they get is no longer appropriate. it hurts me is that the current airdrop always has to use the funds that are deposited with the excuse of fees and the like but when you have paid a large amount, only disappointment occurs. I think we don't expect too much from the airdrop at this time, and it has already disappointed the participants.

This type of situation definitely creates a drastic feeling of let down and this is so because the efforts too that have been put from the very start are not valued as they should be. It is of course patently unfair when the rules which have been governing a particular activity change all of a sudden without taking into consideration the likely effects for participants. Besides, what was supposed to become a chance, the airdrop due to the additional conditions which need large funds in order to achieve unsatisfactory results. In such circumstances we can understand that we no longer trust anymore and we do not want to aim high anymore. Based on the experience of this practise, it would be wiser to pay more attention to what we are getting ourselves deeper into and only engage ourselves with projects most of which are trustworthy.