Rank inbetween Legendary and Mythical

[PX-Z]

My opinion is that things should continue as before. It wouldn't be fair to users with higher ranks to make the requirements now lower, and it wouldn't seem fair to give those same users (with higher ranks) a higher rank than they have now by lowering the overall requirements. Each user's activity includes all the decisive points.

Yeah for fairness, but the suggestions are reasonable, most ranks have the posts doubled and a bit additional before the next rank but the gap between the Legendary and Mythical is too much. But yeah, i just observed it uses posts counts and not activity then the "other factors" on the linked thread in OP is a secret, why it should be secret in the first place?

[KingsDen]

We don't need to have more ranks, just adjust activity numbers needed for legendary and mythical rank.
Having new ranks doesn't mean much for most people, unless it unlocks something in forum and gives more game-like features.

You never can tell many who are not interested in the ranking system. I have always had this believe that legendary is the highest attainable rank and every other ranks are just like privileges such as being a senator or a president.
I don't know if the mindset is because of BTT background that I have. I only made a fun of it one day on the chat, but then the ranking is just ok this way. Unless for someone who wants to join the mystical league.

[bitmover]

As I just discovered people get stuck in 2000 activity and ranks for no reason, all this discussion becomes pointless.

Until this is fixed and upgraded to a more fair system, there is no reason to discuss anything related to ranks imo.

I joined with several users who are now 2500+ activity and I am stuck at 2000 and the system is working fine according to admin...

[dragononcrypto]

As I just discovered people get stuck in 2000 activity and ranks for no reason, all this discussion becomes pointless.

Until this is fixed and upgraded to a more fair system, there is no reason to discuss anything related to ranks imo.

I joined with several users who are now 2500+ activity and I am stuck at 2000 and the system is working fine according to admin...

This has already been explained to you. If the issue is transparency then say that, not that it isn't "fair" just because you haven't fulfilled rank requirements.

- Hasn't posted enough for activity to unfreeze (1400 would be my guess if so)
- Hasn't been online enough (7 days compared to 11 is a huge difference)
- Didn't reach 2000 activity before the ranking requirements were changed

So this isn't "punishing random users", there are three clear reasons why bitmover could be stuck at 2,000 activity.

This is becoming a disingenuous complaint as the system isn't broken, it's just you don't like it, nor understand it.

Also please stop spamming my topic now with off-topic, you have your own topic already for that

[Freemind]

Yeah for fairness, but the suggestions are reasonable, most ranks have the posts doubled and a bit additional before the next rank but the gap between the Legendary and Mythical is too much. But yeah, i just observed it uses posts counts and not activity then the "other factors" on the linked thread in OP is a secret, why it should be secret in the first place?

Although they are “secrets” and I don't even know with 100% effectiveness how they are linked, there are some things that I have been able to discover just by looking at things a little.

In this post you can see it.

As I just discovered people get stuck in 2000 activity and ranks for no reason, all this discussion becomes pointless.

Until this is fixed and upgraded to a more fair system, there is no reason to discuss anything related to ranks imo.

I joined with several users who are now 2500+ activity and I am stuck at 2000 and the system is working fine according to admin...

bitmover, believe it or not, the system is not broken, the system works. You just have to ask yourself why there are some users who have exceeded 2,000 in activity, and why other users have not. You have the answer in your stats. Now you just have to compare your profile with that of another user who has exceeded 2,000 in activity.

There is the answer.

But make no mistake, it's not just about being connected, other factors come into play.

[dkbit98]

As I just discovered people get stuck in 2000 activity and ranks for no reason, all this discussion becomes pointless.

Just checked my activity and it is above 2180.
System is working perfectly fair already, and don't complain so much now that you have became a senator.
This stuck 2000 number reminds me on the year 2000 when people thought everything is going to stop because of the bug in computers 

[dragononcrypto]

OK have locked suggestion and topic, as clearly there are mixed opinions about this and generally lack of strong support. No point in wasting the communities time further here.

Also as an update from the senate: karma requirements for rank proposals are going well with strong support and down to the last few options, so best not to complicate things here.