Thinking about launching a bounty campaign here

[irfan_pak10]

I was thinking about launching a bounty campaign here but I see there is very less participation in already running bounty campaigns.

[|MINER|]

I was thinking about launching a bounty campaign here but I see there is very less participation in already running bounty campaigns.

Most of the people are now showing aversion towards Bounty Campaign due to lack of good payment and reliable campaign manager.
And besides, telegram's airdrop campaigns have taken a lot of the market of bounty campaigns.
I have known you for a long time as you are a reputable campaign manager on bitcointalk forum. I hope you will come up with a very good bounty campaign that will automatically motivate those who do the bounty campaign to participate.
So I welcome you and your campaign in advance.

[joniboini]

Maybe you can convince your clients to switch to signature campaigns instead. I agree with what has been said above. A lack of good payment is the key reason why people don't participate in bounties, not necessarily because there are no participants for them.

You can also run a trial run for a month or so and see if there is interest in your campaign. I believe a campaign is going to be popular if the funds are escrowed at the very least, as most scam bounties don't bother doing that at all.

[Crypto Library]

Maybe you can convince your clients to switch to signature campaigns instead. I agree with what has been said above. A lack of good payment is the key reason why people don't participate in bounties, not necessarily because there are no participants for them.

You can also run a trial run for a month or so and see if there is interest in your campaign. I believe a campaign is going to be popular if the funds are escrowed at the very least, as most scam bounties don't bother doing that at all.

In fact, not all projects will be suitable for signature campaigns, and many projects have a need for bounty campaigns, marketing or promotion through bounty campaigns. Most cryptocurrency-related projects launch them, especially for their pre-selling and other activities.
On the other hand, as far as I have seen, signature campaigns do not benefit the projects much except in the long term. And signature campaigns are costly compared to bounty campaigns, so I think most cryptocurrency projects use social bounty campaigns.

[dkbit98]

I was thinking about launching a bounty campaign here but I see there is very less participation in already running bounty campaigns.

It depends what are your payment rates and rules of the bounty campaign, but it's not always easy to find good members for that.
If you pay good and have reasonable tasks than you are going to find someone, but don't expect a bunch of applications.

[DYING_S0UL]

In fact, not all projects will be suitable for signature campaigns, and many projects have a need for bounty campaigns, marketing or promotion through bounty campaigns. Most cryptocurrency-related projects launch them, especially for their pre-selling and other activities.
On the other hand, as far as I have seen, signature campaigns do not benefit the projects much except in the long term. And signature campaigns are costly compared to bounty campaigns, so I think most cryptocurrency projects use social bounty campaigns.

Even though bounty campaigns are good for promotions and marketing, I'm not sure how much they are actually effective. I have worked as a spreadsheet validator for a bounty campaign before, and you can't imagine how low quality, fake, shit the performance are. Most of the participants who joins a bounty doesn't even read the basic rules. Yes, it may give the brand some exposure, but none of them are organic.

On the other hand what you said about sig is true. They may be costly but surely worth it, if ran for a long time.

[Crypto Library]

Even though bounty campaigns are good for promotions and marketing, I'm not sure how much they are actually effective. I have worked as a spreadsheet validator for a bounty campaign before, and you can't imagine how low quality, fake, shit the performance are. Most of the participants who joins a bounty doesn't even read the basic rules. Yes, it may give the brand some exposure, but none of them are organic.

I will not disagree with you because I myself know the current situation of bounty participants, maybe there was a time when there were organic campaigners. But currently, I do not see anything other than spam in the bounty campaign. Most of the participants copy each other's posts or repeat the same post, which is just spam.
However, even if it is spam, using it repeatedly gives a little benefit in terms of search ranking.
And if we talk about the reason for this bad situation of the bounty campaign that reduces good projects in bounty is not only the hype of Telegram Air Drop, but another big reason here is the spam and dishonest activities of the bounty participants.

[Findingnemo]

I was thinking about launching a bounty campaign here but I see there is very less participation in already running bounty campaigns.

Compare to Bitcointalk the active users are far less here and people who are active can attain higher ranks who mostly prefer the signature campaign but in Bitcointalk the users who are bounty hunters will never rank up at all.

Still if the bounty is looking potential or brought by the reputed managers then the users might gain interest towards participation.

[electronicash]

maybe you can ask you client to pay in USDT, it looks better that way instead of the token. there have been many of those campaigns that never pay well because the token gets dumped the time its listed in unknown exchange.

if the token is launched on binance lunchepad though, i think there is a chance that the project will be good. your  great campaign manager irfan_pak10, i have been part of your campaign for several times.

[Nheer]

I was thinking about launching a bounty campaign here but I see there is very less participation in already running bounty campaigns.

It depends on what type of campaign you are bringing and I have known you for some years now you are a very honest and trustworthy person, bringing a campaign which is escrowed and pays in usdt or listed token will really be a very good impact for the project and hunters will surely join despite they ain’t much as in Bitcointalk.
  But about what some members said bringing a signature campaign will have a lot of potential and impact to the project cause it seems signature campaigns are really busy and much participation than bounties in this forum. But it depends on what the team said and has it was said it will definitely cost more than bounty allocation, but it will really serves a very good value to the project. 
But you can give anyone a trial either bounty or signature Depends on what you and the project decide at least a month trial. Hunters and many members are really looking forward to work with you Irfan_pak10

[PX-Z]

Well, if bounty campaigns are sure paying with crypto with value already and with decent pay, more people show interest and participate in it. If we're talking token payment with a value that will be take in consideration first in the future, that's a different story — because most of the times, its waste if time.

[Freemind]

@irfan_pak10, i'll try to summarize it as much as possible.

Bounties paid with altcoins that will likely end up with a value close to or equal to 0 won't attract much attention and will probably end up going down in history like many other bounties.

Bounties paid in a well known coin (BTC, ETH, and the like) with payment rates that aren't ridiculous will appeal to many users.

[bayu7adi]

I don't know, but I think it's the same in other forums... bounty enthusiasts have decreased greatly because many people feel regretful about the unequal payment considerations... it happens many times and participants may feel cheated, because their hard work is not appreciated...

Maybe it would be better if campaign managers think about launching bounties with stable coin or top coin payments... that way every bounty hunter will be able to measure the seriousness of the campaign, right? if so, it will increase the confidence of the participants too.

[TryNinja]

As someone who has been part of campaigns for years on bitcointalk, what I can say is that you won't get many good posters or actual legit participants (i.e good accounts to post on twitter or other social networks) unless you're paying in cash (usdt), BTC, eth, etc... if you're paying with future stakes or crypto that aren't actually liquid TODAY, most people won't care.

[bitterguy28]

I don't know, but I think it's the same in other forums... bounty enthusiasts have decreased greatly because many people feel regretful about the unequal payment considerations... it happens many times and participants may feel cheated, because their hard work is not appreciated...

bounty campaigns are also very unpredictable and unstable unlike signature campaigns i am aware that bounty managers are only managers and can only do so much for the members but most bounties pay their members late and even then they’re not sure if the coin/token that’s been given to them will have any value

Maybe it would be better if campaign managers think about launching bounties with stable coin or top coin payments... that way every bounty hunter will be able to measure the seriousness of the campaign, right? if so, it will increase the confidence of the participants too.

there are many skilled and experienced members in the forum that are willing to work in campaigns promoting your brand or platform but you have to value them as much as compensate them for the hard work they put