Well, I don't think BTC is fiat because we don't have a government to determine the value of BTC in the market.
No government is capable of controlling the value of their on the market, if they could do such a thing we would have no inflation and we would have no Zimbabwe dollars, Iranian Rials, or whatever the currency in Syria is that is worse than toilet paper.
The USD is strong because people trust it, just as they trust BTC.
One could argue that the only non-fiat crypto is the ones that claim to be pegged to some gold reserves.
Bitcoin was invented with a purpose, but the purpose has been changing now, and I feel like we use it differently.
This is about definitions, not the purpose, people have a hard time understanding that
- blockchain can exist without tokens
- cryptocurrencies can be centralized
- market cap doesn't mean money invested in crypto
- just because coin is decentralized, in finite supply doesn't guarantee it has any kind of value
The reasoning for the comparison simple, fiat gets its value from the perceived value, Bitcoin does the same, and there is no mountain of gold or pile of money backing every satoshi. Of course, it triggers the hell from bitcoin maxi, but that's the thing, the definition word by word is true, and other aspects can't be further away from the truth.
Also, that's a level 1000 rage-farming article
