How do you know who gave you karma

[Freemind]

I did not mean to say idea especially because whatever a person is saying to another person either in local community or in political board or in sections where one like someone and other don't like it and they try to share their ideas on that topic can lead to negative karma to each other I have seen this one time.

Otherwise, we should give negative karma to scammers and ai shit posters whenever we find one, so next time, they won't do that, but it takes a lot of courage to give someone negative karma because it seems to be a big thing do you get the same thought.

Giving negative Karma to a user is not the end of the world. And sometimes I think that it should not be interpreted as a punishment, but as a wake-up call, to change and improve certain behaviors. For other cases and occasions it should be a punishment.

Sending negative karma constantly without a clear reason can be a kind of abuse as well. And sometimes, it is not really easy to get karma+. However, it is a challenge, it is not so different with merit system.

Abuses are punished in that sense, as you know. As for the Karma system being no different than the BTT merit system, I don't agree with you, Karma is earned more easily and is not tied to users' rank increase. That's why it's so difficult for users to get merits there.

[Z-tight]

Do not worry yourself too much, especially over something that you cannot control. It is obvious that you cannot control who gives you + or - Karma. However, like every good and improving system, there are methods in place to check Karma abuse, so if it becomes a recurring issue, the admin can step in, just enjoy the forum.

[Gposas]

I will like to know who gave me the negative karma and for what reason.

It's obviously not in the hands of users in this forum to spot who gave a negative or positive karma due to reasons of misusage.

I guess the reason for not noticing who gave u a negative karma is because of revenge which will lead to misuse... (It is obvious amongst users that if one feels his points are legit in respect to his source of research, and he ends up getting a negative karma, if he gets to identify the user who gave him negative karma, he would want to payback with double..

All you have to do is continue being active and publishing constructive and helpful post, topics/comments and you'll grow your karmas.
You can check out the rules and regulations from link posted by STUART on what and how to get karmas.

[ZAINmalik75]

Giving negative Karma to a user is not the end of the world. And sometimes I think that it should not be interpreted as a punishment, but as a wake-up call, to change and improve certain behaviors. For other cases and occasions it should be a punishment.

You are right it is not the end of world but I always remained careful in giving negative karma because I don't want to hurt the feelings of someone who made a mistake and not a spammer actually. I guess I have to change my method and be more aggressive, as you recall it is not a punishment but a wake-up call for the receiver to be more accurate and informative in his post.

So, that means we should give negative karma to people making bullshit or low-quality posts, not just to plagiarists and posters.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

I think the karma system is being abused here. I don't know for what reason I was given a negative karma and who gave me the negative karma. I feel this system is gradually losing its value has anyone can just give out negative karma simply because you don't agree with another persons opinion even without doing proper research.

I will like to know who gave me the negative karma and for what reason.

Everyone making a quality contribution will not be given a negative karma, just try to improve on what you're doing and stop making what could be suspicious to others as well as annoying in other for them not to find your profile worthy of negative karma, instead they will give you a positive one, when you post well, i hope you're checking on what others are also posting as well on their profiles.

[alltalk]

Abuses are punished in that sense, as you know.

Sure. Karma abuse deserves to get a punishment.

As for the Karma system being no different than the BTT merit system, I don't agree with you, Karma is earned more easily and is not tied to users' rank increase. That's why it's so difficult for users to get merits there.

Are you trying to say that merits are so difficult to earn in bitcointalk? I assume it's quite subjective, it depends on own perception. In fact, there are many ways to get merits in a quite easy way there. I have also been there for years, there was no much difference with karma system in my opinion. However, we must admit that karma system in altcoinstalks is more friendly.

[Z-tight]

Everyone making a quality contribution will not be given a negative karma,

In normal circumstances that is what is supposed to happen, but you cannot stop someone from clicking on the - Karma just because you disagreed with them or had an argument with them. In such a case, it is karma abuse and the admin will have to step in and punish the offender.

[Freemind]

~snip~
Are you trying to say that merits are so difficult to earn in bitcointalk? I assume it's quite subjective, it depends on own perception. In fact, there are many ways to get merits in a quite easy way there. I have also been there for years, there was no much difference with karma system in my opinion. However, we must admit that karma system in altcoinstalks is more friendly.

Karma here is easier to obtain than merit in BitcoinTalk. Note that it is not associated with reaching new ranks, so it is not associated with more users trying to participate in signature campaigns, so it is not associated with greater competition in signature campaigns that require a higher amount of merit to participate. Everything is a chain, but in this case, without blocks

As I myself would have said in another era, everything is a question of politics.

[Celsius]

I think the karma system is being abused here. I don't know for what reason I was given a negative karma and who gave me the negative karma. I feel this system is gradually losing its value has anyone can just give out negative karma simply because you don't agree with another persons opinion even without doing proper research.

I will like to know who gave me the negative karma and for what reason.

It must be admitted that the forum has improved a lot and many things have been updated here. Previously, if you replied to a post, you would not receive a notification about who replied, but now that addition has been made to the forum and notifications about who sent you a message or replied are easily available.
So, regardless of whether it's called negative karma or positive karma, at some point an update will come out and it will be visible who gave negative karma and who gave positive karma.

[Eroptech]

The question the op ask is something I was thinking of asking before I come across this thread, like bitcointalk if someone should give you Merit you will know who gave you the merit,  the thread and post that was merit. I had one karma and I have been looking for a means to know who gave me the karma and the thread and the post that was given the karma

[Freemind]

The question the op ask is something I was thinking of asking before I come across this thread, like bitcointalk if someone should give you Merit you will know who gave you the merit,  the thread and post that was merit. I had one karma and I have been looking for a means to know who gave me the karma and the thread and the post that was given the karma

No, it is not possible to know which user gives you Karma (positive or negative) and it is not possible to know in which thread/post the Karma is given. This question has been answered many times in other threads similar to this one. Only the administrator, the president and some global moderator have access to the Karma logs to be able to control that there is no type of abuse by a user or group of users. This avoids many problems we have seen in the past.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

I prefer it this way for us not having the ability of knowing who is giving us karma, it has been made simple and easy to do, if you think you deserve it, then work on yourself and render a quality post that may encourage someone to give you one which is positive, but if you're spamming or posting what is not expected of you, then you may have to end up receiving a negative karma and this is the explanation on how it is being done.

[|MINER|]

I prefer it this way for us not having the ability of knowing who is giving us karma, it has been made simple and easy to do, if you think you deserve it, then work on yourself and render a quality post that may encourage someone to give you one which is positive, but if you're spamming or posting what is not expected of you, then you may have to end up receiving a negative karma and this is the explanation on how it is being done.

Moreover, I think if he is getting suspiciously negative karma every day and has a quality post background, then he can talk to the admin or moderators first and later if the admin wants, they will check his log to see if he is actually being abused by karma.
And we have already seen many karma abusers on this forum receive many types of tags as penalties.