altcoinstalks community award? - needed karma

[babo]

as you well know, it would be good to introduce some sort of filter to prevent new accounts from writing
in the previous thread

https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=327327.0

I had quite casually said 100 karma, but speaking in the Italian thread with the miller, he pointed out to me that 100 karma is a very high limit that would make it difficult for many to vote

right, I have no idea how much to set this limit so we better decide together

[babo]

reserved

JUST REMEMBER, categories
- forum geek
- forum gold feather
- forum hero
- best project of 2024


Freemind
icopress
NotATether
PX-Z
Mia Chloe

[hugeblack]

I had quite casually said 100 karma, but speaking in the Italian thread with the miller, he pointed out to me that 100 karma is a very high limit that would make it difficult for many to vote

right, I have no idea how much to set this limit so we better decide together

I think @PX-Z or @bitmover have accurate data about karma. Do a normal distribution plot of that data and target 60% or 80% of the total users. Or in simpler terms, I think 50 karma is enough.

[Lillominato89]

I believe that using karma scores for voting is not so useful, it is a community vote if we put the karma stakes it becomes a vote for only a part of the users and we lose the concept of a united community. Maybe 10 karma points are enough to keep out inactive users and avoid vote manipulation

[Freemind]

I have voted (50) since it is not a high amount and will allow more users to participate. Even so, and as hugeblack says, bitmover and PX-Z will have more information.

I believe that using karma scores for voting is not so useful, it is a community vote if we put the karma stakes it becomes a vote for only a part of the users and we lose the concept of a united community. Maybe 10 karma points are enough to keep out inactive users and avoid vote manipulation

Yes, you are right that it is a community vote, but floor limits must be set or we will see waves of new accounts voting to steer the vote in a specific direction, just as happened with the proposal to associate Karma to increase rank.

[PX-Z]

I had quite casually said 100 karma, but speaking in the Italian thread with the miller, he pointed out to me that 100 karma is a very high limit that would make it difficult for many to vote

right, I have no idea how much to set this limit so we better decide together

I think @PX-Z or @bitmover have accurate data about karma. Do a normal distribution plot of that data and target 60% or 80% of the total users. Or in simpler terms, I think 50 karma is enough.

Based on my data there are

166 users with +100 karma
237 users with +50 karma
356 users with +20 karma
437 users with +10 karma

This data are available on karma logs with the help of sort function https://pxzone.online/altt/karma-log?sort=users_100_karma

[bitmover]

Yes, you are right that it is a community vote, but floor limits must be set or we will see waves of new accounts voting to steer the vote in a specific direction, just as happened with the proposal to associate Karma to increase rank.

This could be easily solved by just putting a minimum karma to vote. ..

I had quite casually said 100 karma, but speaking in the Italian thread with the miller, he pointed out to me that 100 karma is a very high limit that would make it difficult for many to vote

right, I have no idea how much to set this limit so we better decide together

I think @PX-Z or @bitmover have accurate data about karma. Do a normal distribution plot of that data and target 60% or 80% of the total users. Or in simpler terms, I think 50 karma is enough.

Based on my data there are

166 users with +100 karma
237 users with +50 karma
437 users with +10 karma.

This data are available on karma logs with the help of sort function https://pxzone.online/altt/karma-log?sort=users_100_karma

I dont have karma information. Looks like something between 20 and 50 karma is the way to go.
This is a small community, i don't think we need 400 votes..

[Freemind]

This could be easily solved by just putting a minimum karma to vote. ..

That is precisely what I said in my previous post, and that you have quoted in your post...

[Findingnemo]

This could be easily solved by just putting a minimum karma to vote. ..

That is precisely what I said in my previous post, and that you have quoted in your post...

10 Karma looks fair to me, it increases the potential members who can vote as well as mitigates the abusers but I would say we should have number of post restrictions that will do better. Let's say members needed at least 50 posts before the voting began so with this way we can ensure no one is going to abuse the poll by creating new account and beg or farm karma to accomplish whatever their plan is.

[Lillominato89]

I believe that using karma scores for voting is not so useful, it is a community vote if we put the karma stakes it becomes a vote for only a part of the users and we lose the concept of a united community. Maybe 10 karma points are enough to keep out inactive users and avoid vote manipulation

Yes, you are right that it is a community vote, but floor limits must be set or we will see waves of new accounts voting to steer the vote in a specific direction, just as happened with the proposal to associate Karma to increase rank.

I don't know what happened when the karma system was introduced, I wasn't registered on the forum yet, but I trust what you say. However, I am convinced that 100 karma is excessive and would keep too many users out of the vote

50 karma can be there but in my opinion there are also many, many users who have been registered for years on the forum may not have this requirement and it would only bring discontent

20-30 karma could be ideal, it would keep out new fake accounts and only a small part of users

[bitmover]

This could be easily solved by just putting a minimum karma to vote. ..

That is precisely what I said in my previous post, and that you have quoted in your post...

10 Karma looks fair to me, it increases the potential members who can vote as well as mitigates the abusers but I would say we should have number of post restrictions that will do better. Let's say members needed at least 50 posts before the voting began so with this way we can ensure no one is going to abuse the poll by creating new account and beg or farm karma to accomplish whatever their plan is.

I think the vote pool should be changed to 10, 20, 30 and 50 karma options

More than 50 karma is excessive to vote...

[PX-Z]

I dont have karma information. Looks like something between 20 and 50 karma is the way to go.
This is a small community, i don't think we need 400 votes..

For more information, I checked my data again and it has

356 users with +20 karma

I've edited my post above too..

I guess, 356 number of users is fine for voting.

[Freemind]

I think the vote pool should be changed to 10, 20, 30 and 50 karma options

More than 50 karma is excessive to vote...

The amounts that appear in the pool can be changed and each user can vote for what seems most appropriate, which is what I did.

With the information provided by PX-Z we can have a clearer idea of ​​what quantities to use.

[hugeblack]

Based on my data there are

166 users with +100 karma
237 users with +50 karma
356 users with +20 karma
437 users with +10 karma

This data are available on karma logs with the help of sort function https://pxzone.online/altt/karma-log?sort=users_100_karma

number of voters is usually less than 20-30% of the total number of votes, so we will have a maximum number of approximate 80 in the case of 50 karma or 120 in the case of 20/30. So based on this data ~30 is good.

[babo]

in the end we just have to decide on a barrier to prevent people who perhaps don't participate too much in terms of quality in the forum from voting
that's all
establishing a quota must therefore have this impact, I honestly like 50 as a barrier as a number
therefore, this survey will last one week.