How do you go about finding good projects?

[Trongduy]

Yeah, you are right. Some groups can't be trusted, they are only the people who spread false issues. Or they are paid for promoting certain projects. So, we don't fully trust on any social media group, it is better to do own research.

I personally prefer to choose old projects. Or the projects that look like to have good development. I don't choose new projects anymore in this cycle, I can't trust any new project. We have top coins, why we don't choose those top coins projects.

Risks always lie in new projects, especially when they deliberately hide developer team information. I never touch those projects, I'd rather buy BTC for better safety.

New projects are often mentioned or listed on CEXs. Investing in IDO is no longer popular, IEO may be an alternative. Investors can look to top CEXs to participate in IEOs of potential new projects.

[$crypto$]

Yeah, you are right. Some groups can't be trusted, they are only the people who spread false issues. Or they are paid for promoting certain projects. So, we don't fully trust on any social media group, it is better to do own research.

I personally prefer to choose old projects. Or the projects that look like to have good development. I don't choose new projects anymore in this cycle, I can't trust any new project. We have top coins, why we don't choose those top coins projects.

Risks always lie in new projects, especially when they deliberately hide developer team information. I never touch those projects, I'd rather buy BTC for better safety.

New projects are often mentioned or listed on CEXs. Investing in IDO is no longer popular, IEO may be an alternative. Investors can look to top CEXs to participate in IEOs of potential new projects.

I prefer new projects that build communities and they do not disappoint their communities, because from some of their projects that I have seen, their success is also inseparable from the communities that they have successfully built.

While those who also end up becoming failed projects because they fail to build a community, or in other words they disappoint their own community that they have built from the beginning.

[Cryptsafe]

If there is a project that has a large community, it means that the crypto project is good. Because if the project is bad, people will not want to support the project, so automatically if the project is good, it will bring people to want to support it. And this has a big influence on the project.

Large community doesn't guarantee the project to survive well a long time. The projects of meme coins have large community but we don't know how the future of the meme coin projects. Many of meme coin projects stopped after few months or years, we can't expect too much on the new meme coin projects because they have no strong fundamentals. So, we don't solely rely on the factor of large community because it can't guarantee the successful projects.

You are right as large community do not really sustain projects with no utility value or use case, the community is just there to get what they want and they go their way when it seems they can no longer get anything anymore after airdrop distribution. This is mostly common with meme coin projects which are always after the crowd to build the hype which triggers public awareness of the project and this does not often last long because after a short time, the meme coin goes extinct and nobody hears about it again. So it does not matter whether the crowd or large community supports a project but what matters is the utility value of the project to sustain the crowd and even go as far as attracting more crowd to the project as the case may be.

[bounceback]

I prefer new projects that build communities and they do not disappoint their communities, because from some of their projects that I have seen, their success is also inseparable from the communities that they have successfully built.

While those who also end up becoming failed projects because they fail to build a community, or in other words they disappoint their own community that they have built from the beginning.

Absolutely right, most important to know success or not any project depend how their service for community exactly if any project launch an airdrop event have distribute fairly to airdrop participants or not. I found have any project get automatically failure when making community get disappointed and difficult raise up to higher price although their project success when pre sale event.
If any project failed get trusted from community, when listing at market difficult to get high interested from investor want to buy their coins or make as long term investment assets.

[$crypto$]

I prefer new projects that build communities and they do not disappoint their communities, because from some of their projects that I have seen, their success is also inseparable from the communities that they have successfully built.

While those who also end up becoming failed projects because they fail to build a community, or in other words they disappoint their own community that they have built from the beginning.

Absolutely right, most important to know success or not any project depend how their service for community exactly if any project launch an airdrop event have distribute fairly to airdrop participants or not. I found have any project get automatically failure when making community get disappointed and difficult raise up to higher price although their project success when pre sale event.
If any project failed get trusted from community, when listing at market difficult to get high interested from investor want to buy their coins or make as long term investment assets.

Well, that's the point that can't be forgotten. The community will help them spread the good news so that many big investors will eventually be interested in taking part.

The community cannot be underestimated, even though they are not directly part of the team, they also contribute to helping the success of a project. And it cannot be denied that big and successful projects also value their community very well.

[rizqillah]

I prefer new projects that build communities and they do not disappoint their communities, because from some of their projects that I have seen, their success is also inseparable from the communities that they have successfully built.

While those who also end up becoming failed projects because they fail to build a community, or in other words they disappoint their own community that they have built from the beginning.

Absolutely right, most important to know success or not any project depend how their service for community exactly if any project launch an airdrop event have distribute fairly to airdrop participants or not. I found have any project get automatically failure when making community get disappointed and difficult raise up to higher price although their project success when pre sale event.
If any project failed get trusted from community, when listing at market difficult to get high interested from investor want to buy their coins or make as long term investment assets.

Well, that's the point that can't be forgotten. The community will help them spread the good news so that many big investors will eventually be interested in taking part.

The community cannot be underestimated, even though they are not directly part of the team, they also contribute to helping the success of a project. And it cannot be denied that big and successful projects also value their community very well.

The community does have an important role in the success of a project, because a large community will attract new investors to come in.
We understand the fundamentals, the more investors enter the project the more successful it will be.

[MUGNIA]

It's hard to find a good project nowadays, if not researched properly, whitepapers are now different from the old ones, where we can read and see who is behind the scenes of a token project, now whitepapers still need other supporting factors, because most whitepapers are currently the development of old projects that are outdated and updated so that they are like new projects, it is right if you want to invest, then invest in old coins that have given results,

[$crypto$]

Well, that's the point that can't be forgotten. The community will help them spread the good news so that many big investors will eventually be interested in taking part.

The community cannot be underestimated, even though they are not directly part of the team, they also contribute to helping the success of a project. And it cannot be denied that big and successful projects also value their community very well.

The community does have an important role in the success of a project, because a large community will attract new investors to come in.
We understand the fundamentals, the more investors enter the project the more successful it will be.

Well once again, therefore the project cannot underestimate the community, because once again the community has a very important role. If you disappoint them, then be prepared for the project to experience a problem.

The community becomes loyal in waiting from the start of a project being built until it is launched. So I think this cannot be separated between the community and the project that is running.

[Vx1]

It's hard to find a good project nowadays, if not researched properly, whitepapers are now different from the old ones, where we can read and see who is behind the scenes of a token project, now whitepapers still need other supporting factors, because most whitepapers are currently the development of old projects that are outdated and updated so that they are like new projects, it is right if you want to invest, then invest in old coins that have given results,

We must be thorough and careful in choosing a new project, because there are indeed many supporting factors that will make the project successful in the future. Not only the Whitepaper but also the team of the project, and what should not be forgotten is who the partners of the project are and how big the supporting community is.

[erus]

With the issue around the token that Javier Milei (Argentina's President) endorsed, and how badly it turned out, it has become obvious that trusting top names or even celebrity with how you engage with crypto is very risky business.

Including Donald Trump who hyped the $TRUMP token from the Solana blockchain is also now dropping far below its all-time high. We can't trust Javier Milei (Argentina's President) as an endorsement of crypto coins, we still have to be careful in every step.

It has become very obvious that more than ever before doing your own research is extremely important, and this only works if you know how to.

Research by ourselves is the most important and that is our key to stay away from Scam in crypto. Don't forget we also have to DWYOR and DYOR, these two tricks should not be missed.

Some of the things to look out for is the cliche white paper and team behind the project, you also want to lookout for its tokenomics, to ensure the token distribution isn't just a cash-out plan for insiders. You can also use explorers to track the token's movement. These are just some of the few I remember, I'd also appreciate inputs under this for how others research projects they want to invest in.

Whitepaper and core team seem to be a must-watch in every project because I see that these two candidates are very vital, if the team is in doubt then I am sure it will end in negative results.

[Joeboy]

With the issue around the token that Javier Milei (Argentina's President) endorsed, and how badly it turned out, it has become obvious that trusting top names or even celebrity with how you engage with crypto is very risky business.

It has become very obvious that more than ever before doing your own research is extremely important, and this only works if you know how to.

Some of the things to look out for is the cliche white paper and team behind the project, you also want to lookout for its tokenomics, to ensure the token distribution isn't just a cash-out plan for insiders. You can also use explorers to track the token's movement. These are just some of the few I remember, I'd also appreciate inputs under this for how others research projects they want to invest in.

Researching the quality of a project is quite burdensome but vital to enable one invest in the right project. Here are  a few ways that one can use in determining if a project is worth investing in. The first is researching of the background, experience and as well the credibility of the developers and founders of the project.
Another is for one to make research to know if the team members are publicly known or is the project anonymous. Lack of clear transparency is a red flag. And also one can check to know the community engagement which can be done through checking for active discussions on their social media handles.

[rizqillah]

It's hard to find a good project nowadays, if not researched properly, whitepapers are now different from the old ones, where we can read and see who is behind the scenes of a token project, now whitepapers still need other supporting factors, because most whitepapers are currently the development of old projects that are outdated and updated so that they are like new projects, it is right if you want to invest, then invest in old coins that have given results,

We must be thorough and careful in choosing a new project, because there are indeed many supporting factors that will make the project successful in the future. Not only the Whitepaper but also the team of the project, and what should not be forgotten is who the partners of the project are and how big the supporting community is.

in studying a new project we have to do research, as you said we have to know who the partners of the project are. And we look at the community. Does it have a good community and fundamentals. Because this also determines the success of a project.

[erus]

It's hard to find a good project nowadays, if not researched properly, whitepapers are now different from the old ones, where we can read and see who is behind the scenes of a token project, now whitepapers still need other supporting factors, because most whitepapers are currently the development of old projects that are outdated and updated so that they are like new projects, it is right if you want to invest, then invest in old coins that have given results,

We must be thorough and careful in choosing a new project, because there are indeed many supporting factors that will make the project successful in the future. Not only the Whitepaper but also the team of the project, and what should not be forgotten is who the partners of the project are and how big the supporting community is.

in studying a new project we have to do research, as you said we have to know who the partners of the project are. And we look at the community. Does it have a good community and fundamentals. Because this also determines the success of a project.

If I may add, I think I can give some advice for new projects to be better than other projects.

1. Vision must be different.
2. Mission must be different.

I think with a different Vision and Mission from a new project, it will produce a good project and be supported by all communities in crypto.
I have seen the BounceBit project on Binance with its IEO, I think BounceBit has a different Vision and Mission from other projects that have been released on Binance. When it was first listed, BounceBit also went up quite a bit, although now the price has dropped due to the effect of all altcoins going down.
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bouncebit/

[bitterguy28]

Risks always lie in new projects, especially when they deliberately hide developer team information. I never touch those projects, I'd rather buy BTC for better safety.

no transparency is already a huge red flag you want a team that will actively update you on what the current situation of the project is before you even participate in buying or their airdrops if the team is not responsive and very discreet most likely they are only hoping to get profit for themselves from the project and does not care about the project nor the investors

New projects are often mentioned or listed on CEXs.

being listed on cex can be a good sign but not always a guarantee that the project will be a good one especially nowadays i think more cexs are less strict about the projects they will list

[omori]

in studying a new project we have to do research, as you said we have to know who the partners of the project are. And we look at the community. Does it have a good community and fundamentals. Because this also determines the success of a project.

As erus said, uniqueness also plays a role there.

You can have a good community, but without something "revolutionary", so to speak, even just for the initial stage, you won't go far.