Why did Satoshi use GB British English and international English ?

[arabspaceship123]

I've studied some of the 575 posts Satoshi made on Bitcointalk forum. Satoshi's used international English and GB British English so is Satoshi more than one person living in different countries? It's a mystery that's not going to be solved soon but here's some of Satoshi's words that I've picked up on

criticised/criticized
serialisation/serialization
optimised/optimized
optimisation/optimization

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2162.msg28549#msg28549
December 09, 2010, 03:17:53 PM
I came to agree with Gavin about whitelisting when I realized how quickly new transaction types can be added.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2151.msg28228#msg28228
December 08, 2010, 08:21:49 PM
I know I've been criticized for being reluctant about listtransactions.  Let me explain my reluctance


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=632.msg7090#msg7090
August 02, 2010, 08:22:08 PM
The reason I didn't use protocol buffers or boost serialization is because they looked too complex to make absolutely airtight and secure.  Their code is too large to read and be sure that there's no way to form an input that would do something unexpected.

I hate reinventing the wheel and only resorted to writing my own serialization routines reluctantly.  The serialization format we have is as dead simple and flat as possible.  There is no extra freedom in the way the input stream is formed.  At each point, the next field in the data structure is expected.  The only choices given are those that the receiver is expecting.  There is versioning so upgrades are possible.

CAddress is about the only object with significant reserved space in it.  (about 7 bytes for flags and 12 bytes for possible future IPv6 expansion)

The larger things we have like blocks and transactions can't be optimized much more for size.  The bulk of their data is hashes and keys and signatures, which are uncompressible.  The serialization overhead is very small, usually 1 byte for size fields.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2162.msg28302
December 08, 2010, 11:19:24 PM
Changes:
- Fixed a wallet.dat compatibility problem if you downgraded from 0.3.17 and then upgraded again
- IsStandard() check to only include known transaction types in blocks
- Jgarzik's optimisation to speed up the initial block download a little


There's been theories which aren't easy to believe like Jack Dorsey & others being Satoshi. I can't believe them. Do you believe Satoshi was a pseudonym used by more than one person that's why there's differences in written English ?



Note: This topic on Altcoinstalks is almost identical to a topic I made on bitcointalk. I'm posting it in altcoinstalks to have discussions & chats. This note's made because there isn't plagiarism.

[Mia Chloe]

There have been many debates and articles after satoshi left bitcoin became the top cryptocurrency in the market. Basically most of the articles that have read on different websites and from different sources all have similar suggestions that satoshi is not a singular person rather it's more like a group.

One common thing is that they all seemed to have that particular notion based on the fact that in the ideal sense bitcoins base code is too complex for a single person to be able to manage.

[famososMuertos]

OP: If you are going to "study" Satoshi Nakamoto, that's fine, you can learn a lot of things, but wanting to know who Satoshi Nakamoto is is a very different thing.

The first option will help you a lot depending on how you understand it.

The second option won't get you anywhere, and if you do get it, say Hello.


In the sense of studying Satoshi, you should not only go to his posts on the forum, there is much more, including going to the way bitcoin was coded, its architecture, etc.

Lucky.

[TomPluz]

I am not really wondering why the "cultish" study on Satoshi Nakamoto continues up to this day and maybe even into the future as we would love to uncover the details of this man or if the name is actually more of a group name rather than a specific pseudo-name of a person. Satoshi Nakamoto has now been a big mystery that is worth to uncover by looking at the traces he left and I am sure that as long as the man will not surface or that nobody can prove that he can be gone six feet belong the ground, there will be more ideas and opinions on him for as long as maybe Bitcoin is still alive. I am not actually anymore a big fan as to the man's whereabouts but am just amazed at the things that people can uncover on him and theorize from there on. Do we have like a Satoshi Nakamoto Club existing somewhere...or maybe a museum on everything related to the man?

[bitterguy28]

I've studied some of the 575 posts Satoshi made on Bitcointalk forum. Satoshi's used international English and GB British English so is Satoshi more than one person living in different countries?

or maybe he is not a native english speaker and only learned how to speak english from different sources hence the inconsistency because in my country we do speak a lot of english but some may use british or the american spellings of english

There's been theories which aren't easy to believe like Jack Dorsey and others being Satoshi. I can't believe them. Do you believe Satoshi was a pseudonym used by more than one person that's why there's differences in written English ?

possibly. who knows? no matter what i think it really would not change a lot of things satoshi still wouldn’t reappear

though i can tell you this much, an identity is harder to hide if there’s a lot of you so i still think that satoshi is just one person

[target]

What conclusion can you provide with this details?
Satoshi not using the local English and using international English means he is not a US citizen if that is the case. He is aware of the danger he is in which means he must have been exposed to politics besides cryptography.

Nothing can be confirmed even with all the details we get from his posts. But how sooner do you think the authorities figured who Satoshi is since the time he released Bitcoin?

[omori]

OP: If you are going to "study" Satoshi Nakamoto, that's fine, you can learn a lot of things, but wanting to know who Satoshi Nakamoto is is a very different thing.

The first option will help you a lot depending on how you understand it.

The second option won't get you anywhere, and if you do get it, say Hello.


In the sense of studying Satoshi, you should not only go to his posts on the forum, there is much more, including going to the way bitcoin was coded, its architecture, etc.

Lucky.

Speculations about Satoshi - my favorite dish to keep me going knowing people would still try to unravel such a mystery that doesn't need to be solved in the end 

[0t3p0t]

I also heard stories about Satoshi Nakamoto being part of a project for the  secret intelligence and the reason they created Bitcoin is to use it for funding purposes on whatever operations they have internationally. So if they do this worldwide meaning members could be foreigners and locals of a specific country maybe that is the reason why spellings can be different because one, Satoshi could be a foreigner not a native english speaker and two, it is a diversional tactics so that no one will ever sniff their traces since that rumor seems to be a military thing.

Whoever Satoshi Nakamoto is/are I am very thankful to him/them because I came across Bitcoin and I am part of this industry and community.

[arabspaceship123]

The authorities didn't figure it out or else we would've been told. It's shrouded in mystery we can't work out who Satoshi is.

Nothing can be confirmed even with all the details we get from his posts. But how sooner do you think the authorities figured who Satoshi is since the time he released Bitcoin?

[ZAINmalik75]

Did you really read all those posts of him? That's very brave because it would require a lot of time and efforts to sum the discussion even and finding these points. I don't know about british accent or the use of letters American or British Enligh speakers uses but that should not indicate where he is from because he can be a Chinese person.

Anyone can change their way to writing words he is not a dumb to just show his identity like that by writing these letters these must be on purpose and to be honest no one actually keep that much attention to their posts even I sometimes forgot what I wrote in my 2 year old post.

[Findingnemo]

We got one more aspect to speculate about, what if he is not a native English speaker at all? The name Satoshi itself has the origin of Japan so what if he is Japanese?

Well, it doesn't change any of the fact, he gave what he wished and moved on. We don't know what he is doing or even alive but let's hope he is enjoying all the hope he created for the human kind from the control and censorship.

[arabspaceship123]

I've read Satoshi's posts when I was newbie in bitcointalk forum & started a thread about them.

Did you really read all those posts of him? That's very brave because it would require a lot of time and efforts to sum the discussion even and finding these points.

[bayu7adi]

I prefer another possibility, namely that the satoshi account holder is not just one person... so all this time calling satoshi does not mean referring to one individual, it could also refer to a certain group or group that calls it satoshi.... yes, a project like Bitcoin really needs a strong team to be able to become what it is today.. even the team members may still be moving in the shadows to make Bitcoin even more famous...

Relying too much on one person is certainly not a good thing, so making it like a group of people would make more sense so that Bitcoin can last longer.

[omori]

I've read Satoshi's posts when I was newbie in bitcointalk forum & started a thread about them.

Did you really read all those posts of him? That's very brave because it would require a lot of time and efforts to sum the discussion even and finding these points.

It's great to keep his legacy intact and read about it too.
You did a good job!

[arabspaceship123]

It isn't another possibility it's the same I'm writing about. Satoshi doesn't refer to one individual Satoshi's a group.

I prefer another possibility, namely that the satoshi account holder is not just one person... so all this time calling satoshi does not mean referring to one individual, it could also refer to a certain group or group that calls it satoshi....