RWA was once considered a major trend in the crypto market because it could
it could...and here we stop.
What some guys who are thinking we will need a token to survive in the next decade are missing out is the thing that even if something can do a thing, it doesn't mean the actual action is needed.
The concept of RWA is not new, it doesn't even belong to crypto, we had REITs, an established and secure way of doing things.
The only extra thing that RWA on blockchain brought was its weakness, and so many people wondered about it, why would you need a tradable token when the actual assets are the ones being traded, from the start it made as much sense as trading steel in oil or trading real estate in tesla shares.
And as usual, as with LUNA, the actual peg to value mechanism failed...
2. The RWA trend still holds value. We see Tether still succeeding in tokenizing $US, and ChainLink still has oracles providing good support for RWA. The collapse of OM only slows down the progress of RWA in this cycle.
Tether didn't tokenize the USD it created an artificial peg between two currencies, just like for example, Denmark is doing with the Euro.
What RWA does is double speculation on the price of an asset, much like pricing the assets of a company like let's say Microsoft in a token while trading the token on share prices, which of course will go wrong.