Precisely, airdrops also have their own cycle. Typically, they only stand out during the crypto winter when many new projects are introduced and very few hunters are active in the market. When the market becomes vibrant, more hunters participate, and the quality of new projects declines, then the rewards are no longer attractive enough.
Airdrops will still exist, or they will be replaced by some more effective form in the future. It remains the simplest and cheapest way for a project to complete itself and reach the market.
In my opinion, airdrops are not entirely beneficial, or in other words, it has its advantages and disadvantages. First of all, they allow projects to reach the users with little to no expenses. But they also come with the risk of abuse since they are easily accessible by anyone. In this case, projects that give without selection make anything given irrelevant in the correct world. Whether such kind of giving will continue to be practiced is a big question mark. Now if I were asked what I think of Such a system being implemented here, I would say yes, but not the same format. In the future, the reward system may be expected to be more focused on the loyalty of the user, the technical contribution, or even prove that the player has been around for a long time. Thus, it’s not only about registration and expecting the tokens store in your wallet. Accordingly, I believe that this sort of direction is more beneficial to all concerned.