Could Twenty One Capital be more successful than Strategy?

[KryptoBull]

Strategy and Saylor are very popular in the crypto world thanks to their BTC-focused strategy, and the fact that they've gone all-in to accumulate over 500K BTC. Saylor's ideology and vision have also motivated many other companies to accumulate BTC, such as Tesla, MetaPlanet, and GameStop, however, they each hold no more than a few tens of thousands of BTC.

But Strategy's leading position in the BTC accumulation strategy may be threatened by a new fund called Twenty One Capital ^[1]. With the credibility of giants like Tether and SoftBank, I believe Twenty One Capital will soon accumulate even more BTC, even though the BTC price is in a relatively high range compared to Strategy's average accumulation price.

Competition will create momentum for development. The race between Strategy and Twenty One Capital will generate a wave of media attention and simultaneously cause the BTC supply on the market to decrease faster, pushing the market towards a supply crisis sooner, meaning the BTC price could soon reach a new ATH in the near future. However, we also know that Strategy has recently acknowledged the possibility of having to liquidate BTC when necessary ^[2]. Suppose at that time, Twenty One Capital also sells off hundreds of thousands of BTC, the crypto market will be severely damaged!

Personally, I maintain a positive outlook and welcome Twenty One Capital's participation because I think they will indirectly bring me profits. However, I don't idolize any company or individual, they are all just people seeking profits for themselves and their investors

I'd like to know your thoughts on this:

• Do you think Twenty One Capital can compete fairly with Strategy?
• Could the BTC accumulation race push the BTC price to a new ATH by the end of 2025?
• Does the emergence of Twenty One Capital make you want to hold BTC a little longer?

Note:

• My opinion has been presented in a topic, on BitcoinTalk forum.
• This topic on AltcoinsTalks forum has included a minor change in the way my opinion is presented.
• This statement is to avoid accusations of plagiarism.

[TomPluz]

Generally speaking, in most industries the more players working and doing business the more it is healthy for everyone involved and that can be true also here in the cryptocurrency industry. That is why I welcome with open arms Twenty One Capital, a possible contender to the throne now occupied by Strategy of Michael Saylor.

1. Do you think Twenty One Capital can compete fairly with Strategy?
Yes, it can as long as it got the money, the willpower and the strategy involved to buy, hold and make profit from Bitcoin. Of course, since Strategy has been ahead of it, it would maybe come second to Strategy and that is so fine with me. We need more competitive outfits out there to accumulate Bitcoin as this can favor its price.

2. Could the BTC accumulation race push the BTC price to a new ATH by the end of 2025?
Yes, and I am even expecting more. With this bullishness not nipped in the bud, who knows Bitcoin can even go as high as $150K in the next quarter or so. Now, of course, this is putting more enthusiasm to the cake. I am just a regular guy of a holder that can get excited easily when the sentiment is getting so green.

3. Does the emergence of Twenty One Capital make you want to hold BTC a little longer?
Yes, of course, When the market is getting more positive, let's all ride the wave and gain the benefits. Let's sell only at a good price so we can all experience the profits we all deserve. With a news like this entrance of Twenty One Capital to the Bitcoin market, I can really feel that bull run has not yet gone to the cave.

[TryNinja]

I think Twent One Capital could be able to get more money to finance their purchases since they have some heavy guys behind it. For Strategy, Saylor had the first move advantage, but his company doesn't make enough money to pay all their debts and buy more without just selling more stocks. At one point I can't see where he will get more money to finance his buys.

[Mia Chloe]

Strategy and Saylor are very popular in the crypto world thanks to their BTC-focused strategy, and the fact that they've gone all-in to accumulate over 500K BTC. Saylor's ideology and vision have also motivated many other companies to accumulate BTC, such as Tesla, MetaPlanet, and GameStop, however, they each hold no more than a few tens of thousands of BTC.

That's kinda a tough one . On the one hand, the backing of names like Tether and SoftBank definitely kinda gives Twenty One Capital a significant advantage in terms of credibility and potential capital. They could ramp up their BTC accumulation quite quickly if they choose to.

However MicroStrategy has a massive head start with their substantial holdings and the conviction of Michael Saylor, which has created a strong market narrative around their strategy. It's not just about who can buy more BTC, but also about market perception and the influence each of them  actually wields.

[bitterguy28]

But Strategy's leading position in the BTC accumulation strategy may be threatened by a new fund called Twenty One Capital ^[1]. With the credibility of giants like Tether and SoftBank, I believe Twenty One Capital will soon accumulate even more BTC

from what i have gathered, twenty one capital holds 42,000 bitcoins and majority will be held by tether i see a lot of people comparing twenty one capital to microstrategy but right now microstrategy is miles ahead of any company with over 500,000 bitcoin in their holdings

maybe due to big names like tether and bitfinex that is why the hype is massive

even though the BTC price is in a relatively high range compared to Strategy's average accumulation price.

this is exactly why twenty one capital will have less chances of catching up on microstrategy and even if they plan on having the same amount of bitcoins as microstrategy it will take a much bigger amount of money than microstrategy had to put out

[Mia Chloe]

this is exactly why twenty one capital will have less chances of catching up on microstrategy and even if they plan on having the same amount of bitcoins as microstrategy it will take a much bigger amount of money than microstrategy had to put out.

You're actually right though. Twenty One Capital's 42,000 Bitcoin is significant especially with Tether's majority stake kinda creating a lot of buzz. But yeah MicroStrategy is in a different league with over 500,000 Bitcoin. The hype around Twenty One likely comes from the big names involved and I think that's where the momentum for FOMO comes from.

Microstrategy acquired a lot of bitcoins during the dump and it was part of the reasons that the dump ran so fast.

[Findingnemo]

Print unlimited tether and keep buying bitcoin with it, yeah these big corporates are here to disrupt the natural growth. I mean why we need to worry about who own how much?

This 21 capital got more potential to buy than Saylor because it is combination of unlimited money printing machine but I won't be surprised those companies will lose it's value when they over do things.

[target]

The more institutions coming to accumulate BTC, I think a holder of BTC will also be expecting a big profit when the supply finally is fewer in the market. Although I think Blackrock have been buying Bitcoin as well which this 21 Capital is just another institution that wants to come into Bitcoin. There are few others I believe that have been accumulating BTC since.

[MrSpasybo]

I'd like to know your thoughts on this:

• Do you think Twenty One Capital can compete fairly with Strategy?
• Could the BTC accumulation race push the BTC price to a new ATH by the end of 2025?
• Does the emergence of Twenty One Capital make you want to hold BTC a little longer?

1. 21Capital is well-positioned to compete with Strategy in accumulating BTC, as this market always offers opportunities for everyone. No one can stop 21Capital from buying BTC via OTC or Spot, as long as they have a clear plan to raise capital and acquire a significant amount of BTC, they will be able to catch up with Strategy, even though the current gap between them is quite large: over 500K BTC compared to nearly 50K BTC ^^

2. I'm looking forward to this. If 21Capital also actively accumulates BTC as Strategy is doing, the amount of highly liquid BTC will soon be absorbed, causing a supply crisis and driving the BTC price up rapidly.

3. My crypto investment plan doesn't depend on 21Capital, whether they emerge or not, I will still hold to signal. I just hope the buying power from 21Capital can help me take profit at a higher price zone.

[yhiaali3]

Of course, having multiple competitors is a good and healthy thing in the market, both in terms of competition between companies and driving up prices, and in terms of decentralization, as having only one company dominates the market makes it more centralized. Therefore, having competitors is healthy and necessary.

As for Twenty One Capital's ability to compete with Strategie, I don't believe it is possible at the present time, given that Strategie has been in the market for a long time and has purchased large amounts of Bitcoin at a good average price. However, this does not prevent it from being able to compete and perhaps even outperform Strategie in the long term. This is an open market, and the competition is legitimate for everyone.

[hugeblack]

Those planning to buy and hold Bitcoin for the long term will likely try to remain as silent as possible to avoid affecting the market and driving up the price. Instead, they will be eager to spread negative news to obtain coins at a cheaper price. Therefore, I don't expect Twenty One Capital to continue buying large amounts of Bitcoin, beyond a few tens of thousands at best.

[SmartGold01]

Those planning to buy and hold Bitcoin for the long term will likely try to remain as silent as possible to avoid affecting the market and driving up the price. Instead, they will be eager to spread negative news to obtain coins at a cheaper price. Therefore, I don't expect Twenty One Capital to continue buying large amounts of Bitcoin, beyond a few tens of thousands at best.

Of course anyone who wants bitcoin in a large sum wouldn't mind going to create content or spread false news about bitcoin just for bitcoin to dump so that they would have that medium to accumulate enough volume of bitcoin to fill their portfolio, with the mindsets that those who were already holding wouldn't mind dumping their coin just for the market to dip so that they will accumulate more volume bitcoin.