CoinTor.org - Automatic cryptocurrency mixer ❤️ Best of All!

[robelneo]

Trump is a businessman and he sees crypto as an extremely profitable opportunity for personal reasons. It's no wonder that he used bitcoin as a platform to get reelected and it worked.
It would be great if during his government there was no persecution of mixers, this would already help mixers stay around longer.

He already made a profit from his first three months and has four years to make more profit and milk the cryptocurrency.
I think he will be relaxed about mixing as long as no mixing industry is involved in large-scale money laundering by big hacking groups, although this is not possible. 
If ever the Trump administration relaxed on the mixers, we cannot guarantee that it will be be for a long time, as there are changes of administration every four years, and things could change if the Democrats emerge as the winner and resurrect the Biden policy against mixers.

[Report]

For your informations,

If I pay attention to every time I am active in Altcounstalks in every subforum I see advertisements from the cointor.

     

I think ads that continue to arrive at every subforum are very useful for events from the cointor to have a broad expansion scope that is known by each member globally.
Even better than known than the Altcounstalks forum as well, for example from social media, blogs, video platforms that are directed directly to the main website of this cointor , https://cointor.org/en .

[robelneo]

For your informations,
If I pay attention to every time I am active in Altcounstalks in every subforum I see advertisements from the cointor.

Not surprising, they spent to get the attention of mixer users, and the only way to do this is by buying ad space on platforms where mixer ads are accepted

I think ads that continue to arrive at every subforum are very useful for events from the cointor to have a broad expansion scope that is known by each member globally.
Even better than known than the Altcounstalks forum as well, for example from social media, blogs, video platforms that are directed directly to the main website of this cointor , https://cointor.org/en

That's the right thing to do when you're the new player in an industry. You blast your ads to get the attention of users, but they should continue to do this to let users know that they are still here, and they are competitive. It's part of branding so users can easily recall which mixers they should use.

[Wiwo]

Trump is a businessman and he sees crypto as an extremely profitable opportunity for personal reasons. It's no wonder that he used bitcoin as a platform to get reelected and it worked.
It would be great if during his government there was no persecution of mixers, this would already help mixers stay around longer.

He already made a profit from his first three months and has four years to make more profit and milk the cryptocurrency.
I think he will be relaxed about mixing as long as no mixing industry is involved in large-scale money laundering by big hacking groups, although this is not possible. 
If ever the Trump administration relaxed on the mixers, we cannot guarantee that it will be be for a long time, as there are changes of administration every four years, and things could change if the Democrats emerge as the winner and resurrect the Biden policy against mixers.

Most times, what triggers the suspicions of most government os when the mixer services is caught up.in the web of government radar whenever there is a.large scale hacking incidents, and the funds is traced to such mixer, this make it a must for government to climb down on such a service.

But as long as the mixers services within the system operate within acceptable laws, and doesn't over do their activities, it hard before their can run into problems with the government, so as much as all is going well and no incidents of hack and money laundering through the mixer, it all good to go.

[KingsDen]

But as long as the mixers services within the system operate within acceptable laws, and doesn't over do their activities, it hard before their can run into problems with the government, so as much as all is going well and no incidents of hack and money laundering through the mixer, it all good to go.

How will a mixed operate within the acceptable law of the government and still provide privacy services to you?
These are some of the government laws;

• Conduct KYC on all your customers
• Store customers data and submit to the government when needed.
• Allow government to tax your customers

So, how possible is it that a mixer can obey the above and still provide the privacy we need?

[DYING_S0UL]

A lot of things are still unclear to me, so I think it would have been better if CoinTor added additional information to the frequently asked questions section. For example, I wanted to know how the distribution will be handled after the mixing is done. I'm asking this because i saw that users can add up to two receiving addresses. So, after the mixing is complete, does the distribution goes 50-50, or is it a random percentage assigned each time to both addresses?...

[KingsDen]

A lot of things are still unclear to me, so I think it would have been better if CoinTor added additional information to the frequently asked questions section. For example, I wanted to know how the distribution will be handled after the mixing is done. I'm asking this because i saw that users can add up to two receiving addresses. So, after the mixing is complete, does the distribution goes 50-50, or is it a random percentage assigned each time to both addresses?...

For many other mixers, the user has the liberty to adjust the percentage to which address and also has the liberty to choose the mixing time (the longer the mix, the more privacy achieved). I believe it should be the same for CoinTor. Although in the mixing interface, it is not indicated there. And I doubt if such parameters should be seen after generating letter of guarantee. Have you tried generating the letter of guarantee to see what happens next?

[examplens]

Guys from the fee structure I see that 0.01 BTC is the last amount you can mix?

It is the least amount of BTC that should be sent to the address provided by the mixer for mixing. Yes.

@mv1986, do you consider it too high or too low?

This could be considered a high amount, especially if it's a brand-new mixer, without specific recommendations or trusted reviews. Usually, new services offer maximum benefits to attract new users.

[KingsDen]

Guys from the fee structure I see that 0.01 BTC is the last amount you can mix?

It is the least amount of BTC that should be sent to the address provided by the mixer for mixing. Yes.

@mv1986, do you consider it too high or too low?

This could be considered a high amount, especially if it's a brand-new mixer, without specific recommendations or trusted reviews. Usually, new services offer maximum benefits to attract new users.

It depends if CoinTor has a special set of customers they are targeting. But on the average, if the privacy of an average Bob is what they want to protect, they'll definitely need to step down a bit. Besides, every new project always has something unique and different that will attract customers, in this case fees and min mix play important role.

[DYING_S0UL]

A lot of things are still unclear to me, so I think it would have been better if CoinTor added additional information to the frequently asked questions section. For example, I wanted to know how the distribution will be handled after the mixing is done. I'm asking this because i saw that users can add up to two receiving addresses. So, after the mixing is complete, does the distribution goes 50-50, or is it a random percentage assigned each time to both addresses?...

For many other mixers, the user has the liberty to adjust the percentage to which address and also has the liberty to choose the mixing time (the longer the mix, the more privacy achieved). I believe it should be the same for CoinTor. Although in the mixing interface, it is not indicated there. And I doubt if such parameters should be seen after generating letter of guarantee. Have you tried generating the letter of guarantee to see what happens next?

I actually did but there wasn't any feature to adjust the time delay, set any kind of parameters. It just set everything on it's own!
Here is the letter of guarantee. I have edited some parts, for privacy reasons. Also I didn't mix, I was just testing the interface and looking at the process.
I used 2 addresses but it is showing only one. Also there is this mixing "Mode" which nobody knows of.

My two sats would be that if there were flexibility in changing the fees, or adjusting the time delay, or choosing the level of privacy a user wants, or determining what portion is to allocate to each address, that would be awesome.

Code: [Select]


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

CoinTor has generated the address:
Mixing mode: Complete anonymity.
Cleansed coins will be sent to the forwarding address:
bc1qaddresssssssss
N/A
Maximum mixing time is 6  hours.
This offer is valid for 168 hours from
Maximum service fee is: 5% + 0.0007 BTC.
PGP fingerprint:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

....snip

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[Gposas]

I always say this to my friends when they talk about mixers. The real intention of mixers like CoinTor is to provide a platform for users who prioritize privacy to make transactions without being noticed. But there isn't any technology that bad people dont get involved in. Certainly, many are using the mixers for the wrong reasons. That doesn't mean that mixers are for the wrong reason but people will choose to do whatever they want to do with it since they can get their hands on it. Similar thing is happening in the AI industry and that make a lot of individual have a wrong perception on AI.

The problem here is that every development has the side where the bad guys can take advantage of, even when the  aim is for a good purpose.

The fact that privacy is a top priority of mixers paved the way for the bad guys to also privatize and hide trace of their bad acts.

Frankly speaking, if a new development is brought up for a good and positive purpose, the bad guys will be there to make it look like a threat.

[KingsDen]

Code: [Select]


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

CoinTor has generated the address:
Mixing mode: Complete anonymity.
Cleansed coins will be sent to the forwarding address:
bc1qaddresssssssss
N/A
Maximum mixing time is 6  hours.
This offer is valid for 168 hours from
Maximum service fee is: 5% + 0.0007 BTC.
PGP fingerprint:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

....snip

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


It seems everything was moduled together to produce a mix.
How about the transaction fees? From the letter of guarantee, it was said that it's a maximum of 5% + fixed .0007 BTC which I assume is the network fee. Was there provision to adjust the transaction fee? 5% is at the high side, someone could choose to use about 2.5%. If the system fixes this also without a mixer calculator, it's not really fair.

I recommend a review campaign for the project since it's relatively new in the industry.

[DYING_S0UL]

It seems everything was moduled together to produce a mix.
How about the transaction fees? From the letter of guarantee, it was said that it's a maximum of 5% + fixed .0007 BTC which I assume is the network fee. Was there provision to adjust the transaction fee? 5% is at the high side, someone could choose to use about 2.5%. If the system fixes this also without a mixer calculator, it's not really fair.

I recommend a review campaign for the project since it's relatively new in the industry.

Like I said previously, there weren’t any options to choose or adjust anything. I simply put my receiving addresses and clicked on 'mix.' and it took me to the next page, where I was given the address to send my coins to and a link to download the letter of guarantee, nothing more, nothing less. Fixing the mixing fee isn’t fair, as you said. The ability to adjust the mixing fee dynamically based on the level of anonymity a user wants is a must have feature nowadays...

Normally, as a new mixer, brands tries to set competitive mixing fees. But in coinTors case, they seem to be doing the opposite. Not sure why, maybe they’re targeting a different group of users.

A review campaign will certainly help. It would bring out a lot of space for improvements and bugs as they are new to this industry (I assumed).

[AB de Royse777]

Two new FAQ has added on the OP. It's about sending less than lower and higher than high amount.

[Charles-Tim]

Two new FAQ has added on the OP. It's about sending less than lower and higher than high amount.

I guess we much.

I can see it in the OP but not yet seen on the site. I hope this would be added to the site soon.