Blockhain-based messengers

[Morrower]

I use Telegram.
There are plenty of good channels to earn coins.

It's unreasonable to use Telegram for only free coins earning.
I am sure this messenger lost it's secure related trust.
There are so much information from recent news about Telegram data leaking.
Would you still use it for crypto wallets and transactions?

Are you sure that it's possible to use it as a crypto wallet??? Telegram has no such function. I know only Crypviser that has a built-in wallet and it's much more secured than Telegram is

Tired of the fact that everyone constantly offends Telegrams. Telegram is generally the best that now is. Can you give any arguments against?

I can

1. It needs your phone number for registration - what is already not private.
2. It doesn't use end-to-end encryption. They tell they use it for secret chats only which are not available to everyone - only to iOS users.
3. IP address is exposed to operator
4. It has an access to user location
5. It stores all data on the server

Should I continue?

Why are you so worried about the phone number and other parameters? Do you want to commit illegal actions? I only do legal affairs and I'm not afraid to provide my number for registration.

It's not about illegal things - it's all about privacy. My number may be taken from there and one day I'll start to receive lots of spammy messages for instance. It's not very pleasant moment.
Moreover my account may be stolen if someone will get my number. So I'd better choose something that will not collect all the information about me.

[AltLogan]

After all there are many other ways for safe transactions.
Why to use only messengers?
They are not what we need if talk about crypto wallets.

[AltLogan]

I know such a messenger. It's called E-chat. It is based on the blockchain and has its own wallet. I think this is a great discovery. I tried to use it. But I couldn't use it. My colleagues don't know it and don't want to use the new messenger. They are happy with the old messenger and don't want to change anything. They are afraid of change and don't want to spend time learning a new service. I couldn't change their mind.

So then for especially lazy people there is Signal.
It's very user-friendly and no special efforts required to learn how to use it.
But still if your colleagues are good with the old one, then go ahead!

[Morrower]

After all there are many other ways for safe transactions.
Why to use only messengers?
They are not what we need if talk about crypto wallets.

Of course there are, but I wanted to see people's opinion exactly about blockchain messengers that allow crypto and wallets and some else features.
Isn't it comfortably to have everything in one app?

[AltLogan]

After all there are many other ways for safe transactions.
Why to use only messengers?
They are not what we need if talk about crypto wallets.

Of course there are, but I wanted to see people's opinion exactly about blockchain messengers that allow crypto and wallets and some else features.
Isn't it comfortably to have everything in one app?

I understand.
But really, I can hardly believe that such messenger ever exist.

[Morrower]

After all there are many other ways for safe transactions.
Why to use only messengers?
They are not what we need if talk about crypto wallets.

Of course there are, but I wanted to see people's opinion exactly about blockchain messengers that allow crypto and wallets and some else features.
Isn't it comfortably to have everything in one app?

I understand.
But really, I can hardly believe that such messenger ever exist.

Crypviser and e-Chat already exist and you can try it. Who seeks will always find

[hoodie]

Tired of the fact that everyone constantly offends Telegrams. Telegram is generally the best that now is. Can you give any arguments against?
[/quote]

I can

1. It needs your phone number for registration - what is already not private.
2. It doesn't use end-to-end encryption. They tell they use it for secret chats only which are not available to everyone - only to iOS users.
3. IP address is exposed to operator
4. It has an access to user location
5. It stores all data on the server

Should I continue?
[/quote]

so, do all your really necessary correspondence in secret chats, what's the problem? I do not think that you are such an interesting person, that some people are watching you and your correspondence   

[Marryan]

I like the point that such messengers appear. I would also add an encrypted mail to it and it will be perfect!
Just imagine - you open the app and can send mails, chat with friends and do some trading things.
Awesome!

[Marryan]

Tired of the fact that everyone constantly offends Telegrams. Telegram is generally the best that now is. Can you give any arguments against?

I can

1. It needs your phone number for registration - what is already not private.
2. It doesn't use end-to-end encryption. They tell they use it for secret chats only which are not available to everyone - only to iOS users.
3. IP address is exposed to operator
4. It has an access to user location
5. It stores all data on the server

Should I continue?
[/quote]

so, do all your really necessary correspondence in secret chats, what's the problem? I do not think that you are such an interesting person, that some people are watching you and your correspondence   
[/quote]

I think it's not about correspondence only as some people do crypto transactions using messengers for example and they don't want to leak information dedicated to it for sure.

[hoodie]

Tired of the fact that everyone constantly offends Telegrams. Telegram is generally the best that now is. Can you give any arguments against?

I can

1. It needs your phone number for registration - what is already not private.
2. It doesn't use end-to-end encryption. They tell they use it for secret chats only which are not available to everyone - only to iOS users.
3. IP address is exposed to operator
4. It has an access to user location
5. It stores all data on the server

Should I continue?

so, do all your really necessary correspondence in secret chats, what's the problem? I do not think that you are such an interesting person, that some people are watching you and your correspondence   
[/quote]

I think it's not about correspondence only as some people do crypto transactions using messengers for example and they don't want to leak information dedicated to it for sure.
[/quote]


with the help of the Telegram, it is now possible to carry out various kinds of transactions absolutely calmly and without fear. he is really safe. In this messenger, no one will definitely steal your data.

[Bica]

I don't like services that have many functions. Developers chase after quantity and forget about quality. A company may produce good refrigerators, but their vacuum cleaners will be of poor quality. It's my opinion. I think the combination of the messenger and the wallet will increase the field for the activity of scammers.

You can find scammers everywhere - not only in messengers. You just have to choose the right trader before you send money to him.
And why do you think that all-at-one messengers are bad? Those that have built-in wallets made a good encryption.

Cryptomessengers are too young for my attention. They aren't tested by a large number of people. I can't trust them as a blind man.

[Bica]

After all there are many other ways for safe transactions.
Why to use only messengers?
They are not what we need if talk about crypto wallets.

Of course there are, but I wanted to see people's opinion exactly about blockchain messengers that allow crypto and wallets and some else features.
Isn't it comfortably to have everything in one app?

Why combine everything? Wallet is used for transactions, messenger is used for communication. I will not communicate anymore if I start receiving coins for messages. I don't want to earn on my comrades.

[Kinal]

I know such a messenger. It's called E-chat. It is based on the blockchain and has its own wallet. I think this is a great discovery. I tried to use it. But I couldn't use it. My colleagues don't know it and don't want to use the new messenger. They are happy with the old messenger and don't want to change anything. They are afraid of change and don't want to spend time learning a new service. I couldn't change their mind.

Of course people get used to something they know, but I think that if you want privacy, especially when you deal with crypto - it's a good app!
I'm already tired of all this leaking of information - that's why I want to try something new and encrypted.
And what messenger do you use now?

I use Skype and WhatsApp. Nobody is interested in anything new. Scares people new. I was very surprised. I fight and decided to leave everything.

[Kinal]

I use Telegram.
There are plenty of good channels to earn coins.

It's unreasonable to use Telegram for only free coins earning.
I am sure this messenger lost it's secure related trust.
There are so much information from recent news about Telegram data leaking.
Would you still use it for crypto wallets and transactions?

Are you sure that it's possible to use it as a crypto wallet??? Telegram has no such function. I know only Crypviser that has a built-in wallet and it's much more secured than Telegram is

Tired of the fact that everyone constantly offends Telegrams. Telegram is generally the best that now is. Can you give any arguments against?

I can

1. It needs your phone number for registration - what is already not private.
2. It doesn't use end-to-end encryption. They tell they use it for secret chats only which are not available to everyone - only to iOS users.
3. IP address is exposed to operator
4. It has an access to user location
5. It stores all data on the server

Should I continue?

Why are you so worried about the phone number and other parameters? Do you want to commit illegal actions? I only do legal affairs and I'm not afraid to provide my number for registration.

It's not about illegal things - it's all about privacy. My number may be taken from there and one day I'll start to receive lots of spammy messages for instance. It's not very pleasant moment.
Moreover my account may be stolen if someone will get my number. So I'd better choose something that will not collect all the information about me.

Did it happen to you? Can you tell more, please. I hope it can help convince my colleagues of the need to choose a new messenger.

[Morrower]

I don't like services that have many functions. Developers chase after quantity and forget about quality. A company may produce good refrigerators, but their vacuum cleaners will be of poor quality. It's my opinion. I think the combination of the messenger and the wallet will increase the field for the activity of scammers.

You can find scammers everywhere - not only in messengers. You just have to choose the right trader before you send money to him.
And why do you think that all-at-one messengers are bad? Those that have built-in wallets made a good encryption.

Cryptomessengers are too young for my attention. They aren't tested by a large number of people. I can't trust them as a blind man.

If all of us will behave like you do - no one will test anything ever! It' not so hard to download an app and check what is it.
If you won't like it you always have a right to delete it.
It's so simple, bro