Why are bounty hunters guilty?

[mamun777]

They are all looking for excuses during this bear market.  It seems these projects want to use the bounty hunters for free exposure.  Then when the bounty hunter succeed in getting their project talked about and they have a great ICO then the bounty hunters are evil dumpers not allowed to get paid for their work.  Lovely job isn't it.  The real reason the coin is dumping is because the project leads are dumping. Not the few scraps we hunters get.

[Bruks]

bounty hunter received only a few percents of the allocation alone and that I don't think it can be said the decline stemmed from a bounty hunter. I think it's a reasonable thing to happen and of course depending on the team behind it also can run or not. If indeed nice of course despite the price drops will be up again in some time.

[bagas79]

I think the problem is in marketing, they don't use the right strategy, if they blame the bounty hunters it's wrong, because with the bounty hunter marketing ICOs are helped. Marketing should think of a good way so that the ICO is successful, not blame the bounty hunters.

[vegasus]

I don't think it's wrong from a prize hunter if the price of a token or coin goes down. Though the intention of the bounty hunter is only the Project Bounty campaign they have. If indeed the investor cannot get the money back, it means that it is wrong from the project team who cannot run the project properly and suffer losses.

[aji678]

Come to think of it, percentage allocated to bounty reward are little compared to what investors have control over. I am not totally disproving the fact that bounty hunters dump coin but the blame also fall on investors whose bonuses are more than bounty rewards and can also dump since bonuses are not paid for.

[Shahinaz]

I don't think all hunters make mistakes, but if compared, about 30% hold their coins so they get a profit,
but their right also if they want to sell that they can at least want to enjoy the results of their work.
that is to blame is the ICO project which gives a big bonus. Why don't they give coins that are more valuable to reward participants if they are afraid their tokens will fall? and give gifts to airdrop first and hunter after that

[ayatoslaw]

I don't think all hunters make mistakes, but if compared, about 30% hold their coins so they get a profit,
but their right also if they want to sell that they can at least want to enjoy the results of their work.
that is to blame is the ICO project which gives a big bonus. Why don't they give coins that are more valuable to reward participants if they are afraid their tokens will fall? and give gifts to airdrop first and hunter after that

a good strategy, give airdrop prizes first and then to the bounty hunter.
and it's true, bounty hunters can't be blamed, what I have to blame is marketing and concept,
actually it is anticipated that the coin does not dump.

[Nazir]

there is no doubt bounty hunters have played a position inside the present day doom on the market, considering they sell off maximum in their cash while indexed on exchange. So bounty hunters can't be completely blame unfastened.

[Goku01]

They have committed a major error to accuse abundance seekers. Abundance seekers are guiltless in this issue since they just hold a little measure of tokens. Who hold greater sums? I think whales, enormous brokers, and designers have a bigger measure of tokens. Despite the fact that abundance seekers make the rates diminish, it is just briefly. Quit pointing the finger at them, think practically.

[Alpha]

Probably, bounty hunters are the less important group in the project.
People cannot blame the big holders so the tendency is to pinpoint the bounty hunters. In fact, in some cases it is right due to some hunters that doesn't have enough knowledge to deal trading.

[Jaguar]

Guilty for what? The price dump could be because of manipulators and not from bounty hunters. Hunters can dump the price but they cannot maintain dumping for having small amount of tokens.

[Mikam]

in some cases this is true because some hunters do not have enough knowledge to trade. Perhaps, gift hunters are a less important group in this project.
One cannot blame the big holder so the tendency is to determine the prize hunter.

[sampoerna]

Basically, gift hunters are not wrong as long as they can be consistent in their work. In fact, the risk is wrong from the Project Bounty itself. Project failure is caused by the absence of incoming investment. The edges of it all must be wrong from the project. Because the project makes the project less attractive so no investors enter.

[bhm45]

Actually, most bounty hunters I have seen usually sell off their tokens when they receive their tokens and this causes massive drop in price of a project and an investor would be on deficit on his invested capital. In my opinion, its not only bounty hunters that are guilty. Also, private sale investors also sell off because they usually receive massive discounts and this makes them be in huge profit when tokens are listed.

[May]

Gift hunters cannot be fully blamed. There is no doubt the prize hunters have played a position in today's destruction on the market, considering they sell the maximum in their cash while being indexed on the exchange.