follow us on twitter . like us on facebook . follow us on instagram . subscribe to our youtube channel . announcements on telegram channel . ask urgent question ONLY . Subscribe to our reddit . Altcoins Talks Shop Shop


This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here Ads bidding Bidding Open

Author Topic: Lawsuit Against Nano Devs Commences, ‘Rescue Fork’ Requested for BitGrail Funds  (Read 1413 times)

Offline PRIBO247

  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Activity: 1071
  • points:
    900
  • Karma: 6
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Referrals: 3
  • Last Active: April 09, 2019, 01:08:13 PM
    • View Profile

  • Total Badges: 21
    Badges: (View All)
    10 Posts First Post Sixth year Anniversary
A class action lawsuit that was filed in April of 2018 has
commenced against the creators of the Nano ( NANO)
cryptocurrency, in which the plaintiffs allege that developers
“violated federal securities laws.” The lawsuit is being handled by
Silver Miller Law and Levi Korsinsky, LLP, both US-based firms
specializing in securities fraud and/or investment loss.

Specifically, the suit claims that developers of Nano - which was
previously called “RaiBlocks” before a rebrand earlier this year -
“recklessly” encouraged plaintiffs to buy the cryptocurrency on a
little known Italy-based exchange called BitGrail, which at the
time hosted most of RaiBlocks’ trading volume.

BitGrail (now apparently non-functional ) claimed to be hacked last
February, but was generally accused of conducting an exit scam .
The event caused the value of then-RaiBlocks to plunge 20% in
price. Almost $200 million worth of RaiBlocks tokens were either
stolen or removed from the exchange.
Notably, the founder of BitGrail Francesco Firano asked the
RaiBlocks(/Nano) developers at the time to hardfork the currency
in order to return users’ funds to them, à la the Ethereum hardfork
which birthed Ethereum Classic. The developers refused.
However, the current lawsuit formally requests that Nano
developers conduct such a “‘rescue fork’ or some other procedure”
in order to reimburse burned investors.

Securities Violation
There are altogether eleven charges brought against the team, two
of them being often-cited violations of Sections 12(a)(1) and 15(a)
of the US Securities Act of 1933 .
The filing claims that “the success of the investment opportunities
and any potential returns thereon were entirely reliant on
Defendants’ ability to maintain and expand the functionality and
popularity of [RaiBlocks/Nano], thus providing financial returns to
investors.”

Whether or not - and which - cryptoassets are considered
securities under US law is still a murky and inchoate issue.
Although at least two of the best known digital assets, Bitcoin and
Ethereum, have been grandfathered in as non-securities, perhaps
the next-best known one - XRP - is still languishing in legal limbo.

https://www.cryptoglobe.com/latest/2019/01/

Altcoins Talks - Cryptocurrency Forum


This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here Ads bidding Bidding Open


 

ETH & ERC20 Tokens Donations: 0x2143F7146F0AadC0F9d85ea98F23273Da0e002Ab
BNB & BEP20 Tokens Donations: 0xcbDAB774B5659cB905d4db5487F9e2057b96147F
BTC Donations: bc1qjf99wr3dz9jn9fr43q28x0r50zeyxewcq8swng
BTC Tips for Moderators: 1Pz1S3d4Aiq7QE4m3MmuoUPEvKaAYbZRoG
Powered by SMFPacks Social Login Mod