Bounty Teams' Response

[Zed0X]

I am aware that there are bounty managers here like EmoneyABC, ZeosX, and recently just found out about Ataw. If admin and other members of the forum sponsored campaigns would also respond, I would highly appreciate it.


I would like to ask all of you on how you'll respond to the following:

1. Bounty campaign extension
- Will the team ask for an increase in the bounty pool?
- Will the team close the registration and allow only those participants prior to extension?


2. ICO team inserting rules after the campaign
- Will the team allow ICO teams add rules like exchange voting and require hunters to participate?
- What would be the bounty team's response if ICO teams would withhold the bounty rewards to force hunters to participate? 

[ZionRTZ]

Good questions.

I would also like to know if these matters are being discussed by BM's before an agreement is made.

[Master107]

I would better suggest try to be the business manager to understand fully what matters considering the unstable market and the thousands participants which in different cultures, tradition, and beliefs.

Anyway you have really a potential person.
Maybe I am late about your business manager status? 

[admin]

what is Ataw ?

[Zed0X]

what is Ataw ?

One of the members here admin.

I would better suggest try to be the business manager to understand fully what matters considering the unstable market and the thousands participants which in different cultures, tradition, and beliefs.

Anyway you have really a potential person.
Maybe I am late about your business manager status? 

No, I am not a bounty manager. I just raised these questions since this has been the trend for quite sometime now. I'm wondering if BM's already had these thing in mind even before ICOs extend or add rules.

[admin]

i have no idea what this topic about, can someone please help me understand

[Leonardo]

i have no idea what this topic about, can someone please help me understand

Each bounty campaign has an allocation of tokens/coins to reward its bounty doers, it's called bounty pool. When a bounty campaign extends its duration for some reason, there're some consequent issues, for example bounty pool must be expanded either to be worth bounty doers' extra effort or bounty registration should be closed during the extra time to protect old participants' benefit. That's his first two questions:

1. Bounty campaign extension
- Will the team ask for an increase in the bounty pool?
- Will the team close the registration and allow only those participants prior to extension?

Regarding two latter questions, some dev teams behind those ICO projects propose unfair rules after the bounty campaign finish, such as requiring bounty hunters to vote for their coins/token to be listed on a specific exchange. If bounty hunters don't, they will not carry out the token distribution. Anyway, I think these two are beyond a bounty manager's decision.

[Zed0X]

i have no idea what this topic about, can someone please help me understand

Each bounty campaign has an allocation of tokens/coins to reward its bounty doers, it's called bounty pool. When a bounty campaign extends its duration for some reason, there're some consequent issues, for example bounty pool must be expanded either to be worth bounty doers' extra effort or bounty registration should be closed during the extra time to protect old participants' benefit. That's his first two questions:

Thanks for pitching in.

1. Bounty campaign extension
- Will the team ask for an increase in the bounty pool?
- Will the team close the registration and allow only those participants prior to extension?

Regarding two latter questions, some dev teams behind those ICO projects propose unfair rules after the bounty campaign finish, such as requiring bounty hunters to vote for their coins/token to be listed on a specific exchange. If bounty hunters don't, they will not carry out the token distribution. Anyway, I think these two are beyond a bounty manager's decision.

That's exactly the unfair rule why I started this thread. We're forced to comply while our bounty rewards were held hostage.

As of now, it seems that BM's are treated as mere employees of these ICOs and are merely told what to do. So I am wondering, given that changing bounty rules has been going on for a while now, isn't it time for BM's to start taking these into considerations and include them in the terms before accepting a deal with these ICOs?