Aboveboard Founder Claims 'Nobody Is Buying' STOs

[sirty143]

Andy Singleton, the founder of securities exchanges Aboveboard, has published an article asserting that the security token offering (STO) market is “lifeless.” While Singleton acknowledges the efficiency savings facilitated by the introduction of distributed ledger technology to the securities industry, he argues that current offerings are plagued by poor liquidity and inadequate disclosure,. resulting in very little demand from investors.

‘Nobody Is Buying’

In an article titled “The real STO market outlook: near death,” Singleton states that despite the “squad of zombie startups” that are “announcing infrastructure and posting deals for sales … nobody is buying.”

Singleton asserts that the security token offerings conducted thus far comprise “bad investments” from the perspective of prospective buyers,” adding that the offerings do not have sufficient liquidity and typically incur significant fees.

The Aboveboard founder stated: “The non-tokenized private security market absorbs about $50B a day in new supply, proving that there is a massive base of buyers for desirable securities.” By contrast, Singleton estimates that less than 1,000 individuals have participated in security token offerings.

Inadequate Liquidity and Disclosure

Singleton states that security token offerings are not designed to trade with significant volume, also asserting that STOs fail to “disclose enough information to allow a buyer to determine a fair price.”

“Funds like Bcap and SpiceVC can only be purchased by US investors under special circumstances,” Singleton continued. “If they accept US accredited investors, they can only have 100 shareholders. They may create PFIC tax liabilities … And, they are tiny issues — under $20M in total float. The problem is not just that the market is early and it will grow. These securities are fundamentally not designed in a way that will allow much trading at any point in the future.”

Further, Singleton asserts that many unregulated initial coin offerings (ICOs) have tried to “relabel” their fundraising offers as “equity securities” following increasing action taken against ICOs.

STOs Facilitate ‘Important’ Technological Innovations

Despite his criticisms of current security token offerings, Singleton has stated that STOs facilitate a number of “important” technological innovations pertaining to the securities industry, emphasizing “the fact that you can have real-time royalties and voting” using security tokens.

Highlighting the need for STOs to add value to the securities sector, Singleton stated: “Putting an existing security into a blockchain wrapper doesn’t add much value to that security. The market will really take off when we see new types of deals and business models that require the flexibility of the tokenized format … Bitcoin is valuable because it did something completely new — it monetized and coordinated the efforts of an open source community.”

Source:  BITCOIN.COM

[Alcor]

As a bounty hunter, I don’t really welcome the transition of ICO projects to STO. For the time being, I have little idea how securities can be given to a cryptocurrency shell and what will come of it in the future. I participated in the ICO under the name Datablockchein on the btt forum and under the end of the ICO her team announced that they are switching to standard STO and securities. This is all stuck for now and I think that we just won’t get any reward. Began to manipulate the requirements of what we need to do, this is accompanied by short deadlines, confusion, technical inconsistencies. In general, I am still more hostile to STO than positively.
I hope that ICO projects will be revived when they are regulated by states and the level of fraud in them will fall to a minimum.