Europe, specially Germany, already said they will spend much more money than they have. Argentina isn't doing that. It is reducing debts over the years .

Ofc bonds in Europe are much more solid than bonds in Argentina. But you are thinking the wrong way.
Emerging markets pay way higher interest rates. If you had put money in Argentina 2 years ago, you would probably have made more money than investing in cryptocurrencies.

In view of the existing circumstances, even for large projects such as Ethereum, mining has begun to be called off. This just prove that the essence of crypto was not in the creation of machines that dig new blocks but in the need among people to come up with something that is more fair and less oppressive.

so lets say 2% of 1000 coins is 20 coins a year at 36,000 a year income if you simply cash the interest  and you put up $250
for 10,000 coins it is 200 x 1800 = 360,000 a year income if you simply cash the interest and you put up $2500
and for 100,000 coins it is 2000 x1800 = 3,600,000 a year income if you cash the interest and you put up $25000

I do disagree but mostly because of the time gap ETH ath was in 2021
solana ath was this year.

That is dumbfounding indeed!
Why would anybody want to go to prison? It should be a place that you do not like going to, not a place you want to go to.

This might be a naive opinion, but why don't US companies simply order the products form China to their European subsidiaries when they want to buy something? And then from Europe they can pay someone to ship the order to them in their name or something. It technically skirts the tariffs, but I don't suppose that regulations would allow that (plus it would make Trump quite unhappy that US companies are basically evading his executive order).

We all know that printing more money will just create inflation and recession.

I have some faith in vitalik's blockchain