This is very interesting.

I am afraid that such situations may lead to regulations over cryptography, which are very bad for privacy and the security of everyone.

If you read the cypherpunk manifesto , Eric Hughes deplore those regulations.

Take a look:

Quote

Cypherpunks deplore regulations on cryptography, for encryption is fundamentally a private act. The act of encryption, in fact, removes information from the public realm. Even laws against cryptography reach only so far as a nation’s border and the arm of its violence. Cryptography will ineluctably spread over the whole globe, and with it the anonymous transactions systems that it makes possible.
https://nakamotoinstitute.org/library/cypherpunk-manifesto/

Yes, in the future I do plan to create a small team to help manage operations, marketing, and support. However, for now it’s not yet feasible due to current resources and the early stage of the project’s growth. I believe in building a solid foundation first before expanding.

I agree with you completely — user feedback and visibility are essential. I’m already considering investing in some type of campaign to increase awareness and credibility. A review or signature campaign is definitely on my list, and I already have some ideas in mind that I hope to put into action soon.

Quote from: bitmover on April 29, 2025, 03:15:43 AM

This is where phising becomes dangerous. Sometimes you did your research, but you use some other address instead of  mixtum.io and then its gone...

Some adblockers are doing the basic job to protect against known phishing scams, but we can also use DNS based filtering, or create community campaigns to report all the scam and cloned websites.
Another tactics I noticed scammers use is to create mixer review websites with real reviews and rating, but they are using fake links for mixers.

...
And i can't remember the exact place but I know I've read somewhere where the manager of this campaign said that mixtum campaign this time will be running for a long term, though I understand long term may likely mean different period of times for different people but let's hope it's for over a year, and let's also pray and hope that government become more friendly with mixers and clampdown on their site anymore, then we have the assurance that legitimate mixers that are here to provide long term service will freely operate without any issues from regulators.

I'm just referring to your question about 5 BTC being worth roughly the amount I wrote - with the potential to be worth much more in the future. Anyone who has that amount and keeps it in any form of hot wallet (this includes all non-air-gapped wallets) should know how much risk they are exposed to - and all this for a few hundred $, which is how much a good air-gapped wallet costs, or even less a cold wallet that can be made on an old computer.

I'm not saying that someone will remotely hack Ledger or Trezor devices (or similar ones) tomorrow, but to me, avoiding that risk is worth a lot more than the $200-$300 you have to pay for it today.

Trump's policy of increasing tariffs against China has indeed had an impact on the global economy, including bitcoin.
But when the tariff war is over and returns to normal, everything will be fine as it is now.

There is no FUD and any policies from trump that have disrupted the global economy.
Now it's time for bitcoin to reach the new ATH faster.

Investors who exit first are likely to enter and bitcoin dominance increases and eventually when the dominance drops,
but the bitcoin price stabilizes above the new ATH, then the altcoin starts to recover.

Hardly anyone likes XRP hahaha
It's probably better for it to be in ETFs which may be more the coin's target audience
I think it's only a matter of time before there's an XRP ETF in the United States too