What are the Criteria to Participate in Campaign?

[bitpr0]

At the end its the bounty manager who decides that.

[Agbe]

We must also remember that the administrator is working on an update to the karma system that will consist of the need to have a specific amount of positive karma in order to reach a new rank

That is nice move but if the admin is working on the karma system to tally with ranks then he has to upgrade those who have 0, 1, 2 or less  karma and they are already in Full Member and above because of they teleported from another forum. So that when the when the Karma is used to rank up then those people will not be affected again.

[Freemind]

That is nice move but if the admin is working on the karma system to tally with ranks then he has to upgrade those who have 0, 1, 2 or less  karma and they are already in Full Member and above because of they teleported from another forum. So that when the when the Karma is used to rank up then those people will not be affected again.

When the new karma system goes live, the administrator will have to adjust the ranks of some users to comply with the rules of the new karma system. The ranks of the affected users will be adjusted to the position indicated by the new rules and from that moment on the ranks of all forum users will be governed by these rules. Nothing will be left to chance so that all users have the same possibilities. We just have to be patient so that the administrator can implement it in the forum.

[Z-tight]

At the end its the bounty manager who decides that.

Absolutely, and that is why i don't think it is necessary to be concerned about what the criteria is exactly. Just be a regular forum user, make quality posts, engage in discussions, don't spam, etc, and leave the bounty manager to make their choice of choosing you or not. But if you are a quality user, and there is enough campaigns in the forum, you'll surely get selected into one.

[armanda90]

At the end its the bounty manager who decides that.

True, finally bounty manager have full controlling take decision for participating approving or not matter how good your account reputation or how many karma do you have. I memorized well with some bounty campaign manager on bitcointalk forum always priority with their citizen only. Most of the participants in their campaign dominance by their citizen with the same board on local post. I think its not worth behind have most experienced manager reduce the participant in his campaign when having around two until three user with the same country.
I think you are remember who is the manager only priority with his citizen although have many user have good criteria but failed for approving.

[Freemind]

True, finally bounty manager have full controlling take decision for participating approving or not matter how good your account reputation or how many karma do you have. I memorized well with some bounty campaign manager on bitcointalk forum always priority with their citizen only. Most of the participants in their campaign dominance by their citizen with the same board on local post. I think its not worth behind have most experienced manager reduce the participant in his campaign when having around two until three user with the same country.
I think you are remember who is the manager only priority with his citizen although have many user have good criteria but failed for approving.

Although I have always respected the decision and individual criteria of the managers of the signature campaigns, I believe that only selecting participants who have a specific nationality does not make much sense. I don't know who you are referring to, but any user of any nationality should have the same chances of participating. There are good users in every country in the world with opinions as valid as any other.

[Cantsay]

True, finally bounty manager have full controlling take decision for participating approving or not matter how good your account reputation or how many karma do you have. I memorized well with some bounty campaign manager on bitcointalk forum always priority with their citizen only. Most of the participants in their campaign dominance by their citizen with the same board on local post. I think its not worth behind have most experienced manager reduce the participant in his campaign when having around two until three user with the same country.
I think you are remember who is the manager only priority with his citizen although have many user have good criteria but failed for approving.

Although I have always respected the decision and individual criteria of the managers of the signature campaigns, I believe that only selecting participants who have a specific nationality does not make much sense. I don't know who you are referring to, but any user of any nationality should have the same chances of participating. There are good users in every country in the world with opinions as valid as any other.

There are times when the service that’s been promoted (via signature) is targeting people from a specific country that’s when campaign managers add that to the campaign thread, but saying that the campaign select participants based on the fact that they are from the same country is not true.

I have worked with several campaign managers in Bitcointalk and none of them are from my country, it just depends on what you have to offer, how you make your post and how well you know about the service that’s being promoted (most persons don’t even know what they are promoting) - nationality is not a factor (except in rare cases).

[hugeblack]

Although I have always respected the decision and individual criteria of the managers of the signature campaigns, I believe that only selecting participants who have a specific nationality does not make much sense. I don't know who you are referring to, but any user of any nationality should have the same chances of participating. There are good users in every country in the world with opinions as valid as any other.

Sometimes interaction in the local board may be a reason for giving priority to the participants there. For example, the Russian and Turkish languages ​​had high interaction in bitcointalk. Sometimes campaign managers prefer diversity so that one member is added to each local council or specific council, and so on.
Therefore, when there are a greater number of open slots available, the chance of you joining a campaign will be higher based on normal criteria such as karma, activity, popularity, trust, etc.

[Freemind]

Sometimes interaction in the local board may be a reason for giving priority to the participants there. For example, the Russian and Turkish languages ​​had high interaction in bitcointalk. Sometimes campaign managers prefer diversity so that one member is added to each local council or specific council, and so on.
Therefore, when there are a greater number of open slots available, the chance of you joining a campaign will be higher based on normal criteria such as karma, activity, popularity, trust, etc.

Seeing it the way you explain it, it makes more sense, and although I know that each manager has their own criteria when selecting participants, I never thought that nationality would be one of them, we always learn something. Here Russian is also one of the languages ​​that has the most participants and activity, however there are other languages, like Spanish for example, which has very little, other languages ​​have 0 participation unfortunately. I hope that changes in the near future.

[Wiwo]

I think the admin have nothing to do with how campaign managers decide to use karma as criteria for selecting participants, the managers have the sole right and since campaign managers are looking for quality posters to promote the brand, karma I a show of rewards for quality posting and contribution, this balance the whole thing why campaign manager may decide to use karma as criteria for selections.

Just like in the bitcointalk forum, same goes here when comparing karma vs merits.

[Freemind]

I think the admin have nothing to do with how campaign managers decide to use karma as criteria for selecting participants, the managers have the sole right and since campaign managers are looking for quality posters to promote the brand, karma I a show of rewards for quality posting and contribution, this balance the whole thing why campaign manager may decide to use karma as criteria for selections.

Just like in the bitcointalk forum, same goes here when comparing karma vs merits.

No, the administrator has nothing to do with what we are talking about here, it is the sole and exclusive decision of those responsible for the signature campaigns.

I should also say that karma does not work the same way as merits in BTT since they are not necessary (until a future system update and to a lesser extent) for the account rank to increase. I repeat this so that new users do not think that both systems work the same.

[nakamura12]

It depends on the campaign manager on what rules or what criteria is required before someone can join the campaign. As you may have read, others have mentioned that it requires karma before you can join but it doesn't go that way but a campaign manager may require a certain amount of karma before someone can join the campaign. In short, it all depends on the campaign manager on what rules or criteria that should be set on the campaign.

[Z-tight]

Just like in the bitcointalk forum, same goes here when comparing karma vs merits.

True, it is almost the same thing, just works in slightly different ways, because here we cannot see the posts we earn +/- Karma on, and also there is no demerit in bitcointalk forum, but there is - Karma in this forum, and too bad that people abuse it.

[Lucius]

True, it is almost the same thing, just works in slightly different ways, because here we cannot see the posts we earn +/- Karma on, and also there is no demerit in bitcointalk forum, but there is - Karma in this forum, and too bad that people abuse it.

People will always abuse anything that can bring them profit, so some sell merits on BTT, or give them to themselves with the help of alt accounts, and I have no doubt that many abuse karma on this forum - which is actually very easy because, apart from the admin, no one see who gave whom +/- karma. While this has advantages in that there are no personal conflicts, the system is far from ideal.

I hope that the admin will complete the feature as soon as possible that will allow us to at least see which post has received karma points, and that way we will at least have an insight into how users use karma points.

[snowpega]

I think the admin have nothing to do with how campaign managers decide to use karma as criteria for selecting participants, the managers have the sole right and since campaign managers are looking for quality posters to promote the brand, karma I a show of rewards for quality posting and contribution, this balance the whole thing why campaign manager may decide to use karma as criteria for selections.

Just like in the bitcointalk forum, same goes here when comparing karma vs merits.

Obviously, buddy, this is so obvious that the manager has the sole right to select campaign participants in any project as they have been working in this field from long time and they have good experience which one should be selected for their campaign advertisement. other than that, As we know the manager is one who brings projects on the forum so he/she is the source and has the sole right of selecting participants. Well, in my point of view if we talk about Bitcoin talk you may see some posters that have very less merits in 120 days but they are still working in campaigns just because of their good posting behavior.

Other than that here Karma system is still under development and I came to know about it after reading some posts here on the forum maybe the criteria may change after the implementation of the new system.