Should we limit members in one campaign?

[mightwalker]

There are a very few projects did that to guarantee bounty hunters' benefit. Most of the bounty managers don't care much about this. They only care about organize as many bounties as possible by showing the number of bounty hunters that take part in their bounties to project owners.

[Collinberg]

I think members should be restricted especially in signature and content campaigns, too many people in article campaigns tend to bring problems because scammers start copying the work of the first set of people to submit.

[Thegals]

If possible, each bounty is given a limit on the number of participants. So that the results obtained for bounty hunters can be many. Because if the participants are large or unlimited, the results obtained are also small. Although for the ICO developer, they will be happy with the large number of participants, so that those who promote the ICO project are more numerous.

[Komorhan]

I am dealing with bounty for 6 months. participation in quality projects is getting too much and the amount is not worth $ 1 most of the time. social media bounty unfortunately does not have any return on time. If you can write an article because it gives.

[Zed0X]

Bounty hunters would definitely want to limit the number of participants so they can have more rewards. Founders on the other hand wants more exposure and the more the number of participants, the wider the reach.

It's a 50/50 for me, I want to have better rewards but I also want the project to have a higher chance of success in raising the funds from token sale.

[Melon]

Too many people in campaign articles tend to bring trouble because scammers start copying the work of the first group of people to submit. I think members must be limited especially in signature campaigns and content,

[Citysatoshi]

And besides articles, limiting the number of participants in bounty campaign largely depend on the project team decesion, unfortunately, every projects need certain high numbers of participants to information about project very wide.

[PRIBO247]

On one hand it could be a good thing reason being that, the early birds will benefit and not have to share with latecomers.  This method will profit bounty hunters greatly.
On the other hand, it will not profit the project much if participants are limited because the more the participants, the more the exposure and I believe most project look more at the exposure of their projects than the benefit of the hunter.

[Dkingbh]

think its a good idea to limit members in a campaign, you just said that, we got less because there is to many people in.

[M.bhussaini]

Sometimes it's better to limit the participants not by quantity, but by the quality of Facebook accounts and Twitter with a lot of friends and followers

[Kiama]

It is better to limit the number of participants so that they receive a decent reward for the work done.

[Seeyy]

I think members must be limited especially in campaigns and signature content. Too many people in campaign articles tend to bring trouble because scammers start copying works from the first group of people to send.

[alstevenson]

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

That is a good idea to maximize the bounty rewards, we should always give a limit on the participants on a particular campaign.

[Rex]

I think we should limit to 1,000 people so that we can have a quality community, and the less people mean the higher reward, than they will focus on their work and trying to complete it

[Zed0X]

I think we should limit to 1,000 people so that we can have a quality community, and the less people mean the higher reward, than they will focus on their work and trying to complete it

There are campaigns that does this strategy. You don't find them often since there's only a few of them unfortunately.