USA 2024 Elections betting

[babo]

today we will finally have the debate or duel between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump
I expect to hear news about crypto and bitcoin in the political duel
I'm really curious to know what they'll talk about

will anyone follow him? If it would be nice and kind if you gave us some sort of report

[Kemarit]

today we will finally have the debate or duel between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump
I expect to hear news about crypto and bitcoin in the political duel
I'm really curious to know what they'll talk about

will anyone follow him? If it would be nice and kind if you gave us some sort of report

Definitely, we will follow it as fellow crypto enthusiast. Others have been saying as well that this is the reason why the price suddenly goes to $57,000 in the last 24 hours or at least a 3% increased.

Hopefully, we can hear their stance or crypto, although we have seen Trump and his political party as they put it in their agenda. While Harris and her party are anti-crypto, at least that's what we have seen in the current administration of Biden.

[pawel7777]

I think we all know that Kamala has close to zero "positive" support (meaning people who would vote for her because they like what she represents). It's all about pro-Trumpers Vs anti-Trumpers, there's no such thing as pro-Kamala. So I think it's ultimately down to Trump and how he behaves in the last month of the campaign.

I wouldn't be surprised if Kamala gets the win. If her handlers were to tell her to tone down with controversial opinions (i.e. unrealised gains tax) and focus on just looking normal and not unhinged, she could jump up in polls. Trump has a solid base of boomer voters but seems to be losing the votes of younger conservatives, who are disappointed by his first term as well as being pro-Israel first, rather than pro-USA.
Also, he has almost no 2016 vibe left.

[Captain Corporate]

This is quite right, and there was nearly zero pro-biden neither, nobody really cared about Biden or to be fair any other candidate neither. There was a huge following of Bernie Sanders, if he got the nomination there would be a ton of pro-bernie people, but aside from him, everyone else just nominated because they were not trump and that's how the election went. Even if Hillary had the nomination once again, she would have won that time, it was clear. This time its not just about what trump does, its about its been 4 years since trump left, so its about if people forgot about it or not.

[Jating]

Now the debate is over, who do you think win on that?

It seems that Kamala Harris experience as a prosecutor was evident on the debate and Trump was on the defensive. But he knows how to detract or retreated to immigration, as he knows that this could be his deciding votes will come.

And as per Stake, Kamala Harris is now the favorite to win at 1.95, against Trump at 2.05

[babo]

a person who saw it told me that it was a rally and not a real debate
- embarrassing choice of questions
- fact checking only for Donald Trump
- questions asked ad hoc to favor someone
- journalists in favor of Kamala Harris, no questions about her extremist past

I'm not interested in either of them but I invite you to reflect

[pawel7777]

Has anyone seen the whole debate? What are your opinions?
I've seen Elon Musk tweeting (or X-ing?) that Kamala looked much better than expected and that the debate hosts were showing strong anti-Trump bias. If it's true that Kamala knew questions beforehand and if Trump got hard-ball ones, then no wonder she looked like a winner.
I haven't seen in, but people are saying that it shouldn't have any effect on the polls, but we'll see.

[Stompix]

Hopefully, we can hear their stance or crypto, although we have seen Trump and his political party as they put it in their agenda. While Harris and her party are anti-crypto, at least that's what we have seen in the current administration of Biden.

So now you have it, not a single word, he totally forgot about crypto, no wonder!
It was about time some realized he was here only for the hype!

Has anyone seen the whole debate? What are your opinions?
I've seen Elon Musk tweeting (or X-ing?) that Kamala looked much better than expected and that the debate hosts were showing strong anti-Trump bias. If it's true that Kamala knew questions beforehand and if Trump got hard-ball ones, then no wonder she looked like a winner.

Yeah, yeah, she simply trashed him!
The moment he starts talking about immigrants stealing and eating pets you know he lost it!

Directly from Fox:
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/trump-harris-face-off-there-clear-winner-dont-believe-election-over

It’s pretty clear to me that on Tuesday night, Vice President Kamala Harris won what may be the only debate between herself and former President Trump.

If fox says that, imagine how bad it was!

[babo]

..

It’s pretty clear to me that on Tuesday night, Vice President Kamala Harris won what may be the only debate between herself and former President Trump.

If fox says that, imagine how bad it was!

With the journalist who did fact checking only with Donald Trump
like the cat thing

Trump: Ohio people eat Cats (LOOOL)
Presenter after 10 seconds: it's not true, we called the mayor (LOOOL)

so how did you call the mayor in 10 seconds and get the answer

we don't talk bullshit

then I repeat both, Donald Trump and Kamala Harris are pieces of shit
so the talk is embarassing for both

[Lucius]

~snip~
then I repeat both, Donald Trump and Kamala Harris are pieces of shit
so the talk is embarassing for both

I would not use such a term for a person who is literally a "little baby" for DT, given that the man has as many as 34 indictments (if I'm not mistaken). Something is definitely rotten in the US if such a man is not in prison but is a candidate for president.

~snip~
So now you have it, not a single word, he totally forgot about crypto, no wonder!
It was about time some realized he was here only for the hype!
---
Yeah, yeah, she simply trashed him!
The moment he starts talking about immigrants stealing and eating pets you know he lost it!

Anyone with a little better tactics can beat DT, because the man is definitely getting further and further away from reality, he mentions things that are strange to say the least. While he talks about eaten pets, his Minister for Technology Mr. Mars is publicly offering to make children for pop star - now it's just a question of how low they can go

+1

[Stompix]

Trump: Ohio people eat Cats (LOOOL)
Presenter after 10 seconds: it's not true, we called the mayor (LOOOL)
so how did you call the mayor in 10 seconds and get the answer
we don't talk bullshit

Seriously?
The claim was made Monday by Vance, the report from both the police and the mayor about no such thing happening where public before the debate, it was a known fact
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/misinformation/jd-vance-ohio-police-no-reports-haitian-immigrants-harming-pets-rcna170271

Are you seriously defending the guy claiming immigrants steal cats and dogs to eat and that liberals want to kill babies after they are born?
Pizzagate? Common!

Anyone with a little better tactics can beat DT, because the man is definitely getting further and further away from reality, he mentions things that are strange to say the least. While he talks about eaten pets, his Minister for Technology Mr. Mars is publicly offering to make children for pop star - now it's just a question of how low they can go

Oh yeah, the now beloved Musk, who once was the most hated man because he sold his Bitcoisn and claimed Bitcoin minignis bad for the Earth.
The short memory of trumpists is astonishing to say the least!

[babo]

Trump: Ohio people eat Cats (LOOOL)
Presenter after 10 seconds: it's not true, we called the mayor (LOOOL)
so how did you call the mayor in 10 seconds and get the answer
we don't talk bullshit

Seriously?
The claim was made Monday by Vance, the report from both the police and the mayor about no such thing happening where public before the debate, it was a known fact
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/misinformation/jd-vance-ohio-police-no-reports-haitian-immigrants-harming-pets-rcna170271

Are you seriously defending the guy claiming immigrants steal cats and dogs to eat and that liberals want to kill babies after they are born?
Pizzagate? Common!

I don't defend anyone, I've always said that I dislike Donald Trump
I disliked Silvio Berlusconi, they are both the same

you're the one taking sides, not me
I say things as I see them, objectively

to Mrs. Kamala Harris it is not. No awkward or difficult questions were asked LOLOLOL
no questions about his past, of Kamala... TROLOL2



so ask yourself a question, yes the talk was a trap for Donald Trump, right wrong I don't care
I don't care if the wars end, but I don't care which of the two pieces of shit is president

[pawel7777]

Why are people, including some experts of opinion that Bitcoin could tank if Kamala is elected as the POTUS?
Some examples of news articles:
Bitcoin: Could a Kamala Harris Victory Signal a Rough Ride for the Bulls?
Bernstein predicts a bitcoin price of $80-90k if Trump wins presidential race, or $30-40k if Harris is elected

It doesn't make sense to me, she (or the group that she's a part of) has been in power for the last 4 year and not only have they not did any major harm to Bitcoin, but also during their watch we've seen approval of the spot ETFs, meaning any ideas of delegalising Bitcoin are close to impossible. The KYC requirements are already as strict as it gets, so I don't see any major risk here, unless I'm missing something.

[babo]

so many things don't make sense in the political world, we could fill an entire encyclopedia
I don't like either of them, I just can't stand them both

my only hope would be the end of the ongoing wars where so many innocent people pay for the wicked choices of those who only have to sell weapons

[Jating]

so many things don't make sense in the political world, we could fill an entire encyclopedia
I don't like either of them, I just can't stand them both

my only hope would be the end of the ongoing wars where so many innocent people pay for the wicked choices of those who only have to sell weapons

I guess we there are a lot of us here who doesn't like any of them candidates.

But the thing is that, there are betting options here right now, and there are possibilities that we can make a lot of money here. Trump is the slight underdog, so regardless of what our views and political affiliations, if we talk about making money, we might go with the underdog so that we will get a good profits, just saying.

However, if this thread is about debates and what's not, then others can go at it for as long as they can.

But since this in the gambling board, all we care is what are the odds are, specially for non-US gamblers and who is going to win.