I would have no obligation to show up your court
Correct, this is the point I was making. No need to explain my point back to me here.
No, I'm not tell you that. I'm saying that if you agreed to have judges decide this, then this could be an alternative option. Obviously given there would be no obligation for you to accept a verdict from the court, as it's not their usual jurisdiction, then it'd be pointless a case going there unless you'd agree to a judges verdict.
In second thought it would be interesting to see someone neutral judges all reviews posted, so we can finally identify royse weird standards.
I want to see all reviews rated by neutral judges please.
Given AB de Royse777 doesn't agree to this, regarding the review payment, there would be little to no point in that. Judges could reach a verdict but it would not be enforceable.
You're only option based on the forum court is to take them to court as part of a scam accusation, and if found guilty by judges then they would receive the scammer tag. I should warn you that there is a
very high bar for proving someone is a scammer, in order to receive such a tag, requiring
clear evidence of scamming users. This also wouldn't have any effect on the way AB de Royse777 conducts their business, which is entirely their own business etc, as they have explained. This thread is otherwise insufficient for a scam accusation case, so I'll leave you to open a court case if you think that is a good idea.
Based on the current accusation, I believe it would be insufficient and likely thrown of court, so I wouldn't recommend it.