You don’t explain crypto. You explain the problem crypto tried to solve, and whether it did or not is still contested
Start here: The current financial system is slow, expensive, and exclusionary. Not everyone has a bank, not everyone trusts governments, and transaction control is weaponized. Crypto was engineered to bypass all of that. Not to destroy the system. Just to expose its fragility
So when friends ask, I keep it raw:
- It’s code as money
- It’s value as consensus
- It’s ownership without permission
It makes money because people believe in scarcity. Because tokens can represent real or perceived utility. Because early adoption is always rewarded by late curiosity
But most people don’t care about cryptography or decentralization. They care about income. So show them staking yields, P2E models, or stablecoin lending. Keep it concrete. Don’t preach. Don’t defend. Just lay it out
Because crypto isn’t a religion. It’s a question: Do you still trust the old system? If yes, skip it. If not, start learning