Should we limit members in one campaign?

[mr.Robot]

Yes it is good to make limitation in bounty program. By this spam in social platform and the platform that run a bounty can be less. And participate can be limited by bounty budget. Also bounty hunters will get a good amount of reward if there have any limitation for participate.

[saprakib]

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

I thinking you are just right,Lots bounty participant make spam on social page .I think its all depend on the bounty team of this project .They have a plan how they go through and become succeeded . However it will be better to limit the members ,Everything depend on the team on this regards.

[saprakib]

Yes it is good to make limitation in bounty program. By this spam in social platform and the platform that run a bounty can be less. And participate can be limited by bounty budget. Also bounty hunters will get a good amount of reward if there have any limitation for participate.

Yes definitely .If its become limited the payment of bounty hunters will be increased .They should work with more quality and without spamming as well.

[Seeyy]

I think everything depends on the gift team of this project. They have a plan for how they pass and become successful. But it would be better to limit the members. Everything depends on the team in this matter.

[Sapp]

participating in a bounty can be limited by the bounty budget. Prize hunters will also get a good number of prizes if there are limits to participating. good for making restrictions in the gift program. With this spam on social platforms and platforms that run the gift can be lacking.

[Delgado]

Whether or not to limit participants in ICO bounty campaigns is primarily up to the ICO project team. In general, it is in their interests that their project is advertised by as many more bounty campaigners. They limit the number of such participants when they are paid for a certain period of time, usually a week, directly in their tokens, and not in shares.

[hair]

I think limiting the number of participants is very good to reduce spammers who register bounties with multiple accounts. So that the rewards are also obtained a lot more than unlimited participants

[Astra]

I think limiting the number of participants is very good to reduce spammers who register bounties with multiple accounts. So that the rewards are also obtained a lot more than unlimited participants

Most bounty hunters are of the opinion that it would be nice to limit the number of people joining a certain ICO generosity campaign, and above all the signature campaign, arguing that earnings in this case will be higher. However, the decision to limit the number of participants in the signature campaign will have almost no effect on reducing the number of people who use multiple accounts.

[hair]

However, the decision to limit the number of participants in the signature campaign will have almost no effect on reducing the number of people who use multiple accounts.

Using a duplicate account on this forum will get marked "duplicate" on the profile, if someone try to use it will automatically be banned. Being an honest person is better than cheating to join the bounty.

[sky20]

I agree with your proposal. Members of the one campaign should be limited. Now a days lots of members join in one campaign but as a result there is no one get expected amount of coin for this reason scammer are trying to use duplicate account. So I think it project manager should think about this issue.

[Altcoin1998$]

I think all bounty campaigns participants should limit because there a lot of participants but all participants don't follow bounties rules and regulations. At the end of any campaign participants hugely but we get a little bit amounts of payment. So i think BD and bubblex should limit participants.

[Hometown]

I think limit participants in the bounties projects is a good decision. Because In a bounty campaign, lastly we get a little bit of amounts due to the huge participants. Examples of bounty detective and bubblex campaign, participants hugely but we get a tiny amounts.

[Ten Ryuu]

I think limit participants in the bounties projects is a good decision. Because In a bounty campaign, lastly we get a little bit of amounts due to the huge participants. Examples of bounty detective and bubblex campaign, participants hugely but we get a tiny amounts.

Same here, I do think that limiting the participants is benefit to both the bounty hunters, and the bounty owner.  With limited numbers of participants, bounty manager can assure the quality of the participants.  He can easily identify the spammers, and low quality participants and kick them out of the campaign.  The project will have a good impressions since bounty hunters are doing a quality job thus a possible more investors getting interested in participating in that project.  In return, bounty participants will be well rewarded in their quality service thus will have the habit of doing their best to maintain those good rewards.  Limiting participants is a win win thing for both bounty hunters, bounty managers and bounty campaign owner.

[Joyjoyce0]

Campaigns with a caped number of participants is best. It guarantees quality participation and give the manager ease of monitoring

[H2O]

I think limit participants should not be possible because more the participants more the advertisements. But some disadvantages also... More participants less amount of payments hence a project still will be dead due to low amounts of exchange tokens.