There is a huge difference in understanding the forum between natives here and teleported members.
Not exactly sure what you mean by this, but this could just be due to time on the forum which gains experience.
I meant other things like disrespecting and not understanding the forum rules. So 9 out of 10 cases of spam, multiaccounting, abusing karma etc... come from old Altt users, not from Teleported.
I agree that teleported members are better quality users compared to original members, due to better understanding general forum etiquette, bounties, etc, there's no doubt about that.
But otherwise it's the newer members that have always lacked a deeper
understanding of the forum, and this year that comes from teleported members it seems.
I believe that many teleported members will agree with me (now I sound like a true senator
), but the arrangement of the forum is too complicated for such a small community.
Not to repeat myself, but, there are too many similar boards and subboards, which are mostly dedicated to bounty and general discussion, with an obvious desire to raise the quality, but through various badges.
Not just teleported members, but older members too. There has been broad agreement in the senate about this problem hence changes have been made in the past to improve it.
I also think it will be easier in the senate to make these changes, as long as proposals are simple and well structured as they have been in the past. For example by breaking up more complicated or detailed proposals into parts so senators can agree/disagree on say 1-10 suggestions without having to support or reject an entire proposal for restructuring. So for example:
1. Merge these child boards into the parent board
2. Merge this section with that section
3. Move this section to this that category
Then senators are able to vote yes/no on the proposals one by one. The problem with a full blown proposal to restructure the forum is that there will always be counter-proposals, additions to the proposal, disagreements within the proposal, and it becomes a messy job trying to understand the support for different parts of the proposal without making notes. This is what I call the "noise of the suggestion box" which otherwise is usually avoided in the senate by having less participants in each discussion orientated around voting.