Gambling and Emotions !

[SmartGold01]

We can probably see from the results of the recent match, namely the match between Barcelona vs Las Palmas. Who thinks Barcelona will lose? I don't think anyone thinks like that.

However, we can see what the results of the match are like, yes Barcelona had to swallow defeat from their guests Las Palmas who even statistically Las Palmas lost far from Barcelona. but this is a match whose results could be far from what we predict.

To me often see this kind of game to be rigged game where they had already to turned it to correct score and sold out the result the already to people. This kind of game you wouldn't think that such results would go the opposite because everyone believed that the strongest club would definitely win the game. So, in this we can't just conclude it to be emotions rather rigged matched because strong team like don't easily lose just like that.

I can't go that far, because I have no basis or reason to say these things. Although it may be true because we never know what happens behind the game.

Regardless of all that, this is also something that can make us think that luck is real in gambling. Whether it is arranged and so on, that is another thing. Because there is not enough evidence to say that either.

How would you know and have idea about it without the information being leaked from top and even if would leak it wouldn't be immediately maybe after some days where the game might have ended, though there could be punishment for those who did that be it player or coach, they will definitely be sacked for their singular actions to rigged or accept fixed matches.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

Luck is the determining factor in gambling and if we based on skills without putting the factor that propelled winning then we would just be gambling as a blind man who went to touch an elephant and said it's like a mountain.
Whomsoever that is gambling and put luck at forefront and considered skills less is whom knows what they are doing, and definitely would try out the little skills in them and let the luck takes its place.

Most certainly!
The reason I believe why majority of the gamblers out there encounter several problems in gambling is due to the fact that they decide to prioritize their skills and experience and downplay the essence and importance of luck in gambling. And when gamblers feels overly confident in their skills alone, they feel a sense of overconfidence in their gambling, thereby undermining the potential risks and dangers associated with gambling. A gambler needs to first realize that no matter how good he feels he is, gambling was designed to always be in favour of the house, and no matter how you try to study it, the house will always be at more advantage than the gambler. 

Just like you said, luck plays one of the major roles in gambling and coming to this acknowledgment helps gambler to set realistic expectations and boundaries when they gamble, and this helps to mitigate the risks of losses in the best way possible.

[SmartGold01]

Luck is the determining factor in gambling and if we based on skills without putting the factor that propelled winning then we would just be gambling as a blind man who went to touch an elephant and said it's like a mountain.
Whomsoever that is gambling and put luck at forefront and considered skills less is whom knows what they are doing, and definitely would try out the little skills in them and let the luck takes its place.

Most certainly!
The reason I believe why majority of the gamblers out there encounter several problems in gambling is due to the fact that they decide to prioritize their skills and experience and downplay the essence and importance of luck in gambling. And when gamblers feels overly confident in their skills alone, they feel a sense of overconfidence in their gambling, thereby undermining the potential risks and dangers associated with gambling. A gambler needs to first realize that no matter how good he feels he is, gambling was designed to always be in favour of the house, and no matter how you try to study it, the house will always be at more advantage than the gambler. 

Just like you said, luck plays one of the major roles in gambling and coming to this acknowledgment helps gambler to set realistic expectations and boundaries when they gamble, and this helps to mitigate the risks of losses in the best way possible.

Absolutely, as I know that when they acknowledge the luck in gambling they wouldn't be that determining on their skills rather would also put that efforts to make the luck counts, even though we must think skills are also there to enhance the possibility of winning but we shouldn't do away the luck attached to the winning possibilities. Though gambling is said to be a game of chances and possibility but we can't solely rely on skills neither luck because we needs both to explore the chances of winning.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

Absolutely, as I know that when they acknowledge the luck in gambling they wouldn't be that determining on their skills rather would also put that efforts to make the luck counts, even though we must think skills are also there to enhance the possibility of winning but we shouldn't do away the luck attached to the winning possibilities. Though gambling is said to be a game of chances and possibility but we can't solely rely on skills neither luck because we needs both to explore the chances of winning.

Yes, skills are indeed essential as it increases the gambler’s chances of winning, the skills are only needed to give the gambler an edge, but it’s never paramount. There are even gambling games that do not even require even the slightest bit of skill or experience but 100% luck, such as the rolling dice games, we also have the roulette games and the slot machine games too, these games do not require the gambler’s skill or experience, just purely luck, it’s best games when it comes to testing just how lucky a player really is.

[Igebotz]

Yes, skills are indeed essential as it increases the gambler’s chances of winning, the skills are only needed to give the gambler an edge, but it’s never paramount. There are even gambling games that do not even require even the slightest bit of skill or experience but 100% luck, such as the rolling dice games, we also have the roulette games and the slot machine games too, these games do not require the gambler’s skill or experience, just purely luck, it’s best games when it comes to testing just how lucky a player really is.

I believe that only sports betting requires skill because you are dealing with humans who make up the team, and with detailed information about the team, a gambler can make decisions that produce results.

As you mentioned, this is not the case in most casinos because you cannot conduct research on the casino games because they are entirely luck-based. Sometimes what we calculate yields results, but this is due to luck rather than skill.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

I believe that only sports betting requires skill because you are dealing with humans who make up the team, and with detailed information about the team, a gambler can make decisions that produce results.

As you mentioned, this is not the case in most casinos because you cannot conduct research on the casino games because they are entirely luck-based. Sometimes what we calculate yields results, but this is due to luck rather than skill.

You make a valid point but if you look at it from a different angle, there are other games asides sports betting that also requires some level of skills too, in fact there are also some games that may arguably require more of skill than luck, example is the card games, whereby you and your opponent go on head to head and only the best man wins, in this kind of card game, like Poker, the more skill you have to predict your opponent’s next move and sort out best strategy to counter their moves, the more chances you have of winning, in this games, your experience and skills gives you the advantage and upper hand when playing rather than luck, luck only works for you when your opponent makes a costly mistake that gives you an advantage.

[$crypto$]

I can't go that far, because I have no basis or reason to say these things. Although it may be true because we never know what happens behind the game.

Regardless of all that, this is also something that can make us think that luck is real in gambling. Whether it is arranged and so on, that is another thing. Because there is not enough evidence to say that either.

How would you know and have idea about it without the information being leaked from top and even if would leak it wouldn't be immediately maybe after some days where the game might have ended, though there could be punishment for those who did that be it player or coach, they will definitely be sacked for their singular actions to rigged or accept fixed matches.

Honestly, I don't really understand what you're saying, because didn't you say that before that the match was fixed and it was certain who the winner would be? Maybe you can explain this in more detail.

But of course if that happens and is proven, then there will be punishment that they will receive, whoever is involved in this kind of match fixing. But again, I don't want to talk too much about this.

[DragonF]

How would you know and have idea about it without the information being leaked from top and even if would leak it wouldn't be immediately maybe after some days where the game might have ended, though there could be punishment for those who did that be it player or coach, they will definitely be sacked for their singular actions to rigged or accept fixed matches.

Most people make hasty decisions out of disappointment due to an unexpected outcome of a game. We sometimes make predictions and expect the results to be as predicted. Matches are fixed, but it is not as simple as people make it appear, and there is a punishment for it as you mentioned making match fixing extremely risky.

Sports officials and players are prohibited from gambling in order to demonstrate the extent to which match fixing is unacceptable. This is to prevent match-fixing. Additionally, some matches that were suspected of being fixed were later found not to be fixed following an investigation. This is why it is not proper to draw conclusion in a hurry.

[bitterguy28]

How would you know and have idea about it without the information being leaked from top and even if would leak it wouldn't be immediately maybe after some days where the game might have ended, though there could be punishment for those who did that be it player or coach, they will definitely be sacked for their singular actions to rigged or accept fixed matches.

if a match was rigged there is no time frame for anyone to come out and admit what they did it could be a minute after the match ended or maybe even a year after and the punishment would be just the same except maybe no one would care as much if someone leaked the truth a few years after the match ended because maybe not a lot of people would even remember the match unless it was a championship deciding match then it would be a huge issue still

anyway this kind of accusations are heavy and anyone that would be proven to be a part of such scheme should and would be punished by the sporting authority and most likely be banned from the sport

[Rubel007]

I can't go that far, because I have no basis or reason to say these things. Although it may be true because we never know what happens behind the game.

Regardless of all that, this is also something that can make us think that luck is real in gambling. Whether it is arranged and so on, that is another thing. Because there is not enough evidence to say that either.

How would you know and have idea about it without the information being leaked from top and even if would leak it wouldn't be immediately maybe after some days where the game might have ended, though there could be punishment for those who did that be it player or coach, they will definitely be sacked for their singular actions to rigged or accept fixed matches.

Honestly, I don't really understand what you're saying, because didn't you say that before that the match was fixed and it was certain who the winner would be? Maybe you can explain this in more detail.

But of course if that happens and is proven, then there will be punishment that they will receive, whoever is involved in this kind of match fixing. But again, I don't want to talk too much about this.

Currently, fixed matches are a common thing in sports betting, but we cannot say anything about it because there is no specific evidence. However, looking at the style of the game, perhaps the spectators and supporters can assume many things that have no basis. In gambling, I have seen some gamblers that when they win a bet, their emotions and when they lose, both are different. In most causes who loss in gambling they produce negative comments.

[SmartGold01]

How would you know and have idea about it without the information being leaked from top and even if would leak it wouldn't be immediately maybe after some days where the game might have ended, though there could be punishment for those who did that be it player or coach, they will definitely be sacked for their singular actions to rigged or accept fixed matches.

anyway this kind of accusations are heavy and anyone that would be proven to be a part of such scheme should and would be punished by the sporting authority and most likely be banned from the sport

Yes they would be ban for doing that if they noticed that is what happened, and of course leaking out such information could be hard and after months or a year if such information are being passed across I don't think there would be much effects or people who would want to adhere to such maybe they could likely see it as plot against the opposite opposite people.
If they are ban this shows that they wouldn't be anticipating in anything like sport anymore because they would be globally ban, just as they did ban some people thereabout.

[$crypto$]

Honestly, I don't really understand what you're saying, because didn't you say that before that the match was fixed and it was certain who the winner would be? Maybe you can explain this in more detail.

But of course if that happens and is proven, then there will be punishment that they will receive, whoever is involved in this kind of match fixing. But again, I don't want to talk too much about this.

Currently, fixed matches are a common thing in sports betting, but we cannot say anything about it because there is no specific evidence. However, looking at the style of the game, perhaps the spectators and supporters can assume many things that have no basis. In gambling, I have seen some gamblers that when they win a bet, their emotions and when they lose, both are different. In most causes who loss in gambling they produce negative comments.

Match fixing is indeed an enemy in football and in the past there were indeed many cases that were finally revealed. But now it seems that it has started to decrease, especially in the big leagues that get a lot of attention.

But we never know what happens behind the scenes before the match, but what is clear is that for the big leagues I am quite confident that they do it cleanly.

[bitterguy28]

Match fixing is indeed an enemy in football and in the past there were indeed many cases that were finally revealed. But now it seems that it has started to decrease, especially in the big leagues that get a lot of attention.

maybe they just got better in hiding them, no? lol i am joking but with the exposure of the sport to social media it is getting more and more difficult to be discreet these days and i think that maybe less and less teams or athletes are trying to forge their way into greatness by cheating in fear of getting caught

can you imagine how huge the news be if someone was caught fixing a match with social media involved?

[Rubel007]

Honestly, I don't really understand what you're saying, because didn't you say that before that the match was fixed and it was certain who the winner would be? Maybe you can explain this in more detail.

But of course if that happens and is proven, then there will be punishment that they will receive, whoever is involved in this kind of match fixing. But again, I don't want to talk too much about this.

Currently, fixed matches are a common thing in sports betting, but we cannot say anything about it because there is no specific evidence. However, looking at the style of the game, perhaps the spectators and supporters can assume many things that have no basis. In gambling, I have seen some gamblers that when they win a bet, their emotions and when they lose, both are different. In most causes who loss in gambling they produce negative comments.

Match fixing is indeed an enemy in football and in the past there were indeed many cases that were finally revealed. But now it seems that it has started to decrease, especially in the big leagues that get a lot of attention.

But we never know what happens behind the scenes before the match, but what is clear is that for the big leagues I am quite confident that they do it cleanly.

None of us know the real facts, which is why we cannot say with certainty, but I can make a very good guess. It would be difficult to say that there is no match-fixing, in the recent games I have been watching, especially in cricket. But I have said before and I still say that there is no evidence of such a thing. And if there was no match-fixing, then there would never have been such a difference in the odds in the games. Maybe many arguments can be given here. But such a situation will not arise in all matches. No one knows which matches will be fixed and which will not. So such arguments may be worthless.

[_act_]

We may not completely achieve stopping our-self from being emotional while gambling, but we should make sure we are able to control it whenever it shows up, because being emotional could be the only reason to win or lose a bet as we are able to control it, there are times what we feels may not be the direct applicable scenario to what we should go for in gambling, because not all that appears to us are the same way we perceived them in gambling.