As A Bounty Hunter - Which System Of Payment Do You Prefer, Stakes Or Fixed Amount?

[alyanov]

If I prefer the stake system, because with this system, all the results we get with hard work will be paid off, and also this stake system will make the bounty hunters work optimally, to get the results they want, and of course it also depends to the bounty campaign that follows.

[tasyad12]

if I am more interested in paying through fixed payments, even though the number of participants increases but the pay is still no less or more

[Alcor]

Of course, for bounty hunters, a fixed amount is much better than rates. With a fixed amount, you can clearly see how much we can earn, and when betting - not. You can earn a lot of bets, and then it turns out that they cost almost nothing. In addition, when fixed payments do not matter to us how many more participants will join the ICO signature campaign. It does not affect our earnings. When betting it affects directly: the more participants, the less earnings.

[UNIVERSE]

In bounty participation, I only join the signature bounty campaign. In this case, so far, I like preferring to get the fixed amount of the tokens per week. Because it shows me how many tokens that I will get, out of the numbers of participant involved.

[debra]

if I am more interested in paying through fixed payments, even though the number of participants increases but the pay is still no less or more

As the name is fixed amount, so the amount of rewards have been established with a certain number. While the stakes may change because of the number of participants or the allocation is trimmed by the team or the bounty manager. I also choose the fixed amount for better payment and fair for all parts.   

[KKH84]

THE STAKES SYSTEM OF PAYMENT IN A BOUNTY
Stakes are a means of measurement. It is used to allot weekly payment to a bounty hunter according to his/her status/followers on social media. For instance, let's say Company A is releasing token B and there are 8 people in their bounty campaign. They have allocated 1million tokens for this. E.g
Facebook/Twitter Campaign
200 - 1000 friends/followers = 1stake per week
1001 - 2,500 friends/followers = 4stakes per week and so on.
Lets say person 1 has 1300 stakes, person 2 has 500 stakes and
the rest of the people combined have 4000 stakes.
Then the total would be 5800 stakes and will be thus calculated,
(1 million / 5800)*(amount of stakes a hunter has)  in case of person 2
that will be : 1 million/5800*500 = 86,206.895 of token B.
So person 2 will receive 86,206.895 of token B at the end of the campaign. This amount of token is only possible if there are limited participants in the bounty campaign.

FIXED PAYMENT
Using the above scenario, Company A is releasing 1million token B for their bounty and they decided that according to the bounty hunters rank/followers in social media, certain amount of token B will be paid weekly. E.g
Facebook/Twitter Campaign
200-1000 = 500 token B per week
1001 - 2,500 = 750 token B per week and so on.....
with this system of payment, the bounty hunter is able to calculate at a glance barring unforseen circumstances, what he/she is going to get at the end of the campaign.
Take for instance person 2 is in the second category and worked for 10 weeks that will be 10*750 = 7,500 token B at the end of the campaign.


Most of the Bounty Managers prefer to use the stakes system for bounty payments. As far as I am concern, that system cheats! Not everyone can calculate accurately how many tokens one will receive at the end of the bounty. I prefer by far the fixed amount system so I know that for a certain period of work, this is what I will receive.

What about you guys? Which do you prefer, the stakes system or fixed amount payment for bounty?

If look at your description of the payment system for bounty hunters, I tend to prefer fixed payments, because it will be clear how many tokens will be obtained without asking the head as I did, besides the fixed payments can increase enthusiasm for the bounty hunter.

[Tiana1]

It all depends on the situation or project. Attimes, stakes are better and sometimes fixed is better. Stakes can be better when the total number of participants are not much, one would get higher tokens when it shared among the participants unless otherwise. Fixed, on the other hand is good because at the beginning of the project you already know what you are working for, the amount of tokens to receive at the end of the bounty but the amount is fixed for distribution and no extra tokens will be added for bounty participants if there are any unlike the stakes. Sometimes I prefer stakes and sometimes I prefer fixed depending on the project.

[stewardess]

This is a rather difficult choice, due to the fact that some projects want to get a fixed amount, as the number of people is very large.

[Tasha8]

Of course, fixed payment is better than steaks. Receiving such a payment, you always know that you are working for a reason and know how much you will get for participating in the project.

[karateka]

You know, I would like some projects to specify the number of stacks, because due to the number of investors involved, you can get more.

[Akinohn]

I think a fixed amount suits most people, because you initially know how much you will be paid for your work.

[coyote]

I communicate with a large number of bounty hunters and can say with confidence that everyone would prefer a fixed profit.

[napster]

It depends on the bounty project that I am gdiving into. Well, everybody always wants to get more and more no matter what. But fixed amount looks like a bit hard to process with. S I am going to go with stakes.

[napster]

It depends on the bounty project that I am gdiving into. Well, everybody always wants to get more and more no matter what. But fixed amount looks like a bit hard to process with. S I am going to go with stakes.

[aiviaa485]

It's better to use the right payment because we don't need to reclaim empty-handed.
But indeed there is a lot of evidence that the Manager's Bounty uses Stake for calculating token payments.